Comparing three machine learning algorithms with existing methods for natural streamflow estimation

被引:3
|
作者
Mehrvand, Shahriar [1 ]
Boucher, Marie-Amelie [1 ]
Kornelsen, Kurt [2 ]
Amani, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Genie Civil & Genie Batiment, 2500 Boul Univ, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] Ontario Power Generat, Dept Environm & Climate Change, Niagara On The Lake, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
neural networks; random forest; light gradient boosting machine; drainage area ratio method; spatial proximity transfer; NEURAL-NETWORK ENSEMBLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; PART; REGIONALIZATION; PARAMETERS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; FLOW;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2023.2273402
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Natural streamflow data is required in many hydrological applications. However, many basins are located in data-scarce regions or are impacted by human construction and activities. In this paper, we explore three machine learning algorithms, namely artificial neural networks, random forest and light gradient boosting machine, to simultaneously estimate all the parameters of the coupled modele du Genie Rural a 4 parametres Journaliers (GR4J) and snow accounting routine called CemaNeige model. A database of 675 basins in the USA and Quebec is used to train and test ensembles. After using the estimated parameters in GR4J, the resulting naturalized streamflow series are compared with those obtained by the established drainage area ratio and spatial proximity transfer methods in 11 test basins. The results indicate that the machine learning algorithms outperform the drainage area ratio and spatial proximity transfer methods. Among machine learning algorithms, random forests obtain lower (better) continuous ranked probability scores than the other methods for 10 out of 11 test basins.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 94
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing the performance of machine learning algorithms using estimated accuracy
    Gupta S.
    Saluja K.
    Goyal A.
    Vajpayee A.
    Tiwari V.
    Measurement: Sensors, 2022, 24
  • [32] Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Groundwater Mapping in Delhi
    Zainab Khan
    Mohammad Mohsin
    Sk Ajim Ali
    Deepika Vashishtha
    Mujahid Husain
    Adeeba Parveen
    Syed Kausar Shamim
    Farhana Parvin
    Rukhsar Anjum
    Sania Jawaid
    Zeba Khanam
    Ateeque Ahmad
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2024, 52 : 17 - 39
  • [33] Comparing Swarm Intelligence Algorithms for Dimension Reduction in Machine Learning
    Kicska, Gabriella
    Kiss, Attila
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [34] Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction
    Uddin, Shahadat
    Khan, Arif
    Hossain, Md Ekramul
    Moni, Mohammad Ali
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [35] Developing and comparing deep learning and machine learning algorithms for osteoporosis risk prediction
    Qiu, Chuan
    Su, Kuanjui
    Luo, Zhe
    Tian, Qing
    Zhao, Lanjuan
    Wu, Li
    Deng, Hongwen
    Shen, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7
  • [36] USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR NATURAL HABITATS ASSESSMENT
    Marian, Monica Liliana
    Nasui, Daniel
    Ghise, Ciprian Radu
    Popovici, Flavia
    Sabo, Cosmin
    Mare, Rosca Oana
    Mihalescu, Lucia
    Vasilescu, Bogdan
    Vosgan, Zorica
    CARPATHIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (01): : 103 - 113
  • [37] Software Defect Estimation Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Yalciner, Burcu
    Ozdes, Merve
    2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (UBMK), 2019, : 487 - 491
  • [38] Quantum phase estimation based algorithms for machine learning
    Ouedrhiri, Oumayma
    Banouar, Oumayma
    El Hadaj, Salah
    Raghay, Said
    2ND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATICS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (IISEC), 2021,
  • [39] SOFTWARE EFFORT ESTIMATION USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
    Lavingia, Kruti
    Patel, Raj
    Patel, Vivek
    Lavingia, Ami
    SCALABLE COMPUTING-PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE, 2024, 25 (02): : 1276 - 1285
  • [40] Deep and machine learning for daily streamflow estimation: a focus on LSTM, RFR and XGBoost
    Terzi, Oezlem
    Kuecueksille, Ecir Ugur
    Baykal, Tahsin
    Taylan, Dilek
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 18 (10) : 2401 - 2414