Impact of sacubitril/valsartan and gliflozins on cardiac resynchronization therapy response in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure patients

被引:4
|
作者
Fonderico, Celeste [1 ]
Pergola, Valerio [1 ]
Faccenda, Daniele [1 ]
Salucci, Alfonsomaria [1 ]
Comparone, Gianluigi [1 ]
Marrese, Aldo [1 ]
Ammirati, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cocchiara, Luigi [1 ]
Varriale, Alfonso [1 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [1 ]
Rapacciuolo, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Strisciuglio, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Div Cardiol, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Via S Pansini, 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; Sodium -glucose co -transporter 2 inhibitors; DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE; ETIOLOGY; PREDICTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131391
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, however their effects in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients have been scarcely explored. This study investigated whether ARNi and SGLT2i 1) improve the rate of clinical and echocardiographic CRT response and 2) have different impact based on the ischemic or non-ischemic etiology. Methods: HFrEF patients referred for CRT implant were grouped in no treatment (group 1), only ARNi (group 2) and both ARNi and SGLT2i (group 3). Clinical and echocardiographic response were evaluated at 12 months. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled. At one-year follow-up, 74.4% patients in group 2 (p = 0.031) and 88.9% in group 3 (p = 0.014) were classified as clinical responders vs 54.5% in the no treatments group. In multivariable analysis, ARNi/SGLT2i use was an independent predictor of CRT response (OR 3.72; CI 95%, 1.40-10.98; p = 0.011), confirmed in both groups 2 and 3. At 12 months, the median Delta LVEF increase was 6% and 8.5% in groups 2 and 3 respectively, vs 4.5% in group 1 (p = 0.042 and p = 0.029) with significantly more echocardiographic responders in groups 2 and 3 (76% and 78% vs 50%, p = 0.003 and p = 0.036). Significantly more ischemic HFrEF patients than non-ischemic were considered clinical and echocardiographic responders in the treatment groups. Conclusions: ARNi alone or in combination with SGLT2i in CRT patients improves the clinical and echocardiographic response at 12 months. Ischemic patients seem to benefit more from these treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term impact of diabetes in patients hospitalized with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure
    Andersson, Charlotte
    Weeke, Peter
    Pecini, Redi
    Kjaergaard, Jesper
    Hassager, Christian
    Kober, Lars
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2010, 44 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [42] Statin therapy is associated with improved survival in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure
    Horwich, TB
    MacLellan, WR
    Fonarow, GC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (04) : 642 - 648
  • [44] Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Improvement of Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
    Itoh, Mitsuaki
    Yoshida, Akihiro
    Shinke, Toshiroh
    Kozuki, Amane
    Takei, Asumi
    Fukuzawa, Koji
    Kiuchi, Kunihiko
    Imamura, Kimitake
    Fujiwara, Ryudo
    Suzuki, Atsushi
    Nakanishi, Tomoyuki
    Yamashita, Soichiro
    Matsumoto, Akinori
    Hirata, Ken-ichi
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [45] Long-term outcomes of resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Single-centre experience
    Baimbetov, A. Adil
    Baimakhanov, B.
    Yakupova, I.
    Bizhanov, K.
    Bigeldiyev, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2024, 26 : 27 - 27
  • [46] Cardiac contractility modulation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
    Nikolaeva, O. A.
    Uskach, T. M.
    Sapelnikov, O. V.
    Ardus, D.
    Cherkashin, D. I.
    Grishin, I. R.
    Safiulina, A. A.
    Amanatova, V. A.
    Akchurin, R. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2020, 22 : 223 - 224
  • [47] Carotid involvement in patients with non-ischemic heart failure
    Stan, A.
    Sirbu, I. V.
    Kelemen, P.
    Pogacean, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2016, 18 : 360 - 360
  • [48] Metabolic syndrome is associated with different clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
    Szepietowska, Barbara
    McNitt, Scott
    Polonsky, Bronislava
    Sherazi, Saadia
    Biton, Yitschak
    Kutyifa, Valentina
    Aktas, Mehmet K.
    Moss, Arthur J.
    Zareba, Wojciech
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (03) : 344 - 351
  • [49] Quantifying cardiac stress and myocardial necrosis in ischemic acute heart failure and non-ischemic acute heart failure
    Heinisch, C.
    Arenja, N.
    Socrates, T.
    Reiter, M.
    Twerenbold, R.
    Noveanu, M.
    Reichlin, T.
    Meissner, J.
    Uthoff, H.
    Mueller, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 574 - 574
  • [50] Diabetes aggravates heart failure progression in ischemic but not non-ischemic heart failure
    Dries, DL
    Sweitzer, NK
    Drazner, MH
    Exner, DV
    Stevenson, LW
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 718 - 719