Adhesive Bond Strength of Restorative Materials to Caries-Affected Dentin Treated with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Alfawaz, Yasser F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, POB 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
关键词
dental caries; disinfection; dental bonding; photochemotherapy; photosensitizing agents; dental cement; COMPLETE EXCAVATION; ER; CRYSGG LASER; RESIN; LESIONS; ERYAG;
D O I
10.1089/photob.2023.0037
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to caries-affected dentin (CAD) treated with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in comparison with conventional chemical disinfectants.Methods: Three databases, including the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, were searched to address the focused question: "What is the effect of aPDT compared to conventional chemical disinfection techniques on the adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to CAD?." Search keywords included "dentin*" "adhes bond*" "caries-affected dentin" "photodynamic "photochemotherapy" "photosensitizing agent" "phototherapy" "photoradiation" "laser" "light activated" "photoactivated." A fixed-effects model was used in each meta-analysis and the inverse variance was used to calculate the standard mean difference (SMD). For evaluating the statistical heterogeneity, the Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistics were used. The risk of bias was evaluated based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.Results: Fourteen studies were included in the qualitative as well as quantitative analysis. The results of the meta-analyses exhibited an SMD of 2.38% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.03-2.73; p < 0.00001], indicating a statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength scores between the tested group (samples treated with aPDT) and the control group (i.e., favoring the sound dentin and/or conventional chemical disinfectants). Contrarily, an SMD of -1.46% (95% CI: -2.04 to -0.88; p < 0.00001) and -0.37% (95% CI: -0.70 to -0.03; p = 0.03) was observed, indicating a statistically significant difference in the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS), as well as microleakage scores between the tested group (favoring the samples treated with aPDT) and the control group (i.e., sound dentin and/or conventional chemical disinfectants).Conclusions: Adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to CAD treated with conventional chemical disinfectants showed superior outcomes compared to photodynamic therapy (aPDT).
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 139
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of 2 years water aging on bond strength stability of adhesive systems to artificial caries-affected primary dentin
    Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
    Teixeira Alves, Fabiana Bucholdz
    Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
    Bissoto Calvo, Ana Flavia
    Reis, Alessandra
    Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
    Raggio, Daniela Procida
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2014, 54 : 172 - 176
  • [32] Effect of the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on microorganism reduction in deep caries lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ornellas, Pamela Oliveira
    Antunes, Leonardo Santos
    Fernandes da Costa Fontes, Karla Bianca
    Correa Povoa, Helvecio Cardoso
    Kuchler, Erika Calvano
    Pontes Iorio, Natalia Lopes
    Alves Antunes, Livia Azeredo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2016, 21 (09)
  • [33] Effect of photodynamic therapy with two photosensitizers on the microtensile bond strength of a universal adhesive to affected dentin
    Hashemikamangar, Sedighe Sadat
    Biglari, Pardis
    Shahidi, Zahra
    Chiniforush, Nasim
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2024, 48
  • [34] Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Restorative Materials Affected by Smear Layer Thickness but not Dentin Desiccation
    Latta, Mark A.
    Radniecki, Scott M.
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 22 (01): : 79 - 84
  • [35] Optimizing Adhesive Bonding to Caries Affected Dentin: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Dental Adhesive Strategies following Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal
    Mohanty, Pooja R.
    Mishra, Lora
    Saczuk, Klara
    Lapinska, Barbara
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [36] Microtensile bond strength of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems on sound and artificial caries-affected dentin
    Zanchi, Cesar Henrique
    Lund, Rafael Guerra
    Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues
    Ribeiro, Gladis Aver
    Burkert del Pino, Francisco Augusto
    Pinto, Marcia Bueno
    Demarco, Flavio Fernando
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 23 (03): : 152 - 156
  • [37] Does dentin pretreatment with chitosan improve the bond strength of restorative material? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
    Alves, Luisa Valente Gotardo Lara
    Cerqueira, Nathalia Mancioppi
    Candemil, Amanda Pelegrin
    Faria-e-Silva, Andre Luis
    Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao
    Souza-Gabriel, Aline Evangelista
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2024, 128
  • [38] Caries-affected dentin disinfection using Triphala, Indocyanine green, and Potassium Titanyl Phosphate laser and their effect on adhesive bond strength
    Kumari, Ujala
    Zafar, Tooba
    Shafqat, Shaheryar
    Askary, Syed Hussain
    Qasim, Muhammad
    Kamran, Muhammad Abdullah
    Baig, Eisha Abrar
    Shaikh, Amynah C.
    Qureshi, Ambrina
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2023, 41
  • [39] Secondary caries risk of different adhesive strategies and restorative materials in permanent teeth: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Askar, Haitham
    Krois, Joachim
    Goestemeyer, Gerd
    Schwendicke, Falk
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 104
  • [40] Effect of chlorhexidine concentrations on micro-shear bond strength of self-etch adhesive to normal and caries-affected dentin
    Mobarak, Enas H.
    El-Korashy, Dalia I.
    Pashley, David H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 23 (04): : 217 - 222