Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Kee, Ooi Ting [1 ]
Harun, Harmiza [1 ]
Mustafa, Norlaila [2 ]
Murad, Nor Azian Abdul [1 ]
Chin, Siok Fong [1 ]
Jaafar, Rosmina [3 ]
Abdullah, Noraidatulakma [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, UKM Med Mol Biol Inst UMBI, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, Fac Med, Dept Med, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
[4] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, Fac Hlth Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
关键词
Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Cardiovascular disease; Machine learning; Prediction model; RISK PREDICTION; INDIVIDUAL PROGNOSIS; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; DIAGNOSIS TRIPOD; REGRESSION; DISEASE; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12933-023-01741-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Prediction model has been the focus of studies since the last century in the diagnosis and prognosis of various diseases. With the advancement in computational technology, machine learning (ML) has become the widely used tool to develop a prediction model. This review is to investigate the current development of prediction model for the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients using machine learning. A systematic search on Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) was conducted to look for relevant articles based on the research question. The risk of bias (ROB) for all articles were assessed based on the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) statement. Neural network with 76.6% precision, 88.06% sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 was found to be the most reliable algorithm in developing prediction model for cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetes patients. The overall concern of applicability of all included studies is low. While two out of 10 studies were shown to have high ROB, another studies ROB are unknown due to the lack of information. The adherence to reporting standards was conducted based on the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) standard where the overall score is 53.75%. It is highly recommended that future model development should adhere to the PROBAST and TRIPOD assessment to reduce the risk of bias and ensure its applicability in clinical settings. Potential lipid peroxidation marker is also recommended in future cardiovascular disease prediction model to improve overall model applicability.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic literature review of software effort prediction using machine learning methods
    Ali, Asad
    Gravino, Carmine
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2019, 31 (10)
  • [42] Suicidal behaviour prediction models using machine learning techniques: A systematic review
    Nordin, Noratikah
    Zainol, Zurinahni
    Noor, Mohd Halim Mohd
    Chan, Lai Fong
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 132
  • [43] Crop yield prediction using machine learning: An extensive and systematic literature review
    Shawon, Sarowar Morshed
    Ema, Falguny Barua
    Mahi, Asura Khanom
    Niha, Fahima Lokman
    Zubair, H. T.
    SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 10
  • [44] Prediction model for cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes using machine learning derived and validated in two independent Korean cohorts
    Sang, Hyunji
    Lee, Hojae
    Lee, Myeongcheol
    Park, Jaeyu
    Kim, Sunyoung
    Woo, Ho Geol
    Rahmati, Masoud
    Koyanagi, Ai
    Smith, Lee
    Lee, Sihoon
    Hwang, You-Cheol
    Park, Tae Sun
    Lim, Hyunjung
    Yon, Dong Keon
    Rhee, Sang Youl
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [45] A systematic review of stock market prediction using machine learning and statistical techniques
    Kumar, Deepak
    Sarangi, Pradeepta Kumar
    Verma, Rajit
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 49 : 3187 - 3191
  • [46] A Systematic Literature Review of Student' Performance Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Albreiki, Balqis
    Zaki, Nazar
    Alashwal, Hany
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [47] Machine Learning and Surgical Outcomes Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Elfanagely, Omar
    Toyoda, Yoshilzo
    Othman, Sammy
    Mellia, Joseph A.
    Basta, Marten
    Liu, Tony
    Kording, Konrad
    Ungar, Lyle
    Fischer, John P.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 264 : 346 - 361
  • [48] Machine Learning and Neurosurgical Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review
    Senders, Joeky T.
    Staples, Patrick C.
    Karhade, Aditya V.
    Zaki, Mark M.
    Gormley, William B.
    Broekman, Marike L. D.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Arnaout, Omar
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 109 : 476 - +
  • [49] Machine Learning and Prediction of Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review
    Santangelo, Omar Enzo
    Gentile, Vito
    Pizzo, Stefano
    Giordano, Domiziana
    Cedrone, Fabrizio
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION, 2023, 5 (01): : 175 - 198
  • [50] Machine Learning in the Prediction of Trauma Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Zhang, Timothy
    Nikouline, Anton
    Lightfoot, David
    Nolan, Brodie
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (05) : 440 - 455