Spectral Characteristics of the Dynamic World Land Cover Classification

被引:3
|
作者
Small, Christopher [1 ]
Sousa, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Sentinel-2; Dynamic World; land cover classification; deep learning; spectral mixture model; characterization; feature space; spectral dimensionality;
D O I
10.3390/rs15030575
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Dynamic World product is a discrete land cover classification of Sentinel 2 reflectance imagery that is global in extent, retrospective to 2015, and updated continuously in near real time. The classifier is trained on a stratified random sample of 20,000 hand-labeled 5 x 5 km Sentinel 2 tiles spanning 14 biomes globally. Since the training data are based on visual interpretation of image composites by both expert and non-expert annotators, without explicit spectral properties specified in the class definitions, the spectral characteristics of the classes are not obvious. The objective of this study is to quantify the physical distinctions among the land cover classes by characterizing the spectral properties of the range of reflectance present within each of the Dynamic World classes over a variety of landscapes. This is achieved by comparing both the eight-class probability feature space (excluding snow) and the maximum probability class assignment (label) distributions to continuous land cover fraction estimates derived from a globally standardized spectral mixture model. Standardized substrate, vegetation, and dark (SVD) endmembers are used to unmix nine Sentinel 2 reflectance tiles from nine spectral diversity hotspots for comparison between the SVD land cover fraction continua and the Dynamic World class probability continua and class assignments. The variance partition for the class probability feature spaces indicates that eight of these nine hotspots are effectively five-dimensional to 95% of variance. Class probability feature spaces of the hotspots all show a tetrahedral form with probability continua spanning multiple classes. Comparison of SVD land cover fraction distributions with maximum probability class assignments (labels) and probability feature space distributions reveal a clear distinction between (1) physically and spectrally heterogeneous biomes characterized by continuous gradations in vegetation density, substrate albedo, and structural shadow fractions, and (2) more homogeneous biomes characterized by closed canopy vegetation (forest) or negligible vegetation cover (e.g., desert, water). Due to the ubiquity of spectrally heterogeneous biomes worldwide, the class probability feature space adds considerable value to the Dynamic World maximum probability class labels by offering users the opportunity to depict inherently gradational heterogeneous landscapes otherwise not generally offered with other discrete thematic classifications.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Land cover classification for Siberia leveraging diverse global land cover datasets
    Beak, Munseon
    Ichii, Kazuhito
    Yamamoto, Yuhei
    Wang, Ruci
    Zhang, Beichen
    Sharma, Ram C.
    Hiyama, Tetsuya
    PROGRESS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [32] Interpretable Approaches for Land Use and Land Cover Classification
    Osias, Ana C. F.
    Schaefer, Mariana A. R.
    Veloso, Gustavo V.
    de Oliveira, Hugo N.
    Reis, Julio C. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS, SBSI 2024, 2024,
  • [33] Land use - Land cover classification for the island of Cephalonia
    Vassilopoulos, A
    Gournelos, T
    Evelpidou, N
    PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT VI, VOLS I - III, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 1761 - 1768
  • [34] HYPERSPECTRAL DATA FOR LAND USE/LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION
    Vijayan, Divya V.
    Shankar, G. Ravi
    Shankar, T. Ravi
    ISPRS TECHNICAL COMMISSION VIII SYMPOSIUM, 2014, 40-8 : 991 - 995
  • [35] A Hybrid Approach for Land Use/Land Cover Classification
    Tang, Yanbing
    Pannell, Clifton W.
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 46 (04) : 365 - 387
  • [36] Texture classification of Mediterranean land cover
    Berberoglu, S.
    Curran, P. J.
    Lloyd, C. D.
    Atkinson, P. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2007, 9 (03): : 322 - 334
  • [37] Random Forests for land cover classification
    Gislason, PO
    Benediktsson, JA
    Sveinsson, JR
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2006, 27 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [38] Random forests for land cover classification
    Pal, M
    IGARSS 2003: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS I - VII, PROCEEDINGS: LEARNING FROM EARTH'S SHAPES AND SIZES, 2003, : 3510 - 3512
  • [39] Expert system for land cover classification
    Kartikeyan, B., 1600, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, United States (33):
  • [40] Targeted Land-Cover Classification
    Marconcini, Mattia
    Fernandez-Prieto, Diego
    Buchholz, Tim
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 52 (07): : 4173 - 4193