Unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision and mental health symptoms: A cross-sectional survey

被引:5
|
作者
Biggs, M. Antonia [1 ]
Driver, Matthew [2 ]
Kaller, Shelly [1 ]
Ralph, Lauren J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Bixby Ctr Global Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Abortion; Anxiety; Depression; Mental health; Social support; Stress; PREGNANT-WOMEN; STIGMA; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; PARENTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2022.10.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of unwanted abortion disclosure and levels of social support in the abor-tion decision and their association with depression, anxiety, and stress.Study design: From January to June 2019, we surveyed people presenting for abortion at four clinics in California, New Mexico, and Illinois regarding their experiences accessing abortion. We used multivari-able regression to examine associations between unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision, and symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress.Results: Among 1092 people approached, 784 (72% response rate) eligible individuals initiated the survey, and 746 responded to the unwanted abortion disclosure item and were included in analyses. Over one-quarter (27%) told someone they would have preferred not to tell about their decision, mostly due to obstacles getting to the appointment-time to appointment (46%), travel distance (33%), and costs (32%). Three-quarters (74%, n = 546) had at least one person in their life who supported the abortion decision "very much"; 20% had someone who supported the decision "not at all." In adjusted analyses, unwanted abortion disclosure was associated with more symptoms of depression (B = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.28, 0.95), anxiety (B = 1.79; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.82) and stress (B = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.72). People also had more symptoms of depression and stress when one or more person (B = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.27, 1.02 and B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.15, 1.35, respectively) or the man involved in the pregnancy (B = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.18 and B = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.13, 1.78, respectively) supported their decision "not at all" (vs "very much" support).Conclusion: Being forced to disclose the abortion decision due to logistical and cost constraints may be harmful to people's mental health. Implications: Logistical burdens such as travel, time to access care, and costs needed to access abortion may force people seeking abortion to involve others who are unsupportive in the abortion decision having negative implications for their mental health.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The infrastructural capacity of Ghanaian health facilities to provide safe abortion and post-abortion care: a cross-sectional study
    Owolabi, Onikepe
    Riley, Taylor
    Otupiri, Easmon
    Polis, Chelsea B.
    Larsen-Reindorf, Roderick
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Mental health and behaviour of students of public health and their correlation with social support: a cross-sectional study
    Biro, Eva
    Adany, Roza
    Kosa, Karolina
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [23] Mental Health Symptoms When Abortion Access Is Restricted
    Steinberg, Julia R.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (04): : 289 - 291
  • [24] Mental health and behaviour of students of public health and their correlation with social support: a cross-sectional study
    Éva Bíró
    Róza Ádány
    Karolina Kósa
    BMC Public Health, 11
  • [25] EXAMINING "BELIEFS" ABOUT ABORTION-WHAT IS ABORTION AND HOW SHOULD ABORTION BE REGULATED: FINDINGS FROM A MULTI-STATE CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY.
    Carter, G.
    Simmons, R.
    Baayd, J.
    Gero, A.
    Turok, D. K.
    Sanders, J.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2023, 127 : 20 - 21
  • [26] A Cross-Sectional Study of the Psychosocial Problems Following Abortion
    Kotta, Sameera
    Molangur, Umashankar
    Bipeta, Rajshekhar
    Ganesh, Radhika
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 60 (02) : 217 - 223
  • [27] Repeat induced abortion and adverse childhood experiences in Aquitaine, France: a cross-sectional survey
    Haddad, Sami
    Martin-Marchand, Laetitia
    Lafaysse, Mathilde
    Saurel-Cubizolles, Marie-Josephe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2021, 26 (01): : 29 - 35
  • [28] The impact of US abortion policy on rheumatology clinical practice: a cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists
    Bermas, Bonnie L.
    Blanco, Irene
    Ramsey-Goldman, Rosalind
    Blazer, Ashira D.
    Clowse, Megan E. B.
    Edens, Cuoghi
    Donley, Greer
    Pierce, Leslie
    Wright, Catherine
    Talabi, Mehret Birru
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 76 (03) : 485 - 486
  • [29] Factors Associated With Perceived Trust of False Abortion Websites: Cross-sectional Online Survey
    Chaiken, Sarina Rebecca
    Han, Lisa
    Darney, Blair G.
    Han, Leo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04)
  • [30] Pain catastrophizing, but not mental health or social support, is associated with menstrual pain severity in women with dysmenorrhea: A cross-sectional survey
    Evans, Subhadra
    Dowding, Charlotte
    Olive, Lisa
    Payne, Laura A.
    Druitt, Marilla
    Seidman, Laura C.
    Skvarc, David
    Mikocka-Walus, Antonina
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2022, 27 (06) : 1410 - 1420