A comprehensive survey of various methods in opinion spam detection

被引:8
|
作者
Mewada, Arvind [1 ]
Dewang, Rupesh Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Motilal Nehru Natl Inst Technol Allahabad, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Prayagraj 211004, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Natural language processing; Review feature; Reviewer feature; Word representation; Semantic; Part-of-speech; NEURAL-NETWORK; FAKE; REVIEWS; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-022-13702-5
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the development of technology, e-marketing and business competition, reviews significantly affect people's lives. Consumers of e-commerce sites share their experiences, referencing other user reviews when making consumption decisions and evaluating product quality. People's dependence on review information and business competition has triggered the emergence of false reviews. False reviews refer to the promotion or demotion of the quality of the product. False reviews can easily confuse new users' opinions or judgments, due to which both the consumer and the company are affected. Addressing this issue, spam review is a new research problem today, and even humans do not quickly classify spam reviews with high accuracy. Machine learning methods and natural language processing techniques effectively recognise false reviews and help users get benign review information. In this research, we have categorized and classified spam review detection methods in the direction of review features, reviewer features, and the spammer's group features. In this article, we focus on three approaches for detecting false reviews: spam review detection, spammer detection, and spammer-group detection. This article provides a motivational analysis of the three types of research and, in particular, compares them to aspects of feature design, model methods, datasets, and rating indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:13199 / 13239
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Spam Detection on Twitter : A Survey
    Kaur, Prabhjot
    Singhal, Anuhha
    Kaur, Jasleen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INDIACOM - 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 2570 - 2573
  • [12] Detection of review spam: A survey
    Heydari, Atefeh
    Tavakoli, Mohammad Ali
    Salim, Naomie
    Heydari, Zahra
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (07) : 3634 - 3642
  • [13] Opinion Mining using Ontological Spam Detection
    Duhan, Neelam
    Divya
    Mittal, Mamta
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFOCOM TECHNOLOGIES AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS (TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS) (ICTUS), 2017, : 557 - 562
  • [14] Comprehensive Survey on Intrusion Detection on various hardware and software
    Bontupalli, VenkataRamesh
    Taha, Tarek M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 IEEE NATIONAL AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE (NAECON), 2015, : 267 - 272
  • [15] A Survey on Various Shadow Detection and Removal Methods
    Kumar, P. C. Nikkil
    Malathi, P.
    COMPUTATIONAL VISION AND BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING, 2020, 1108 : 395 - 401
  • [16] GANs for Semi-Supervised Opinion Spam Detection
    Stanton, Gray
    Irissappane, Athirai A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 5204 - 5210
  • [17] An ensemble approach for spam detection in Arabic opinion texts
    Saeed, Radwa M. K.
    Rady, Sherine
    Gharib, Tarek F.
    JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY-COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 34 (01) : 1407 - 1416
  • [18] RLOSD: Representation Learning based Opinion Spam Detection
    Sedighi, Zeinab
    Ebrahimpour-Komleh, Hossein
    Bagheri, Ayoub
    2017 3RD IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ICSPIS), 2017, : 74 - 80
  • [19] Impact of Behavioral and Textual Features on Opinion Spam Detection
    Rastogi, Ajay
    Mehrotra, Monica
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (ICICCS), 2018, : 852 - 857
  • [20] Securing Behavior-based Opinion Spam Detection
    Ge, Shuaijun
    Ma, Guixiang
    Xie, Sihong
    Yu, Philip S.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2018, : 112 - 117