Non-disclosure of developmental neurotoxicity studies obstructs the safety assessment of pesticides in the European Union

被引:9
|
作者
Mie, Axel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ruden, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Environm Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Soder Sjukhuset, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Ctr Organ Food & Farming EPOK, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Developmental neurotoxicity; Non-disclosure; Pesticides; Plant protection products; Regulatory assessment; Reporting bias; QUANTITATIVE COMPARABILITY; GUIDELINE; WORKSHOP; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1186/s12940-023-00994-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn the European Union (EU), the safety assessment of plant protection products relies to a large extent on toxicity studies commissioned by the companies producing them. By law, all performed studies must be included in the dossier submitted to authorities when applying for approval or renewal of the active substance.MethodsFor one type of toxicity, i.e. developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), we evaluated if studies submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had also been disclosed to EU authorities.ResultsWe identified 35 DNT studies submitted to the U.S. EPA and with the corresponding EU dossiers available. Of these, 9 DNT studies (26%) were not disclosed by the pesticide company to EU authorities. For 7 of these studies, we have identified an actual or potential regulatory impact.ConclusionsWe conclude that (1) non-disclosure of DNT studies to EU authorities, in spite of clear legal requirements, seems to be a recurring phenomenon, (2) the non-disclosure may introduce a bias in the regulatory risk assessment, and (3) without full access to all performed toxicity studies, there can be no reliable safety evaluation of pesticides by EU authorities. We suggest that EU authorities should cross-check their data sets with their counterparts in other jurisdictions. In addition, applications for pesticide approval should be cross-checked against lists of studies performed at test facilities operating under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), to ensure that all studies have been submitted to authorities. Furthermore, rules should be amended so that future studies should be commissioned by authorities rather than companies. This ensures the authorities' knowledge of existing studies and prevents the economic interest of the company from influencing the design, performance, reporting and dissemination of studies. The rules or practices should also be revised to ensure that non-disclosure of toxicity studies carries a significant legal risk for pesticide companies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Novel foods in the European Union: Scientific requirements and challenges of the risk assessment process by the European Food Safety Authority
    Ververis, Ermolaos
    Ackerl, Reinhard
    Azzollini, Domenico
    Colombo, Paolo Angelo
    de Sesmaisons, Agnes
    Dumas, Celine
    Fernandez-Dumont, Antonio
    da Costa, Lucien Ferreira
    Germini, Andrea
    Goumperis, Tilemachos
    Kouloura, Eirini
    Matijevic, Leonard
    Precup, Gabriela
    Roldan-Torres, Ruth
    Rossi, Annamaria
    Svejstil, Roman
    Turla, Emanuela
    Gelbmann, Wolfgang
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 137
  • [32] Preventive counter-terrorism and non-discrimination assessment in the European Union
    Eijkman, Quirine
    SECURITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 2011, 22 (02) : 89 - +
  • [33] Residues of some organophosphorus pesticides on and in fruits and vegetables available in Poland, an assessment based on the European union regulations and health assessment for human populations
    Witczak, Agata
    Pohorylo, Anna
    Abdel-Gawad, Hassan
    Cybulski, Jacek
    PHOSPHORUS SULFUR AND SILICON AND THE RELATED ELEMENTS, 2018, 193 (11) : 711 - 720
  • [34] About hazard and risk assessment: Regulatory approaches in assessing safety in the European Union chemicals legislation
    Gebel, Tom
    Lechtenberg-Auffarth, Eva
    Guhe, Christine
    REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 28 (02) : 188 - 195
  • [35] Impact of European legislation on marketed pesticides - A view from the standpoint of health impact assessment studies
    Karabelas, A. J.
    Plakas, K. V.
    Solomou, E. S.
    Drossou, V.
    Sarigiannis, D. A.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 35 (07) : 1096 - 1107
  • [36] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A SURVEY OF NON-EUROPEAN UNION AGENCIES
    Ciani, Oriana
    Wilcher, Britni
    Blankart, Carl Rudolf
    Hatz, Maximilian
    Rupel, Valentina Prevolnik
    Erker, Renata Slabe
    Varabyova, Yauheniya
    Taylor, Rod S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 31 (03) : 154 - 165
  • [37] CLINICAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF IOTROLAN-280 IN EUROPEAN CLINICAL-STUDIES
    SILVAYMANDEAU, OM
    MEISSNER, C
    WENZELHORA, BI
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1995, 5 : S85 - S88
  • [38] Relevance of body weight effects for the population development of common voles and its significance in regulatory risk assessment of pesticides in the European Union
    Magnus Wang
    Markus Ebeling
    Jörg Hahne
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2019, 31
  • [39] Relevance of body weight effects for the population development of common voles and its significance in regulatory risk assessment of pesticides in the European Union
    Wang, Magnus
    Ebeling, Markus
    Hahne, Joerg
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2019, 31 (01)
  • [40] ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY STUDIES FOR ADVANCED NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS, IN THE FRAME OF A SUSTAINABLE EUROPEAN UNION ENERGY PROGRAMME
    Zueehetti, Massimo
    Alberghi, Ciro
    Candido, Luigi
    Meli, Antonino
    Meschini, Samuele
    Segantin, Stefano
    Testoni, Raffaella
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2022, 31 (8A): : 8461 - 8467