Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Ning [1 ]
Chen, Linmu [2 ]
Liu, Lulu [3 ]
Rong, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Dept Pain Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0278846
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases, as well as dissertations and conference papers, to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension before August 23, 2021. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic profiles, surgical field score, and blood loss. Extubation time, sedation and pain score at the PACU, and perioperative adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials with 543 patients (272 in the dexmedetomidine group and 271 in the remifentanil group) were eventually included. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in terms of surgical field score, blood loss, minimum values of mean arterial pressure (MD 0.24 with 95% CI [-1.65, 2.13], P = 0.80, I-2 = 66%) and heart rate (MD 0.42 [-1.33, 2.17], P = 0.64, I-2 = 40%), sedation scores at the PACU (MD -0.09 [-0.69, 0.50], P = 0.76, I-2 = 92%), and incidence of bradycardia (OR 2.24 [0.70, 7.15], P = 0.17, I-2 = 0%). Compared with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine as the controlled hypotensive agent showed a lower visual analogue score at the PACU (MD -1.01 [-1.25, -0.77], P<0.00001, I-2 = 0%) and incidence of shivering (OR 0.22 [0.08, 0.60], P = 0.003, I-2 = 0%), nausea, and vomiting (OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.89], P = 0.03, I-2 = 0%). However, extubation time was shorter in the remifentanil group (MD 3.34 [0.75, 5.93], P = 0.01, I-2 = 90%). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are both effective in providing satisfactory controlled hypotension and surgical conditions. Dexmedetomidine is better in easing postoperative pain at the PACU and reducing the occurrence of shivering, nausea, and vomiting. Meanwhile, remifentanil is a fast-track anesthesia with a shorter extubation time. Given the limitations of this meta-analysis, further studies are needed for a more definitive comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on mothers and neonates during cesarean section under general anesthesia
    Yu, Zhiqiang
    Zhang, Peijun
    Wang, Haiyun
    Zhang, Li
    Wei, Wei
    Fang, Wenqian
    Mu, Xingbo
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2020, 164 (04): : 417 - 424
  • [32] Local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mathew, Christopher
    Wong, Theodore G. L.
    Leong, Rachel W. L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2024, 71 (04): : 561 - 562
  • [33] Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhang, Xu
    Wang, Dong
    Shi, Min
    Luo, YuanGuo
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2017, 37 (04) : 343 - 354
  • [34] Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu Zhang
    Dong Wang
    Min Shi
    YuanGuo Luo
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2017, 37 : 343 - 354
  • [35] The impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on the variability of surgical times: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Taborsky, Andrea
    Dexter, Franklin
    Novak, Alexander
    Espy, Jennifer L.
    Sondekoppam, Rakesh V.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2025, 72 (01): : 91 - 105
  • [36] Local Versus General Anesthesia for the Management of Nasal Bone Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed
    Ellis, Edward
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (04) : 606 - 615
  • [37] Effects of hypercapnia versus normocapnia during general anesthesia on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Petran, Jan
    Ansems, Kelly
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Marx, Gernot
    Kalvelage, Christina
    Kopp, Rudger
    Benstoem, Carina
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 72 (03): : 398 - 406
  • [38] The use of remimazolam versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ko, Ching-Chung
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Illias, Amina M.
    Chiu, Chong-Chi
    Yu, Chia-Hung
    Lin, Chien-Ming
    Chen, I-Wen
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Postoperative Pain in Vitreoretinal Surgery With Combined Regional-General Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Su, Yu-chen
    Su, Yu-chi
    Hsu, Sheng-min
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 271 : 60 - 70
  • [40] Remifentanil in electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Takekita, Yoshiteru
    Suwa, Taro
    Sunada, Naotaka
    Kawashima, Hirotsugu
    Fabbri, Chiara
    Kato, Masaki
    Tajika, Aran
    Kinoshita, Toshihiko
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Serretti, Alessandro
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 266 (08) : 703 - 717