Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Ning [1 ]
Chen, Linmu [2 ]
Liu, Lulu [3 ]
Rong, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Dept Pain Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0278846
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases, as well as dissertations and conference papers, to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension before August 23, 2021. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic profiles, surgical field score, and blood loss. Extubation time, sedation and pain score at the PACU, and perioperative adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials with 543 patients (272 in the dexmedetomidine group and 271 in the remifentanil group) were eventually included. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in terms of surgical field score, blood loss, minimum values of mean arterial pressure (MD 0.24 with 95% CI [-1.65, 2.13], P = 0.80, I-2 = 66%) and heart rate (MD 0.42 [-1.33, 2.17], P = 0.64, I-2 = 40%), sedation scores at the PACU (MD -0.09 [-0.69, 0.50], P = 0.76, I-2 = 92%), and incidence of bradycardia (OR 2.24 [0.70, 7.15], P = 0.17, I-2 = 0%). Compared with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine as the controlled hypotensive agent showed a lower visual analogue score at the PACU (MD -1.01 [-1.25, -0.77], P<0.00001, I-2 = 0%) and incidence of shivering (OR 0.22 [0.08, 0.60], P = 0.003, I-2 = 0%), nausea, and vomiting (OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.89], P = 0.03, I-2 = 0%). However, extubation time was shorter in the remifentanil group (MD 3.34 [0.75, 5.93], P = 0.01, I-2 = 90%). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are both effective in providing satisfactory controlled hypotension and surgical conditions. Dexmedetomidine is better in easing postoperative pain at the PACU and reducing the occurrence of shivering, nausea, and vomiting. Meanwhile, remifentanil is a fast-track anesthesia with a shorter extubation time. Given the limitations of this meta-analysis, further studies are needed for a more definitive comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Parturients' hemodynamics depression evaluation comparison of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Barreto, L. A. L.
    Ferreira, P., V
    Pinheiro, A. P. S.
    Monteiro, S. B.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 20S - 20S
  • [42] Remifentanil in electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yoshiteru Takekita
    Taro Suwa
    Naotaka Sunada
    Hirotsugu Kawashima
    Chiara Fabbri
    Masaki Kato
    Aran Tajika
    Toshihiko Kinoshita
    Toshi A. Furukawa
    Alessandro Serretti
    European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2016, 266 : 703 - 717
  • [43] Mepivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Random Controlled Trials
    Tan, Haifeng
    Wan, Teng
    Guo, Weiming
    Fan, Gang
    Xie, Yu
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (05) : 2151 - 2164
  • [44] Mepivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Random Controlled Trials
    Haifeng Tan
    Teng Wan
    Weiming Guo
    Gang Fan
    Yu Xie
    Advances in Therapy, 2022, 39 : 2151 - 2164
  • [45] Comparison of the recovery profile of sufentanil and remifentanil in total intravenous anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cuiabano, Igor Seror
    Naves, Rafael Pagliaro
    Diehl, Rodrigo Bouchabki de A.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 75 (01):
  • [46] Regional versus general anesthesia in older patients for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sheng-Liang Zhou
    Shao-Yun Zhang
    Hai-Bo Si
    Bin Shen
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [47] Regional versus general anesthesia in older patients for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhou, Sheng-Liang
    Zhang, Shao-Yun
    Si, Hai-Bo
    Shen, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [48] The efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lei, Xiuzhen
    Yu, Yang
    Li, Mei
    Fang, Peng
    Gan, Shuyuan
    Yao, Yongxing
    Zhou, Yanfeng
    Kang, Xianhui
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [49] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil infusion for controlled hypotension in shoulder arthroscopy: a comparative study
    Menshawi, Mohammed Abdelsalam
    Fahim, Hany Magdy
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [50] Remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia on intrapartum maternal fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guolin Lu
    Wenshui Yao
    Xiaofen Chen
    Sujing Zhang
    Min Zhou
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20