Spectral Characteristics of the Dynamic World Land Cover Classification

被引:3
|
作者
Small, Christopher [1 ]
Sousa, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Sentinel-2; Dynamic World; land cover classification; deep learning; spectral mixture model; characterization; feature space; spectral dimensionality;
D O I
10.3390/rs15030575
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Dynamic World product is a discrete land cover classification of Sentinel 2 reflectance imagery that is global in extent, retrospective to 2015, and updated continuously in near real time. The classifier is trained on a stratified random sample of 20,000 hand-labeled 5 x 5 km Sentinel 2 tiles spanning 14 biomes globally. Since the training data are based on visual interpretation of image composites by both expert and non-expert annotators, without explicit spectral properties specified in the class definitions, the spectral characteristics of the classes are not obvious. The objective of this study is to quantify the physical distinctions among the land cover classes by characterizing the spectral properties of the range of reflectance present within each of the Dynamic World classes over a variety of landscapes. This is achieved by comparing both the eight-class probability feature space (excluding snow) and the maximum probability class assignment (label) distributions to continuous land cover fraction estimates derived from a globally standardized spectral mixture model. Standardized substrate, vegetation, and dark (SVD) endmembers are used to unmix nine Sentinel 2 reflectance tiles from nine spectral diversity hotspots for comparison between the SVD land cover fraction continua and the Dynamic World class probability continua and class assignments. The variance partition for the class probability feature spaces indicates that eight of these nine hotspots are effectively five-dimensional to 95% of variance. Class probability feature spaces of the hotspots all show a tetrahedral form with probability continua spanning multiple classes. Comparison of SVD land cover fraction distributions with maximum probability class assignments (labels) and probability feature space distributions reveal a clear distinction between (1) physically and spectrally heterogeneous biomes characterized by continuous gradations in vegetation density, substrate albedo, and structural shadow fractions, and (2) more homogeneous biomes characterized by closed canopy vegetation (forest) or negligible vegetation cover (e.g., desert, water). Due to the ubiquity of spectrally heterogeneous biomes worldwide, the class probability feature space adds considerable value to the Dynamic World maximum probability class labels by offering users the opportunity to depict inherently gradational heterogeneous landscapes otherwise not generally offered with other discrete thematic classifications.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION IN ALBANIA
    Nikolli, Pal
    100 YEARS ISPRS ADVANCING REMOTE SENSING SCIENCE, PT 2, 2010, 38 : 412 - 416
  • [22] 10-METER RESOLUTION LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION MAPPING USING SENTINEL-1 & 2 AND DYNAMIC WORLD
    Tsutsumida, Narumasa
    Nasahara, Kenlo
    Tadono, Takeo
    Birch, Tanya
    Erickson, Tyler
    IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 2954 - 2957
  • [23] COMPARISON OF HYPERSPECTRAL AND MULTI-SPECTRAL IMAGERY TO BUILDING A SPECTRAL LIBRARY AND LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE
    Boori, M. S.
    Paringer, R.
    Choudhary, K.
    Kupriyanov, A.
    COMPUTER OPTICS, 2018, 42 (06) : 1035 - 1045
  • [24] Semi-supervised Classification of Land Cover in Multi-spectral Images Using Spectral Slopes
    Aswatha, Shashaank M.
    Mukhopadhyay, Jayanta
    Biswas, Prabir K.
    2017 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICAPR), 2017, : 338 - 343
  • [25] THE USE OF LAND COVER CHANGE LIKELIHOOD FOR IMPROVING LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION
    Reis, Mariane S.
    Sant'Anna, Sidnei J. S.
    Dutra, Luciano V.
    Escada, Maria Isabel S.
    Pantaleao, Eliana
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2017, : 3222 - 3225
  • [26] Land cover mapping based on random forest classification of multitemporal spectral and thermal images
    Vahid Eisavi
    Saeid Homayouni
    Ahmad Maleknezhad Yazdi
    Abbas Alimohammadi
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187
  • [27] Land cover mapping based on random forest classification of multitemporal spectral and thermal images
    Eisavi, Vahid
    Homayouni, Saeid
    Yazdi, Ahmad Maleknezhad
    Alimohammadi, Abbas
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2015, 187 (05) : 1 - 14
  • [28] Dynamic Linear Classifier System for Hyperspectral Image Classification for Land Cover Mapping
    Damodaran, Bharath Bhushan
    Nidamanuri, Rama Rao
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 7 (06) : 2080 - 2093
  • [29] Differences of Image Classification Techniques for Land Use and Land Cover Classification
    Mahmon, Nur Anis
    Ya'acob, Norsuzila
    Yusof, Azita Laily
    2015 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING & ITS APPLICATIONS (CSPA 2015), 2015, : 90 - 94
  • [30] An inclusive classification optimization model for land use and land cover classification
    Ma, Li
    Li, Xuan
    Hou, Jianwei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):