Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Lin, Haomin [1 ]
Zhang, Jinchang [1 ]
Li, Xujia [1 ]
Li, Yuanquan [2 ]
Su, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg Hepatobiliary Surg, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Network meta-analysis; Gallbladder diseases; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SITE CHOLECYSTECTOMY; PORT; MULTICENTER; COSMESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-022-01387-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Benign gallbladder diseases are common in surgery department, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for benign diseases of gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is conventionally performed using four laparoscopic ports. However, the clinical application of different LCs is equivocal and there is no comprehensive comparison to explore which surgical options could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases. A network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of the different LCs could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases by comprehensive comparison. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochran Library. Totally, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1627) met study selection criteria and were incorporated in this NMA study. The first ranking probabilities of the five surgical options to alleviate postoperative pain scores were: 54.4% for single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC), 25.2% for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SALC), and 24.9% for mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Mini). The first ranking probabilities for reducing postoperative complications in the surgical options were: 61.3% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 21.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing hospital stay(days) in the surgical options were: 32.3% for SIRC, 29.0% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 19.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing operation time showed that the three-port technique had the shortest operation time, followed by three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (51.3%), four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (26.8%), and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (21.6%). Our study found that the optimal surgical plan for different outcomes varies, making it difficult to give a comprehensive recommendation. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be the best options in terms of reducing surgical complications and operative time. Meanwhile, SIRC is the best options for relieving postoperative pain relief. SIRC and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce hospital stay (days) compared other LCs.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aly, Omar E.
    Black, Douglas H.
    Rehman, Haroon
    Ahmed, Irfan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 35 : 120 - 128
  • [42] Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aly, O.
    Black, D.
    Rehman, H.
    Ahmed, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 194 - 194
  • [43] Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Lee, Sung Ryol
    Kim, Hyung Ook
    Shin, Jun Ho
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 62 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [44] Prospective randomized comparison of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with new facilitating maneuver vs. conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Aktimur, Recep
    Guzel, Kerim
    Cetinkunar, Suleyman
    Yildirim, Kadir
    Colak, Elif
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 32 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [45] Single-incision versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Jiang-ming
    Geng, Wei
    Xie, Sheng-xue
    Liu, Fu-bao
    Zhao, Yi-jun
    Yu, Li-quan
    Geng, Xiao-ping
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 24 (04) : 195 - 203
  • [46] Cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery with a new SILS port
    Ito, Masahiro
    Asano, Yukio
    Horiguchi, Akihiko
    Shimizu, Tomohiro
    Yamamoto, Toshiyuki
    Uyama, Ichiro
    Miyakawa, Shuichi
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2010, 17 (05) : 688 - 691
  • [47] Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Cholecystectomy
    Fatima Khambaty
    Fred Brody
    Khashayar Vaziri
    Claire Edwards
    World Journal of Surgery, 2011, 35 : 967 - 972
  • [48] Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Cholecystectomy
    Khambaty, Fatima
    Brody, Fred
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Edwards, Claire
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (05) : 967 - 972
  • [49] Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Glove Port in Comparison With Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy SILC Using Glove Port
    Barband, Alireza
    Fakhree, Mohammad Bassir A.
    Kakaei, Farzad
    Daryani, Amir
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (01): : 17 - 20
  • [50] Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Zhanhui
    Huang, Xinyu
    Zheng, Qi
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 82 (12) : 885 - 889