Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Lin, Haomin [1 ]
Zhang, Jinchang [1 ]
Li, Xujia [1 ]
Li, Yuanquan [2 ]
Su, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg Hepatobiliary Surg, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Network meta-analysis; Gallbladder diseases; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SITE CHOLECYSTECTOMY; PORT; MULTICENTER; COSMESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-022-01387-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Benign gallbladder diseases are common in surgery department, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for benign diseases of gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is conventionally performed using four laparoscopic ports. However, the clinical application of different LCs is equivocal and there is no comprehensive comparison to explore which surgical options could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases. A network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of the different LCs could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases by comprehensive comparison. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochran Library. Totally, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1627) met study selection criteria and were incorporated in this NMA study. The first ranking probabilities of the five surgical options to alleviate postoperative pain scores were: 54.4% for single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC), 25.2% for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SALC), and 24.9% for mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Mini). The first ranking probabilities for reducing postoperative complications in the surgical options were: 61.3% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 21.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing hospital stay(days) in the surgical options were: 32.3% for SIRC, 29.0% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 19.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing operation time showed that the three-port technique had the shortest operation time, followed by three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (51.3%), four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (26.8%), and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (21.6%). Our study found that the optimal surgical plan for different outcomes varies, making it difficult to give a comprehensive recommendation. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be the best options in terms of reducing surgical complications and operative time. Meanwhile, SIRC is the best options for relieving postoperative pain relief. SIRC and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce hospital stay (days) compared other LCs.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of robotic single-incision and traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Gustafson, Monica
    Lescouflair, Tariq
    Kimball, Randall
    Daoud, Ibrahim
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (06): : 2276 - 2280
  • [22] A comparison of robotic single-incision and traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Monica Gustafson
    Tariq Lescouflair
    Randall Kimball
    Ibrahim Daoud
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 2276 - 2280
  • [23] Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution
    F. Paul Buckley
    Hannah Vassaur
    Sharon Monsivais
    Nicole E. Sharp
    Daniel Jupiter
    Rob Watson
    John Eckford
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 30 - 35
  • [24] Early Postoperative Results of Single-Incision Laparascopic Cholecystectomy Versus Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Alekberzade, Aftandil
    Lypnitskiy, Evgeniy
    Sundukov, Igor
    Badalov, Jeyhun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S14 - S14
  • [25] Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution
    Buckley, F. Paul, III
    Vassaur, Hannah
    Monsivais, Sharon
    Sharp, Nicole E.
    Jupiter, Daniel
    Watson, Rob
    Eckford, John
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [26] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Biebl, Matthias
    Laimer, Elisabeth
    Klaus, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (01) : 139 - 139
  • [27] SINGLE-INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    Gupta, Nikhil
    Arora, Mohinder P.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (12) : 855 - 855
  • [28] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Thompson, K.
    Spivack, A.
    Fischer, L.
    Wong, B.
    Jacobsen, G.
    Talamini, M.
    Horgan, S.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (05): : 1664 - 1664
  • [29] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    K. Thompson
    A. Spivack
    L. Fischer
    B. Wong
    G. Jacobsen
    M. Talamini
    S. Horgan
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 1664 - 1664
  • [30] The First Additional Port During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Lee, Ju-Hee
    Kim, Gangmi
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2020, 24 (02) : 1 - 8