Unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision and mental health symptoms: A cross-sectional survey

被引:5
|
作者
Biggs, M. Antonia [1 ]
Driver, Matthew [2 ]
Kaller, Shelly [1 ]
Ralph, Lauren J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Bixby Ctr Global Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Abortion; Anxiety; Depression; Mental health; Social support; Stress; PREGNANT-WOMEN; STIGMA; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; PARENTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2022.10.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of unwanted abortion disclosure and levels of social support in the abor-tion decision and their association with depression, anxiety, and stress.Study design: From January to June 2019, we surveyed people presenting for abortion at four clinics in California, New Mexico, and Illinois regarding their experiences accessing abortion. We used multivari-able regression to examine associations between unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision, and symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress.Results: Among 1092 people approached, 784 (72% response rate) eligible individuals initiated the survey, and 746 responded to the unwanted abortion disclosure item and were included in analyses. Over one-quarter (27%) told someone they would have preferred not to tell about their decision, mostly due to obstacles getting to the appointment-time to appointment (46%), travel distance (33%), and costs (32%). Three-quarters (74%, n = 546) had at least one person in their life who supported the abortion decision "very much"; 20% had someone who supported the decision "not at all." In adjusted analyses, unwanted abortion disclosure was associated with more symptoms of depression (B = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.28, 0.95), anxiety (B = 1.79; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.82) and stress (B = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.72). People also had more symptoms of depression and stress when one or more person (B = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.27, 1.02 and B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.15, 1.35, respectively) or the man involved in the pregnancy (B = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.18 and B = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.13, 1.78, respectively) supported their decision "not at all" (vs "very much" support).Conclusion: Being forced to disclose the abortion decision due to logistical and cost constraints may be harmful to people's mental health. Implications: Logistical burdens such as travel, time to access care, and costs needed to access abortion may force people seeking abortion to involve others who are unsupportive in the abortion decision having negative implications for their mental health.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abortion, unwanted childbearing, and mental health
    Russo, Nancy Felipe
    SALUD MENTAL, 2014, 37 (04) : 283 - 291
  • [2] Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care
    Kaller, Shelly
    Ralph, Lauren
    Wingo, Erin
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [3] Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care
    Shelly Kaller
    Lauren Ralph
    Erin Wingo
    M. Antonia Biggs
    BMC Women's Health, 23
  • [4] Future health providers' willingness to provide abortion services following decriminalisation of abortion in Chile: a cross-sectional survey
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Casas, Lidia
    Ramm, Alejandra
    Baba, C. Finley
    Correa, Sara Victoria
    Grossman, Daniel
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [5] A cross-sectional survey of US abortion patients' interest in obtaining medication abortion over the counter
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Ralph, Lauren
    Morris, Natalie
    Ehrenreich, Katherine
    Perritt, Jamila
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Blanchard, Kelly
    White, Kari
    Barar, Rana
    Grossman, Daniel
    CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 109 : 25 - 31
  • [6] Experiences of abortion in the UK Armed Forces: a cross-sectional survey
    Kinkaid, Victoria Elizabeth
    Guest, Ruth
    Willman, Antony
    King, Kate
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2025,
  • [7] Clinical experience and perception of abortion: A cross-sectional survey of gynecologists in Japan
    Mizuno, Maki
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2015, 6 (04) : 255 - 256
  • [8] Induced abortion in 30 Chinese provinces in 2013: a cross-sectional survey
    Wu, Shangchun
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Wang, Kun
    Wang, Shuchen
    Li, Jiong
    Zhang, Wei-Hong
    LANCET, 2015, 386 : 18 - 18
  • [9] Is Repeat Abortion a Public Health Problem among Chinese Adolescents? A Cross-Sectional Survey in 30 Provinces
    Liu, Jinlin
    Wu, Shangchun
    Xu, Jialin
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Zhang, Wei-Hong
    Li, Jian
    Xiong, Cheng-Liang
    Liu, Jun-Li
    Meng, Qing-Long
    Che, Yan
    Zhao, Wei-Li
    Zhang, Hui-Ping
    Qian, Xu
    Jiang, Hong
    Liang, Ji
    Wu, Shangchun
    Zhou, Yan
    Liu, Qing
    Hu, Lina
    Dong, Xiao-Jing
    Jiang, Yi
    Liu, Shuai-Bei
    Gan, Xiao-Ling
    Olsen, Jorn
    Li, Jiong
    Tolhurst, Rachel
    Esther, Dusabe-Richards
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (05)
  • [10] Domestic violence in a UK abortion clinic: anonymous cross-sectional prevalence survey
    Motta, Silvia
    Penn-Kekana, Loveday
    Bewley, Susan
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2015, 41 (02): : 128 - 133