Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Aortic Stenosis? A Pilot Study

被引:21
|
作者
Rouhi, Armaun D. [1 ]
Ghanem, Yazid K. [2 ]
Yolchieva, Laman [3 ]
Saleh, Zena [2 ]
Joshi, Hansa [2 ]
Moccia, Matthew C. [2 ]
Suarez-Pierre, Alejandro [4 ]
Han, Jason J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Cooper Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Camden, NJ USA
[3] Univ Penn, Coll Arts & Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Hosp Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Aortic stenosis; Heart valve disease; Readability; Health literacy; Patient education material; ChatGPT; Artificial intelligence; Large language models; Chatbots; HEALTH LITERACY; QUALITY ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; SMOG;
D O I
10.1007/s40119-023-00347-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) dialogue platforms and large language models (LLMs) may help facilitate ongoing efforts to improve health literacy. Additionally, recent studies have highlighted inadequate health literacy among patients with cardiac disease. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether two freely available generative AI dialogue platforms could rewrite online aortic stenosis (AS) patient education materials (PEMs) to meet recommended reading skill levels for the public. Methods: Online PEMs were gathered from a professional cardiothoracic surgical society and academic institutions in the USA. PEMs were then inputted into two AI-powered LLMs, ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard, with the prompt "translate to 5th-grade reading level". Readability of PEMs before and after AI conversion was measured using the validated Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOGI), and Gunning-Fog Index (GFI) scores. Results: Overall, 21 PEMs on AS were gathered. Original readability measures indicated difficult readability at the 10th-12th grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 successfully improved readability across all four measures (p < 0.001) to the approximately 6th-7th grade reading level. Bard successfully improved readability across all measures (p < 0.001) except for SMOGI (p = 0.729) to the approximately 8th-9th grade level. Neither platform generated PEMs written below the recommended 6th-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 demonstrated significantly more favorable post-conversion readability scores, percentage change in readability scores, and conversion time compared to Bard (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: AI dialogue platforms can enhance the readability of PEMs for patients with AS but may not fully meet recommended reading skill levels, highlighting potential tools to help strengthen cardiac health literacy in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 147
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials
    Szabo, Palma
    Biro, Eva
    Kosa, Karolina
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [22] Readability of iPledge program patient education materials
    Howard, Rachel
    Smith, Gideon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 79 (04) : E69 - E70
  • [23] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [24] THE EVALUATION OF PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS - FOCUS ON READABILITY
    PASTORE, PO
    BERG, BK
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1987, 9 (02) : 216 - 219
  • [25] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Adam Timothy Lucy
    Stephanie L. Rakestraw
    Courtney Stringer
    Daniel Chu
    Jayleen Grams
    Richard Stahl
    Margaux N. Mustian
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6519 - 6525
  • [26] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Lucy, Adam Timothy
    Rakestraw, Stephanie L. L.
    Stringer, Courtney
    Chu, Daniel
    Grams, Jayleen
    Stahl, Richard
    Mustian, Margaux N. N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 6519 - 6525
  • [27] More can be done to improve readability of patient letters
    O'Mahony, Elizabeth A.
    Kalk, Nicola J.
    PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN, 2011, 35 (01): : 30 - 31
  • [28] Artificial intelligence and patient education
    Paluszek, Olivia
    Loeb, Stacy
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2025, 35 (03) : 219 - 223
  • [29] Artificial Intelligence in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Aortic Stenosis
    Zhang, Yuxuan
    Wang, Moyang
    Zhang, Erli
    Wu, Yongjian
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [30] An artificial intelligence algorithm for detection of severe aortic stenosis: a clinical cohort study
    Strom, J.
    Playford, D.
    Stewart, S.
    Strange, G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44