Monitoring and apportioning sources of indoor air quality using low-cost particulate matter sensors

被引:28
|
作者
Bousiotis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Alconcel, Leah-Nani S. [2 ]
Beddows, David C. S. [1 ]
Harrison, Roy M. [1 ,3 ]
Pope, Francis D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Div Environm Hlth & Risk Management, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Met & Mat, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Excellence Environm Studies, Dept Environm Sci, POB 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Particulate matter; Source apportionment; Indoor air quality; Exposure; Infiltration; PM2; 5; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; INDOOR/OUTDOOR RELATIONSHIPS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; BACKGROUND SITE; POLLUTION; URBAN; PARTICLES; PM2.5; HOMES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2023.107907
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Air quality is one of the most important factors in public health. While outdoor air quality is widely studied, the indoor environment has been less scrutinised, even though time spent indoors is typically much greater than outdoors. The emergence of low-cost sensors can help assess indoor air quality. This study provides a new methodology, utilizing low-cost sensors and source apportionment techniques, to understand the relative importance of indoor and outdoor air pollution sources upon indoor air quality. The methodology is tested with three sensors placed in different rooms inside an exemplar house (bedroom, kitchen and office) and one out-doors. When the family was present, the bedroom had the highest average concentrations for PM2.5 and PM10 (3.9 +/- 6.8 ug/m3 and 9.6 +/- 12.7 mu g/m3 respectively), due to the activities undertaken there and the presence of softer furniture and carpeting. The kitchen, while presenting the lowest PM concentrations for both size ranges (2.8 +/- 5.9 ug/m3 and 4.2 +/- 6.9 mu g/m3 respectively), presented the highest PM spikes, especially during cooking times. Increased ventilation in the office resulted in the highest PM1 concentration (1.6 +/- 1.9 mu g/m3), high-lighting the strong effect of infiltration of outdoor air for the smallest particles. Source apportionment, via positive matrix factorisation (PMF), showed that up to 95 % of the PM1 was found to be of outdoor sources in all the rooms. This effect was reduced as particle size increased, with outdoor sources contributing >65 % of the PM2.5, and up to 50 % of the PM10, depending on the room studied. The new approach to elucidate the con-tributions of different sources to total indoor air pollution exposure, described in this paper, is easily scalable and translatable to different indoor locations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Calibration of Low-cost Gas Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring
    Margaritis, Dimitris
    Keramydas, Christos
    Papachristos, Ioannis
    Lambropoulou, Dimitra
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (11)
  • [22] Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring
    Karagulian, Federico
    Barbiere, Maurizio
    Kotsev, Alexander
    Spinelle, Laurent
    Gerboles, Michel
    Lagler, Friedrich
    Redon, Nathalie
    Crunaire, Sabine
    Borowiak, Annette
    ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (09)
  • [23] Using Low-Cost Sensors for Measuring and Monitoring Particulate Matter with a Focus on Fine and Ultrafine Particles
    Kiresova, Simona
    Guzan, Milan
    Sobota, Branislav
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (02)
  • [24] An analysis of degradation in low-cost particulate matter sensors
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Barkjohn, Karoline
    Clements, Andrea
    Lee, Jenny
    Kahn, Ralph
    Crawford, Ben
    Kinney, Patrick
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ATMOSPHERES, 2023, 3 (03): : 521 - 536
  • [25] Evaluation methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Bean, Jeffrey K.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (11) : 7369 - 7379
  • [26] Performance Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors
    Marinov, Marin B.
    Hensel, Stefan
    Ganev, Borislav
    Nikolov, Georgi
    2017 XXVI INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRONICS (ET), 2017,
  • [27] Airsense - Low-Cost Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Wireless System
    Marques, Rafael
    Goncalves, Celestino
    Ferreira, Rui
    NEW TRENDS IN DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, TECH ETHICS, AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DITTET 2024, 2024, 1459 : 269 - 280
  • [28] Indoor Air Quality Assessment Using Low-cost Commercial Off-the-Shelf Sensors
    Marinov, Marin B.
    Ganev, Borislav T.
    Nikolov, Dimitar N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENT - FRIENDLY ENERGIES AND APPLICATIONS (EFEA 2021), 2021,
  • [29] Low-Cost Sensor Node for Air Quality Monitoring: Field Tests and Validation of Particulate Matter Measurements
    Schilt, Ueli
    Barahona, Braulio
    Buck, Roger
    Meyer, Patrick
    Kappani, Prince
    Mockli, Yannis
    Meyer, Markus
    Schuetz, Philipp
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (02)
  • [30] Utilizing Low-Cost Sensors to Monitor Indoor Air Quality in Mongolian Gers
    Flowerday, Callum E.
    Lundrigan, Philip
    Kitras, Christopher
    Nguyen, Tu
    Hansen, Jaron C.
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (18)