Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Kee, Ooi Ting [1 ]
Harun, Harmiza [1 ]
Mustafa, Norlaila [2 ]
Murad, Nor Azian Abdul [1 ]
Chin, Siok Fong [1 ]
Jaafar, Rosmina [3 ]
Abdullah, Noraidatulakma [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, UKM Med Mol Biol Inst UMBI, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, Fac Med, Dept Med, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
[4] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, Fac Hlth Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
关键词
Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Cardiovascular disease; Machine learning; Prediction model; RISK PREDICTION; INDIVIDUAL PROGNOSIS; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; DIAGNOSIS TRIPOD; REGRESSION; DISEASE; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12933-023-01741-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Prediction model has been the focus of studies since the last century in the diagnosis and prognosis of various diseases. With the advancement in computational technology, machine learning (ML) has become the widely used tool to develop a prediction model. This review is to investigate the current development of prediction model for the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients using machine learning. A systematic search on Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) was conducted to look for relevant articles based on the research question. The risk of bias (ROB) for all articles were assessed based on the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) statement. Neural network with 76.6% precision, 88.06% sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 was found to be the most reliable algorithm in developing prediction model for cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetes patients. The overall concern of applicability of all included studies is low. While two out of 10 studies were shown to have high ROB, another studies ROB are unknown due to the lack of information. The adherence to reporting standards was conducted based on the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) standard where the overall score is 53.75%. It is highly recommended that future model development should adhere to the PROBAST and TRIPOD assessment to reduce the risk of bias and ensure its applicability in clinical settings. Potential lipid peroxidation marker is also recommended in future cardiovascular disease prediction model to improve overall model applicability.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning for Hypertension Prediction: a Systematic Review
    Silva, Gabriel F. S.
    Fagundes, Thales P.
    Teixeira, Bruno C.
    Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre D. P.
    CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2022, 24 (11) : 523 - 533
  • [22] Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review
    van Klompenburg, Thomas
    Kassahun, Ayalew
    Catal, Cagatay
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 177
  • [23] Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
    Moor, Michael
    Rieck, Bastian
    Horn, Max
    Jutzeler, Catherine R.
    Borgwardt, Karsten
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [24] Breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning: a systematic review
    Hussain, Sadam
    Ali, Mansoor
    Naseem, Usman
    Nezhadmoghadam, Fahimeh
    Jatoi, Munsif Ali
    Gulliver, T. Aaron
    Tamez-Pena, Jose Gerardo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [25] Prediction of complications of type 2 Diabetes: A Machine learning approach
    Nicolucci, Antonio
    Romeo, Luca
    Bernardini, Michele
    Vespasiani, Marco
    Rossi, Maria Chiara
    Petrelli, Massimiliano
    Ceriello, Antonio
    Di Bartolo, Paolo
    Frontoni, Emanuele
    Vespasiani, Giacomo
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 190
  • [26] Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Occurrence Using Machine Learning Model
    Deberneh, Henock M.
    Kim, Intaek
    Park, Jae Hyun
    Cha, Eunseok
    Joung, Kyong Hye
    Lee, Jong Seon
    Lim, Dong Seok
    DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [27] Implementing a Model to Detect Diabetes Prediction using Machine Learning Classifiers
    Sireesha, P. J.
    Prakash, K.
    Sumathi, D.
    JOURNAL OF ALGEBRAIC STATISTICS, 2022, 13 (01) : 558 - 566
  • [28] Crime Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Future Directions
    Mandalapu, Varun
    Elluri, Lavanya
    Vyas, Piyush
    Roy, Nirmalya
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 60153 - 60170
  • [29] Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic review
    Poursaeed, Roya
    Mohammadzadeh, Mohsen
    Safaei, Ali Asghar
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [30] Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools
    Arina, Pietro
    Kaczorek, Maciej R.
    Hofmaenner, Daniel A.
    Pisciotta, Walter
    Refinetti, Patricia
    Singer, Mervyn
    Mazomenos, Evangelos B.
    Whittle, John
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 140 (01) : 85 - 101