Comparing three machine learning algorithms with existing methods for natural streamflow estimation

被引:3
|
作者
Mehrvand, Shahriar [1 ]
Boucher, Marie-Amelie [1 ]
Kornelsen, Kurt [2 ]
Amani, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Genie Civil & Genie Batiment, 2500 Boul Univ, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] Ontario Power Generat, Dept Environm & Climate Change, Niagara On The Lake, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
neural networks; random forest; light gradient boosting machine; drainage area ratio method; spatial proximity transfer; NEURAL-NETWORK ENSEMBLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; PART; REGIONALIZATION; PARAMETERS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; FLOW;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2023.2273402
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Natural streamflow data is required in many hydrological applications. However, many basins are located in data-scarce regions or are impacted by human construction and activities. In this paper, we explore three machine learning algorithms, namely artificial neural networks, random forest and light gradient boosting machine, to simultaneously estimate all the parameters of the coupled modele du Genie Rural a 4 parametres Journaliers (GR4J) and snow accounting routine called CemaNeige model. A database of 675 basins in the USA and Quebec is used to train and test ensembles. After using the estimated parameters in GR4J, the resulting naturalized streamflow series are compared with those obtained by the established drainage area ratio and spatial proximity transfer methods in 11 test basins. The results indicate that the machine learning algorithms outperform the drainage area ratio and spatial proximity transfer methods. Among machine learning algorithms, random forests obtain lower (better) continuous ranked probability scores than the other methods for 10 out of 11 test basins.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 94
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning Algorithms for Recommending Design Methods
    Fuge, Mark
    Peters, Bud
    Agogino, Alice
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2014, 136 (10)
  • [22] Enhancing spatial streamflow prediction through machine learning algorithms and advanced strategies
    Cheghabaleki, Sedigheh Darabi
    Fatemi, Seyed Ehsan
    Mavadat, Maryam Hafezparast
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2024, 14 (06)
  • [23] Streamflow Prediction Utilizing Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms for Sustainable Water Supply Management
    Latif, Sarmad Dashti
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (08) : 3227 - 3241
  • [24] Using Optimized Deep Learning to Predict Daily Streamflow: A Comparison to Common Machine Learning Algorithms
    Khabat Khosravi
    Ali Golkarian
    John P. Tiefenbacher
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 699 - 716
  • [25] Using Optimized Deep Learning to Predict Daily Streamflow: A Comparison to Common Machine Learning Algorithms
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Golkarian, Ali
    Tiefenbacher, John P.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (02) : 699 - 716
  • [26] Streamflow Prediction Utilizing Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms for Sustainable Water Supply Management
    Sarmad Dashti Latif
    Ali Najah Ahmed
    Water Resources Management, 2023, 37 : 3227 - 3241
  • [27] Comparative Study for Daily Streamflow Simulation with Different Machine Learning Methods
    Hao, Ruonan
    Bai, Zhixu
    WATER, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [28] Daily streamflow forecasting by machine learning methods with weather and climate inputs
    Rasouli, Kabir
    Hsieh, William W.
    Cannon, Alex J.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 414 : 284 - 293
  • [29] Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury
    Parreco, Joshua
    Soe-Lin, Hahn
    Parks, Jonathan J.
    Byerly, Saskya
    Chatoor, Matthew
    Buicko, Jessica L.
    Namias, Nicholas
    Rattan, Rishi
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2019, 85 (07) : 725 - 729
  • [30] Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction
    Shahadat Uddin
    Arif Khan
    Md Ekramul Hossain
    Mohammad Ali Moni
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19