Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the characterization of Palpable breast lesions: A prospective observational study

被引:1
|
作者
Boruah, Deb K. [1 ]
Konwar, Nitashree [2 ]
Gogoi, Bidyut B. [3 ]
Hazarika, Karuna [2 ]
Ahmed, Halimuddin [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Gauhati 781101, Assam, India
[2] Tezpur Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Radiodiag, Tezpur 784010, Assam, India
[3] Assam Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Pathol, Barbari 786002, Assam, India
来源
关键词
DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging); DCE-MRI (dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging); Kinetic curve; Breast carcinoma; BI-RADS; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-023-01002-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundBreast MRI is the imaging modality of choice in patients with palpable breast lesions unequivocal on mammography and ultrasonography. This study aims to evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the characterization and differentiation of various palpable breast lesions. This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital between July 2019 and June 2021. Sixty-six patients with palpable breast lesions were undergone MRI scans of the breasts. The various palpable breast lesions were categorized according to the 5th edition BI-RADS lexicon. The sensitivity of ADC mapping and DCE-MRI was determined for differentiation of various palpable breast lesions according to the BI-RADS category and gold standard histopathological findings.ResultsOf 66 patients with palpable breast lesions, 36 patients (54.5%) were benign and 30 patients (45.5%) were malignant lesions. Malignant palpable breast lesions had a mean ADC value of 0.939 +/- 0.166[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and benign lesions had 1.891 +/- 0.524[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s where unpaired Student t-test showed statistically significant difference of P value 0.0005. BI-RADS 2 lesions had a mean ADC value of 2.056 +/- 0.471[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, BI-RADS 3 had 1.314 +/- 0.151[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, BI-RADS 4 had 0.935 +/- 0.119[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and BI-RADS 5 had 0.930 +/- 0.943[SD] x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. BI-RADS 2 category showed optimal cutoff mean ADC of 1.508 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 94.7%, BI-RADS 3 lesions had 1.208 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 55.2%, BI-RADS 4 lesions had 1.064 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity 80% and specificity of 67.9%, and BI-RADS 5 lesions had 1.013 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 82.6%.ConclusionsBreast MRI is superior to the other imaging modalities for the characterization and differentiation of various palpable breast lesions. The combined use of ADC mapping and DCE-MRI had more sensitivity than conventional MRI, ADC mapping or DCE-MRI alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feature and Classifier Selection for Automatic Classification of Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the breast
    Gal, Yaniv
    Mehnert, Andrew
    Bradley, Andrew
    Kennedy, Dominic
    Crozier, Stuart
    2009 DIGITAL IMAGE COMPUTING: TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS (DICTA 2009), 2009, : 132 - +
  • [22] Joint estimation of shape and deformation for the detection of lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Hong, Byung-Woo
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (21): : 7757 - 7775
  • [23] Characteristics of axillary lymph nodes apparent on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI in healthy women
    Krammer, Julia
    Engel, Dorothee
    Nissen, Johanna
    Schnitzer, Andreas
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Wasser, Klaus
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2012, 36 (04) : 249 - 254
  • [24] Diffusion-weighted imaging versus dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a new horizon for characterisation of suspicious breast lesions
    El Ameen, N. F.
    Gawad, E. A. Abdel
    Ghany, H. S. Abdel
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 76 (01) : 80.e1 - 80.e8
  • [25] A multiparametric approach to diagnosing breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging and ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Ohashi, Akane
    Kataoka, Masako
    Iima, Mami
    Kanao, Shotaro
    Honda, Maya
    Urushibata, Yuta
    Nickel, Marcel Dominik
    Kishimoto, Ayami Ohno
    Ota, Rie
    Toi, Masakazu
    Togashi, Kaori
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 71 : 154 - 160
  • [26] Visualization of ablation lesions by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DynCE) MRI
    Shmatukha A.
    Sundaram B.
    Qi X.
    Oduneye S.
    Stainsby J.
    Wright G.
    Crystal E.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 12 (Suppl 1)
  • [27] Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics and apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67-positive expression in non-mass enhancement of breast cancer
    Nie, Tingting
    Feng, Mengwei
    Yang, Kai
    Guo, Xiaofang
    Yuan, Zilong
    Zhang, Zhaoxi
    Yan, Gen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [28] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Pinker, Katja
    Moy, Linda
    Sutton, Elizabeth J.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Weber, Michael
    Thakur, Sunitha B.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (10) : 587 - 595
  • [29] Apparent diffusion coefficient values as an adjunct to dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for discriminating benign and malignant breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass like enhancement
    Moukhtar, Fatma Zeinhom
    Abu El Maati, Amal Amin
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 45 (02): : 597 - 604
  • [30] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T: a pilot study
    Harms, S. E.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2016, 27 (01): : 43 - 44