Non-disclosure of developmental neurotoxicity studies obstructs the safety assessment of pesticides in the European Union

被引:9
|
作者
Mie, Axel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ruden, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Environm Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Soder Sjukhuset, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Ctr Organ Food & Farming EPOK, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Developmental neurotoxicity; Non-disclosure; Pesticides; Plant protection products; Regulatory assessment; Reporting bias; QUANTITATIVE COMPARABILITY; GUIDELINE; WORKSHOP; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1186/s12940-023-00994-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn the European Union (EU), the safety assessment of plant protection products relies to a large extent on toxicity studies commissioned by the companies producing them. By law, all performed studies must be included in the dossier submitted to authorities when applying for approval or renewal of the active substance.MethodsFor one type of toxicity, i.e. developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), we evaluated if studies submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had also been disclosed to EU authorities.ResultsWe identified 35 DNT studies submitted to the U.S. EPA and with the corresponding EU dossiers available. Of these, 9 DNT studies (26%) were not disclosed by the pesticide company to EU authorities. For 7 of these studies, we have identified an actual or potential regulatory impact.ConclusionsWe conclude that (1) non-disclosure of DNT studies to EU authorities, in spite of clear legal requirements, seems to be a recurring phenomenon, (2) the non-disclosure may introduce a bias in the regulatory risk assessment, and (3) without full access to all performed toxicity studies, there can be no reliable safety evaluation of pesticides by EU authorities. We suggest that EU authorities should cross-check their data sets with their counterparts in other jurisdictions. In addition, applications for pesticide approval should be cross-checked against lists of studies performed at test facilities operating under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), to ensure that all studies have been submitted to authorities. Furthermore, rules should be amended so that future studies should be commissioned by authorities rather than companies. This ensures the authorities' knowledge of existing studies and prevents the economic interest of the company from influencing the design, performance, reporting and dissemination of studies. The rules or practices should also be revised to ensure that non-disclosure of toxicity studies carries a significant legal risk for pesticide companies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of learning, memory, and attention in developmental neurotoxicity regulatory studies: synthesis, commentary, and recommendations
    Vorhees, Charles V.
    Makris, Susan L.
    NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 2015, 52 : 109 - 115
  • [22] REGULATORY OVERSIGHT AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOODS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
    SOMOGYI, A
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 208 : 37 - AGFD
  • [23] Occupational Safety Management in the European Union and Soft Factors in Accident Severity Assessment
    Zielinska, Anetta
    Bajdur, Wioletta
    EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 14347 - 14359
  • [24] Safety of Novel Microbes for Human Consumption: Practical Examples of Assessment in the European Union
    Brodmann, Theodor
    Endo, Akihito
    Gueimonde, Miguel
    Vinderola, Gabriel
    Kneifel, Wolfgang
    de Vos, Willem M.
    Salminen, Seppo
    Gomez-Gallego, Carlos
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [25] Food Safety Assessment: Overview of Metrological Issues and Regulatory Aspects in the European Union
    Sorbo, Angela
    Pucci, Emilia
    Nobili, Chiara
    Taglieri, Isabella
    Passeri, Daniele
    Zoani, Claudia
    SEPARATIONS, 2022, 9 (02)
  • [26] Assessment of user safety, exposure and risk to veterinary medicinal products in the European Union
    Woodward, K. N.
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 50 (01) : 114 - 128
  • [27] Biofuels as a risk management strategy for energy safety in the European Union - An assessment for Germany
    Breuer, T.
    Delzeit, R.
    Melzner, S.
    RISK, RELIABILITY AND SOCIETAL SAFETY, VOLS 1-3: VOL 1: SPECIALISATION TOPICS; VOL 2: THEMATIC TOPICS; VOL 3: APPLICATIONS TOPICS, 2007, : 2275 - +
  • [28] Flash talk: use of adverse outcome pathways as an organizing framework for integrated approaches to testing and assessment of developmental neurotoxicity of pesticides
    Paparella, M.
    Hernandez-Jerez, A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 399 : S5 - S6
  • [29] Alternative toxicological methods for establishing residue definitions applied for dietary risk assessment of pesticides in the European Union
    Czaja, Katarzyna
    Strucinski, Pawel
    Korcz, Wojciech
    Minorczyk, Maria
    Hernik, Agnieszka
    Wiadrowska, Bozena
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 137
  • [30] Progress in Eliminating One-Year Dog Studies for the Safety Assessment of Pesticides
    Spielmann, Horst
    ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING, 2019, : 50 - 56