Adhesive Bond Strength of Restorative Materials to Caries-Affected Dentin Treated with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Alfawaz, Yasser F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, POB 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
关键词
dental caries; disinfection; dental bonding; photochemotherapy; photosensitizing agents; dental cement; COMPLETE EXCAVATION; ER; CRYSGG LASER; RESIN; LESIONS; ERYAG;
D O I
10.1089/photob.2023.0037
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to caries-affected dentin (CAD) treated with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in comparison with conventional chemical disinfectants.Methods: Three databases, including the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, were searched to address the focused question: "What is the effect of aPDT compared to conventional chemical disinfection techniques on the adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to CAD?." Search keywords included "dentin*" "adhes bond*" "caries-affected dentin" "photodynamic "photochemotherapy" "photosensitizing agent" "phototherapy" "photoradiation" "laser" "light activated" "photoactivated." A fixed-effects model was used in each meta-analysis and the inverse variance was used to calculate the standard mean difference (SMD). For evaluating the statistical heterogeneity, the Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistics were used. The risk of bias was evaluated based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.Results: Fourteen studies were included in the qualitative as well as quantitative analysis. The results of the meta-analyses exhibited an SMD of 2.38% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.03-2.73; p < 0.00001], indicating a statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength scores between the tested group (samples treated with aPDT) and the control group (i.e., favoring the sound dentin and/or conventional chemical disinfectants). Contrarily, an SMD of -1.46% (95% CI: -2.04 to -0.88; p < 0.00001) and -0.37% (95% CI: -0.70 to -0.03; p = 0.03) was observed, indicating a statistically significant difference in the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS), as well as microleakage scores between the tested group (favoring the samples treated with aPDT) and the control group (i.e., sound dentin and/or conventional chemical disinfectants).Conclusions: Adhesive bond strength of restorative materials to CAD treated with conventional chemical disinfectants showed superior outcomes compared to photodynamic therapy (aPDT).
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 139
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Collagen Crosslinkers on Dentin Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hardan, Louis
    Daood, Umer
    Bourgi, Rim
    Cuevas-Suarez, Carlos Enrique
    Devoto, Walter
    Zarow, Maciej
    Jakubowicz, Natalia
    Zamarripa-Calderon, Juan Eliezer
    Radwanski, Mateusz
    Orsini, Giovanna
    Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
    CELLS, 2022, 11 (15)
  • [22] Effect of dentin conditioners on dentin bond strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Shuyao
    Chen, Huan
    Lin, Qi
    Zhu, Song
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (03): : 509e1 - 509e11
  • [23] Is There a est Protocol to Optimize Bond Strength of a Universal Adhesive to Artificially Induced Caries-affected Primary or Permanent Dentin?
    Nicoloso, Gabriel Ferreira
    Antoniazzi, Bruna Feltrin
    Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
    Maxnuck Soares, Fabio Zovico
    Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 18 (05): : 441 - 446
  • [24] Effect of desensitizers on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to caries-affected dentin on the gingival wall
    Sengun, A
    Koyuturk, AE
    Sener, Y
    Ozer, F
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2005, 30 (04) : 430 - 435
  • [25] Shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive to caries-affected dentin after caries removal by Er:YAG laser
    Zhan, Zhenlin
    Wu, Weiliang
    Zhao, Haibin
    Zhang, Xianzeng
    Lin, Shi
    Xie, Shusen
    LASERS IN DENTISTRY XVIII, 2012, 8208
  • [26] Effect of Additional Acid Etching on Bond Strength and Structural Reliability of Adhesive Systems Applied to Caries-affected Dentin
    Zanchi, Cesar Henrique
    D'Avila, Otavio Pereira
    Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto
    Burnett, Luiz Henrique, Jr.
    Demarco, Flavio Fernando
    Pinto, Marcia Bueno
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 12 (02): : 109 - 115
  • [27] Effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity disinfectant on microtensile bond strength of tooth-coloured restorative materials to sound and caries-affected dentin
    Aykut-Yetkiner, Arzu
    Candan, Umit
    Ersin, Nazan
    Eronat, Cemal
    Belli, Sema
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (12) : 1169 - 1177
  • [28] Effect of adhesive air-drying time on bond strength to dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Awad, Mohamed M.
    Alrahlah, Ali
    Matinlinna, Jukka P.
    Hamama, Hamdi Hosni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2019, 90 : 154 - 162
  • [29] Impact of photodynamic therapy on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed S.
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2020, 32
  • [30] Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Dentin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hardan, Louis
    Bourgi, Rim
    Kharouf, Naji
    Mancino, Davide
    Zarow, Maciej
    Jakubowicz, Natalia
    Haikel, Youssef
    Cuevas-Suarez, Carlos Enrique
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 35