Impact of sacubitril/valsartan and gliflozins on cardiac resynchronization therapy response in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure patients

被引:4
|
作者
Fonderico, Celeste [1 ]
Pergola, Valerio [1 ]
Faccenda, Daniele [1 ]
Salucci, Alfonsomaria [1 ]
Comparone, Gianluigi [1 ]
Marrese, Aldo [1 ]
Ammirati, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cocchiara, Luigi [1 ]
Varriale, Alfonso [1 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [1 ]
Rapacciuolo, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Strisciuglio, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Div Cardiol, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Via S Pansini, 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; Sodium -glucose co -transporter 2 inhibitors; DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE; ETIOLOGY; PREDICTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131391
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, however their effects in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients have been scarcely explored. This study investigated whether ARNi and SGLT2i 1) improve the rate of clinical and echocardiographic CRT response and 2) have different impact based on the ischemic or non-ischemic etiology. Methods: HFrEF patients referred for CRT implant were grouped in no treatment (group 1), only ARNi (group 2) and both ARNi and SGLT2i (group 3). Clinical and echocardiographic response were evaluated at 12 months. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled. At one-year follow-up, 74.4% patients in group 2 (p = 0.031) and 88.9% in group 3 (p = 0.014) were classified as clinical responders vs 54.5% in the no treatments group. In multivariable analysis, ARNi/SGLT2i use was an independent predictor of CRT response (OR 3.72; CI 95%, 1.40-10.98; p = 0.011), confirmed in both groups 2 and 3. At 12 months, the median Delta LVEF increase was 6% and 8.5% in groups 2 and 3 respectively, vs 4.5% in group 1 (p = 0.042 and p = 0.029) with significantly more echocardiographic responders in groups 2 and 3 (76% and 78% vs 50%, p = 0.003 and p = 0.036). Significantly more ischemic HFrEF patients than non-ischemic were considered clinical and echocardiographic responders in the treatment groups. Conclusions: ARNi alone or in combination with SGLT2i in CRT patients improves the clinical and echocardiographic response at 12 months. Ischemic patients seem to benefit more from these treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contemporary Challenges of Regenerative Therapy in Patients with Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Failure
    Banovic, Marko
    Poglajen, Gregor
    Vrtovec, Bojan
    Ristic, Arsen
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (12)
  • [22] Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate in Non-Ischemic Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial
    Ghotbi, Adam Ali
    Sander, Mikael
    Kober, Lars
    Philbert, Berit Th.
    Gustafsson, Finn
    Hagemann, Christoffer
    Kjaer, Andreas
    Jacobsen, Peter K.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [23] Patients with higher peak VO2 and non-ischemic etiology of heart failure respond better to cardiac resynchronization therapy than patients with ischemic heart disease
    Chwyczko, T.
    Smolis-Bak, E.
    Sterlinski, M.
    Maciag, A.
    Kraska, A.
    Firek, B.
    Pytkowski, M.
    Borowiec, A.
    Kowalik, I.
    Szwed, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 1032 - 1033
  • [24] Extent of viability to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic heart failure patients
    Ypenburg, Claudia
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Bleeker, Gabe B.
    Steendijk, Paul
    Boersma, Eric
    Dibbets-Schneider, Petra
    Stokkel, Marcel P.
    van der Wall, Ernst E.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2006, 47 (10) : 1565 - 1570
  • [25] Reverse Remodeling and Functional Improvement of Left Ventricle in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan: Comparison between Non-Ischemic and Ischemic Etiology
    Cemin, Roberto
    Casablanca, Simona
    Foco, Luisa
    Schoepf, Elisabeth
    Erlicher, Andrea
    Di Gaetano, Renato
    Ermacora, Davide
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [26] The differences of cardiac sympathetic activity in ischemic and non-ischemic chronic heart failure patients
    Mishkina, A.
    Saushkin, V.
    Zavadovsky, K.
    Lebedev, D.
    Lishmanov, Y.
    Popov, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S380 - S380
  • [27] Epicardial Adipose Tissue Measured From Computed Tomography Predicts Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response in Patients With Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure
    Qin, Hui-yuan
    Wang, Cheng
    Qian, Duo-duo
    Cui, Chang
    Chen, Ming-long
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [28] Various methods for selection of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Lebedev, D. Denis
    Popov, S. V.
    Krivolapov, S.
    Minin, S.
    Savenkova, G.
    Gulya, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2015, 17 : 78 - 78
  • [29] Differential actions of cardiac resynchronization therapy upon ANP and BNP in patients with non-ischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy
    Boerrigter, G
    Madden-Vadnais, SC
    Costello-Boerrigter, LC
    Cataliotti, A
    Heublein, DM
    Abraham, WT
    Hill, MRS
    Burnett, JC
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2004, 10 (04) : S49 - S49
  • [30] Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe heart failure may influence the development of unstable ventricular tachycardia
    Lebedev, D. Denis
    Mishkina, A. I.
    Lebedeva, M. V.
    Popov, S. V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2020, 22 : 118 - 119