Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T: a pilot study

被引：0
|
作者：
Harms, S. E.
机构：
来源：
BREAST DISEASES | 2016年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.breastdis.2016.01.012
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：43 / 44
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T: a pilot study
    Pineda, F. D.
    Medved, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ivancevic, M. K.
    Abe, H.
    Shimauchi, A.
    Newstead, G. M.
    Karczmar, G. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1049):
  • [2] Optimizing Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI at 1.5T and 3.0T in Your Practice
    Lewis, M.
    Moccaldi, M.
    Mercado, C.
    Lee, J.
    Toth, H.
    Moy, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [3] The Added Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI at 3.0 T in Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
    Merckel, Laura G.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Peters, Nicky H. G. M.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Storm, Remmert K.
    Weits, Teun
    Duvivier, Katya M.
    van Dalen, Thijs
    Mali, Willem P. Th M.
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [4] Diagnostic Accuracy of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Differentiation of Cervical Cancer and Benign Cervical Lesions at 3.0T: Comparison With Routine MRI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Kuang, Fei
    Yan, Zhiping
    Li, Huili
    Feng, Hao
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (04) : 1094 - 1099
  • [5] An imaging protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI with 3.0T: using sagittal sequence interleaved between axial sequences
    Park, Ji Eun
    Lee, Jee Eun
    Hwang, Ji-Young
    Cha, Eun Suk
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (06) : 608 - 613
  • [6] Interscanner Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Prostate Cancer 1.5 Versus 3 T MRI
    Sertdemir, Metin
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Sourbron, Steven
    Hausmann, Daniel
    Heinzelbecker, Julia
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Dinter, Dietmar J.
    Weidner, Anja M.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (02) : 92 - 97
  • [7] BIRADS 4 breast lesions: comparison of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI
    Yasin R.
    El Ghany E.A.
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50 (1):
  • [8] Intra-individual comparison of image contrast in SPIO-enhanced liver MRI at 1.5T and 3.0T
    Marcus von Falkenhausen
    Carsten Meyer
    Götz Lutterbey
    Nuschin Morakkabati
    Oliver Walter
    Jürgen Gieseke
    Renate Blömer
    Winfried A. Willinek
    Christiane K. Kuhl
    Hans H. Schild
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1256 - 1261
  • [9] Comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 T for Contrast-Enhanced Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Angiography
    Londy, Frank Joseph
    Lowe, Suzan
    Stein, Paul D.
    Weg, John G.
    Eisner, Robert L.
    Leeper, Kenneth V.
    Woodard, Pamela K.
    Sostman, H. Dirk
    Jablonski, Kathleen A.
    Fowler, Sarah E.
    Hales, Charles A.
    Hull, Russell D.
    Gottschalk, Alexander
    Naidich, David P.
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2012, 18 (02) : 134 - 139
  • [10] Comparison of visual conspicuity between two contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions with 3.0T MRI
    Aymerich, F-X
    Auger, C.
    Alcaide, P.
    Pareto, D.
    Huerga, E.
    Corral, J-F
    Mitjana, R.
    Sastre-Garriga, J.
    Montalban, X.
    Rovira, A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 : 307 - 307
12345