Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Aortic Stenosis? A Pilot Study

被引:21
|
作者
Rouhi, Armaun D. [1 ]
Ghanem, Yazid K. [2 ]
Yolchieva, Laman [3 ]
Saleh, Zena [2 ]
Joshi, Hansa [2 ]
Moccia, Matthew C. [2 ]
Suarez-Pierre, Alejandro [4 ]
Han, Jason J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Cooper Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Camden, NJ USA
[3] Univ Penn, Coll Arts & Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Hosp Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Aortic stenosis; Heart valve disease; Readability; Health literacy; Patient education material; ChatGPT; Artificial intelligence; Large language models; Chatbots; HEALTH LITERACY; QUALITY ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; SMOG;
D O I
10.1007/s40119-023-00347-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) dialogue platforms and large language models (LLMs) may help facilitate ongoing efforts to improve health literacy. Additionally, recent studies have highlighted inadequate health literacy among patients with cardiac disease. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether two freely available generative AI dialogue platforms could rewrite online aortic stenosis (AS) patient education materials (PEMs) to meet recommended reading skill levels for the public. Methods: Online PEMs were gathered from a professional cardiothoracic surgical society and academic institutions in the USA. PEMs were then inputted into two AI-powered LLMs, ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard, with the prompt "translate to 5th-grade reading level". Readability of PEMs before and after AI conversion was measured using the validated Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOGI), and Gunning-Fog Index (GFI) scores. Results: Overall, 21 PEMs on AS were gathered. Original readability measures indicated difficult readability at the 10th-12th grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 successfully improved readability across all four measures (p < 0.001) to the approximately 6th-7th grade reading level. Bard successfully improved readability across all measures (p < 0.001) except for SMOGI (p = 0.729) to the approximately 8th-9th grade level. Neither platform generated PEMs written below the recommended 6th-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 demonstrated significantly more favorable post-conversion readability scores, percentage change in readability scores, and conversion time compared to Bard (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: AI dialogue platforms can enhance the readability of PEMs for patients with AS but may not fully meet recommended reading skill levels, highlighting potential tools to help strengthen cardiac health literacy in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 147
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Rishabh S. Mazmudar
    Anjani Sheth
    Raghav Tripathi
    Jeffrey F. Scott
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 2021, 313 : 201 - 204
  • [42] Improving the Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Therapy
    Stiller, Christine
    Brandt, Lindsay
    Adams, Megan
    Gura, Nathan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [43] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Mazmudar, Rishabh S.
    Sheth, Anjani
    Tripathi, Raghav
    Scott, Jeffrey F.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 313 (03) : 201 - 204
  • [44] Readability of online patient education materials for juvenile dermatomyositis
    Nickles, Melissa A.
    Ramani, Santhoshini L.
    Tegtmeyer, Kyle
    Zhao, Jeffrey
    Lio, Peter A.
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (02) : 544 - 546
  • [45] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [46] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Peripheral Neuropathy
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Hansberry, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [47] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 1048 - 1052
  • [48] Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Management of Pneumonia
    Chumbita, Mariana
    Cilloniz, Catia
    Puerta-Alcalde, Pedro
    Moreno-Garcia, Estela
    Sanjuan, Gemma
    Garcia-Pouton, Nicole
    Soriano, Alex
    Torres, Antoni
    Garcia-Vidal, Carolina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [49] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole A. A.
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (07) : 1175 - 1179
  • [50] How can Artificial Intelligence improve contouring
    Van Elmpt, W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S129 - S129