Effect of Footwear Type on Biomechanical Risk Factors for Knee Osteoarthritis

被引:1
|
作者
Malus, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Urbaczka, Jan [2 ]
Rygelova, Marketa [2 ]
Casula, Victor [3 ]
Nieminen, Miika [3 ]
Monte, Andrea [4 ]
Horka, Veronika [2 ]
Uchytil, Jaroslav [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ostrava, Dept Human Movement Studies, Moravska 3397, Ostrava 70200, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Ostrava, Human Mot Diagnost Ctr, Dept Human Movement Studies, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[3] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Oulu, Finland
[4] Univ Verona, Dept Neurosci Biomed & Movement Sci, Verona, Italy
关键词
walking; footwear; knee; osteoarthritis; minimalistic; barefoot; SPM; FUNCTIONAL DATA-ANALYSIS; BONE-MARROW LESIONS; SPECIALIZED FOOTWEAR; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BAREFOOT WALKING; MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; LOWER-EXTREMITY; GAIT; SHOES; AGE;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231183416
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Regular walking in different types of footwear may increase the mediolateral shear force, knee adduction moment, or vertical ground-reaction forces that could increase the risk of early development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose:To compare kinematic and kinetic parameters that could affect the development of knee OA in 3 footwear conditions. Study Design:Controlled laboratory study. Methods:A total of 40 asymptomatic participants performed walking trials in the laboratory at self-selected walking speeds under barefoot (BF), minimalistic (MF), and neutral (NF) footwear conditions. Knee joint parameters were described using discrete point values, and continuous curves were evaluated using statistical parametric mapping. A 3 x 1 repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the main effect of footwear for both discrete and continuous data. To compare differences between footwear conditions, a post hoc paired t test was used. Results:Discrete point analyses showed a significantly greater knee power in NF compared with MF and BF in the weight absorption phase (P < .001 for both). Statistical parametric mapping analysis indicated a significantly greater knee angle in the sagittal plane at the end of the propulsive phase in BF compared with NF and MF (P = .043). Knee joint moment was significantly greater in the propulsive phase for the sagittal (P = .038) and frontal planes (P = .035) in BF compared with NF and MF and in the absorption phase in the sagittal plane (P = .034) in BF compared with MF and NF. A significant main effect of footwear was found for anteroposterior (propulsion, & UARR;MF, NF, & DARR;BF [P = .008]; absorption, & UARR;BF, MF, & DARR;NF [P = .001]), mediolateral (propulsion, & UARR;MF, NF, & DARR;BF [P = .005]; absorption, & UARR;NF, MF, & DARR;BF [P = .044]), and vertical (propulsion, & UARR;NF, BF, & DARR;MF [P = .001]; absorption, & UARR;MF, BF, & DARR;NF [P < .001]) ground-reaction forces. Knee power showed a significant main effect of footwear (absorption, & UARR;NF, MF, & DARR;BF [P = .015]; propulsion, & UARR;MF, NF, & DARR;BF [P = .039]). Conclusion:Walking in MF without sufficient accommodation affected kinetic and kinematic parameters and could increase the risk of early development of knee OA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reviewing knee osteoarthritis - a biomechanical perspective
    Jackson, BD
    Wluka, A
    Teichtahl, AJ
    Morris, ME
    Cicuttini, FM
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2004, 7 (03) : 347 - 357
  • [42] Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee
    Heijink, Andras
    Gomoll, Andreas H.
    Madry, Henning
    Drobnic, Matej
    Filardo, Giuseppe
    Espregueira-Mendes, Joao
    Van Dijk, C. Niek
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2012, 20 (03) : 423 - 435
  • [43] Biomechanical risk factors for knee osteoarthritis and lower back pain in lower limb amputees: protocol for a systematic review
    Wade, Logan
    McGuigan, M. Polly
    McKay, Carly
    Bilzon, James
    Seminati, Elena
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [44] Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee
    Andras Heijink
    Andreas H. Gomoll
    Henning Madry
    Matej Drobnič
    Giuseppe Filardo
    João Espregueira-Mendes
    C. Niek Van Dijk
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012, 20 : 423 - 435
  • [45] Conservative biomechanical strategies for knee osteoarthritis
    Reeves, Neil D.
    Bowling, Frank L.
    NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY, 2011, 7 (02) : 113 - 122
  • [46] Effects of specialized footwear on joint loads in osteoarthritis of the knee
    Shakoor, Najia
    Lidtke, Roy H.
    Sengupta, Mondira
    Fogg, Louis F.
    Block, Joel A.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (09): : 1214 - 1220
  • [47] Exercise, Gait Retraining, Footwear and Insoles for Knee Osteoarthritis
    Hinman R.S.
    Hunt M.A.
    Simic M.
    Bennell K.L.
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2013, 1 (1) : 21 - 28
  • [48] Effects of Common Footwear on Joint Loading in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
    Shakoor, Najia
    Sengupta, Mondira
    Foucher, Kharma C.
    Wimmer, Markus A.
    Fogg, Louis F.
    Block, Joel A.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2010, 62 (07) : 917 - 923
  • [49] EFFECT OF SHOCK ABSORBING INSOLES ON BIOMECHANICAL AND CLINICAL ASPECTS OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
    De Vincenzo, A.
    Apps, A.
    Cooney, T.
    MacKenzie, M.
    Turpin, K.
    Chang, R.
    Hunt, M. A.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2011, 19 : S224 - S224
  • [50] Effect of Shock Absorbing Insoles on Biomechanical and Clinical Aspects of Knee Osteoarthritis
    Hunt, Michael
    De Vincenzo, Adrian
    Turpin, Kevin
    Apps, Amy
    Cooney, Thea
    MacKenzie, Megan
    Chang, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 39 (08) : 1716 - 1717