Unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision and mental health symptoms: A cross-sectional survey

被引:5
|
作者
Biggs, M. Antonia [1 ]
Driver, Matthew [2 ]
Kaller, Shelly [1 ]
Ralph, Lauren J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Bixby Ctr Global Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Abortion; Anxiety; Depression; Mental health; Social support; Stress; PREGNANT-WOMEN; STIGMA; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; PARENTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2022.10.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of unwanted abortion disclosure and levels of social support in the abor-tion decision and their association with depression, anxiety, and stress.Study design: From January to June 2019, we surveyed people presenting for abortion at four clinics in California, New Mexico, and Illinois regarding their experiences accessing abortion. We used multivari-able regression to examine associations between unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision, and symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress.Results: Among 1092 people approached, 784 (72% response rate) eligible individuals initiated the survey, and 746 responded to the unwanted abortion disclosure item and were included in analyses. Over one-quarter (27%) told someone they would have preferred not to tell about their decision, mostly due to obstacles getting to the appointment-time to appointment (46%), travel distance (33%), and costs (32%). Three-quarters (74%, n = 546) had at least one person in their life who supported the abortion decision "very much"; 20% had someone who supported the decision "not at all." In adjusted analyses, unwanted abortion disclosure was associated with more symptoms of depression (B = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.28, 0.95), anxiety (B = 1.79; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.82) and stress (B = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.72). People also had more symptoms of depression and stress when one or more person (B = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.27, 1.02 and B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.15, 1.35, respectively) or the man involved in the pregnancy (B = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.18 and B = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.13, 1.78, respectively) supported their decision "not at all" (vs "very much" support).Conclusion: Being forced to disclose the abortion decision due to logistical and cost constraints may be harmful to people's mental health. Implications: Logistical burdens such as travel, time to access care, and costs needed to access abortion may force people seeking abortion to involve others who are unsupportive in the abortion decision having negative implications for their mental health.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ACCESS TO SOCIAL CAPITAL AND SOCIAL SUPPORT AMONG SOUTH EAST ASIAN WOMEN WITH SEVERE MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY
    Dutt, Krishnakshi
    Webber, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 56 (06) : 593 - 605
  • [32] Assessing post-abortion care in health facilities in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional study
    Nasratullah Ansari
    Partamin Zainullah
    Young Mi Kim
    Hannah Tappis
    Adrienne Kols
    Sheena Currie
    Jaime Haver
    Jos van Roosmalen
    Jacqueline EW Broerse
    Jelle Stekelenburg
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15
  • [33] Assessing post-abortion care in health facilities in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional study
    Ansari, Nasratullah
    Zainullah, Partamin
    Kim, Young Mi
    Tappis, Hannah
    Kols, Adrienne
    Currie, Sheena
    Haver, Jaime
    van Roosmalen, Jos
    Broerse, Jacqueline E. W.
    Stekelenburg, Jelle
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [34] Modeling the cross-sectional relationships between religion, physical health, social support, and depressive symptoms
    Koenig, HG
    Hays, JC
    George, LK
    Blazer, DG
    Larson, DB
    Landerman, LR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 5 (02): : 131 - 144
  • [35] The estimated incidence of induced abortion in Kenya: a cross-sectional study
    Mohamed, Shukri F.
    Izugbara, Chimaraoke
    Moore, Ann M.
    Mutua, Michael
    Kimani-Murage, Elizabeth W.
    Ziraba, Abdhalah K.
    Bankole, Akinrinola
    Singh, Susheela D.
    Egesa, Caroline
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [36] The Abortion Web Ecosystem: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Trustworthiness and Bias
    Han, Leo
    Boniface, Emily R.
    Han, Lisa Yin
    Albright, Jonathan
    Doty, Nora
    Darney, Blair G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (10)
  • [37] The estimated incidence of induced abortion in Kenya: a cross-sectional study
    Shukri F. Mohamed
    Chimaraoke Izugbara
    Ann M. Moore
    Michael Mutua
    Elizabeth W. Kimani-Murage
    Abdhalah K. Ziraba
    Akinrinola Bankole
    Susheela D. Singh
    Caroline Egesa
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15
  • [38] Support and attitudes of Qatar mental health professionals to a proposed mental health inpatient smoking ban: Results of a cross-sectional survey
    Badanapurkar, Ashishkumar
    Nelson, Deborah
    Varghese, Sejo
    Singh, Rajvir
    Haddad, Peter M.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2022, 29 (02) : 327 - 345
  • [39] Social support network, mental health and quality of life: a cross-sectional study in primary care
    Portugal, Flavia Batista
    Campos, Monica Rodrigues
    Correia, Celina Ragoni
    Goncalves, Daniel Almeida
    Ballester, Dinarte
    Tofoli, Luis Fernando
    Mari, Jair de Jesus
    Gask, Linda
    Dowrick, Christopher
    Bower, Peter
    Fortes, Sandra
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2016, 32 (12):
  • [40] Fear of contamination, perceived social support and physical health of health social workers in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional survey
    Chow, Amy Y. M.
    Suen, Margaret H. P.
    Jiao, Keyuan
    Ng, Yong Hao
    Wang, Juan
    Chan, Cecilia L. W.
    SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 61 (04) : 280 - 297