Effect of Footwear Type on Biomechanical Risk Factors for Knee Osteoarthritis

被引:1
|
作者
Malus, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Urbaczka, Jan [2 ]
Rygelova, Marketa [2 ]
Casula, Victor [3 ]
Nieminen, Miika [3 ]
Monte, Andrea [4 ]
Horka, Veronika [2 ]
Uchytil, Jaroslav [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ostrava, Dept Human Movement Studies, Moravska 3397, Ostrava 70200, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Ostrava, Human Mot Diagnost Ctr, Dept Human Movement Studies, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[3] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Oulu, Finland
[4] Univ Verona, Dept Neurosci Biomed & Movement Sci, Verona, Italy
关键词
walking; footwear; knee; osteoarthritis; minimalistic; barefoot; SPM; FUNCTIONAL DATA-ANALYSIS; BONE-MARROW LESIONS; SPECIALIZED FOOTWEAR; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BAREFOOT WALKING; MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; LOWER-EXTREMITY; GAIT; SHOES; AGE;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231183416
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Regular walking in different types of footwear may increase the mediolateral shear force, knee adduction moment, or vertical ground-reaction forces that could increase the risk of early development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose:To compare kinematic and kinetic parameters that could affect the development of knee OA in 3 footwear conditions. Study Design:Controlled laboratory study. Methods:A total of 40 asymptomatic participants performed walking trials in the laboratory at self-selected walking speeds under barefoot (BF), minimalistic (MF), and neutral (NF) footwear conditions. Knee joint parameters were described using discrete point values, and continuous curves were evaluated using statistical parametric mapping. A 3 x 1 repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the main effect of footwear for both discrete and continuous data. To compare differences between footwear conditions, a post hoc paired t test was used. Results:Discrete point analyses showed a significantly greater knee power in NF compared with MF and BF in the weight absorption phase (P < .001 for both). Statistical parametric mapping analysis indicated a significantly greater knee angle in the sagittal plane at the end of the propulsive phase in BF compared with NF and MF (P = .043). Knee joint moment was significantly greater in the propulsive phase for the sagittal (P = .038) and frontal planes (P = .035) in BF compared with NF and MF and in the absorption phase in the sagittal plane (P = .034) in BF compared with MF and NF. A significant main effect of footwear was found for anteroposterior (propulsion, & UARR;MF, NF, & DARR;BF [P = .008]; absorption, & UARR;BF, MF, & DARR;NF [P = .001]), mediolateral (propulsion, & UARR;MF, NF, & DARR;BF [P = .005]; absorption, & UARR;NF, MF, & DARR;BF [P = .044]), and vertical (propulsion, & UARR;NF, BF, & DARR;MF [P = .001]; absorption, & UARR;MF, BF, & DARR;NF [P < .001]) ground-reaction forces. Knee power showed a significant main effect of footwear (absorption, & UARR;NF, MF, & DARR;BF [P = .015]; propulsion, & UARR;MF, NF, & DARR;BF [P = .039]). Conclusion:Walking in MF without sufficient accommodation affected kinetic and kinematic parameters and could increase the risk of early development of knee OA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Biomechanical Footwear for Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
    Lei, Yiting
    Cui, Danli
    Huang, Wei
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (13): : 1351 - 1351
  • [12] Risk Factors for Osteoarthritis of the Knee
    不详
    ORTHOPADE, 2015, 44 (09): : 725 - 725
  • [13] Special Issue on Biomechanical and Biomedical Factors of Knee Osteoarthritis
    Nagano, Hanatsu
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (22):
  • [14] BENEFIC EFFECT OF THE USE OF FLEXIBLE AND MINIMALIST FOOTWEAR ON KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Trombini-Souza, Francis
    Yokota, Mariane
    Matias, Alessandra
    Goldenstein-Schainberg, Claudia
    Fuller, Ricardo
    Sacco, Isabel C. N.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 : S355 - S356
  • [15] PROGNOSTIC RISK FACTORS FOR KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Popova, V.
    Batalov, A.
    Vajev, Z.
    Yakov, I.
    Ronchev, I.
    Geneva-Popova, M.
    Peeva, J.
    Karalilova, R.
    Todorov, P.
    Selimov, P.
    Stoyanova, L.
    Alimanska, S.
    Tersyiska, S.
    Batalov, Z.
    Zelyaskova, M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 : S271 - S271
  • [16] Risk factors for progression of knee osteoarthritis
    Doherty, M
    LANCET, 2001, 358 (9284): : 775 - 776
  • [17] RISK-FACTORS OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE
    HERRMANN, J
    HOFMANN, G
    GLUCKERT, K
    STARK, W
    WIRTZ, P
    WESELOH, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1992, 31 : 119 - 119
  • [18] AETIOLOGY OF EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE; BIOMECHANICAL OR BIOCHEMICAL FACTORS?
    Wiegant, K.
    Beekhuizen, M.
    Mastbergen, S. C.
    Batten-van Rijbroek, A. D.
    Creemers, L. B.
    Saris, D. B.
    Lafeber, F. P.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 : S131 - S132
  • [19] BIOMECHANICAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    van Tunen, J. A.
    Dell'Isola, A.
    Juhl, C.
    Dekker, J.
    Steultjens, M.
    Lund, H.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2016, 24 : S121 - S121
  • [20] AETIOLOGY OF EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE; BIOMECHANICAL OR BIOCHEMICAL FACTORS?
    Wiegant, K.
    Beekhuizen, M.
    Mastbergen, S. C.
    Barten-van Rijbroek, A. D.
    Creemers, L. B.
    Saris, D. B.
    Lafeber, F. P.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2013, 71 : 420 - 420