Segmental bile duct resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal third bile duct cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

被引:2
|
作者
Fleming, Andrew M. [1 ,8 ]
Phillips, Alisa L. [2 ]
Hendrick, Leah E. [1 ]
Drake, Justin A. [3 ]
Dickson, Paxton V. [4 ]
Glazer, Evan S. [4 ]
Shibata, David [4 ]
Cleary, Sean P. [5 ]
Yakoub, Danny [6 ]
Deneve, Jeremiah L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Memphis, TN USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Div Gastrointestinal Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Augusta, GA USA
[7] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Div Surg Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[8] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, 910 Madison Ave, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Data regarding oncologic outcomes of segmental bile duct resection (SBDR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for bile duct cancers (BDC) are conflicting. We compared SBDR and PD for BDC utilizing pooled data analysis.Materials and methods: A comprehensive PRISMA 2020 systematic review was performed. Studies comparing SBDR with PD for BDC were included. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Study quality, bias, heterogeneity, and certainty were analyzed.Results: Twelve studies from 2004 to 2021 were included, comprising 533 SBDR and 1,313 PD. SBDR was associated with positive proximal duct margins (OR 1.56; CI 1.11-2.18; P = .01), and distal duct margins (OR 43.25; CI 10.38-180.16; P < .01). SBDR yielded fewer lymph nodes (MD -6.93 nodes; CI -9.72-4.15; P < .01) and detected fewer nodal metastases (OR 0.72; CI 0.55-0.94; P = .01). SBDR portended less perioperative morbidity (OR 0.31; CI 0.21-0.46; P < .01), but not mortality (OR 0.52; CI 0.20-1.32; P = .17). SBDR was associated with locoregional recurrences (OR 1.88; CI 1.01-3.53; P = .02), and lymph node recurrences (OR 2.13; CI 1.42-3.2; P = .04). SBDR yielded decreased 5-year OS (OR 0.75; CI 0.65-0.85; P < .01).Conclusions: Despite decreased perioperative morbidity, SBDR appears to provide inferior oncologic control for BDC.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1299
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of risk factors for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Shaohua
    Hu, Sheng
    Gu, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Xiaowen
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (37) : E30365
  • [32] Various approaches of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis:A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ming-Yan He
    Xia-Dong Zhou
    Hao Chen
    Peng Zheng
    Fa-Zhan Zhang
    Wei-Wei Ren
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2018, 17 (03) : 183 - 191
  • [33] Various approaches of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Ming-Yan
    Zhou, Xia-Dong
    Chen, Hao
    Zheng, Peng
    Zhang, Fa-Zhan
    Ren, Wei-Wei
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 17 (03) : 183 - 191
  • [34] Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with and without bile duct thrombus
    Navadgi, Suresh
    Chang, Chi-Chun
    Bartlett, Adam
    McCall, John
    Pandanaboyana, Sanjay
    HPB, 2016, 18 (04) : 312 - 316
  • [35] Prognostic comparison of the longitudinal margin status in distal bile duct cancer: R0 on first bile duct resection versus R0 after additional resection
    Park, Yejong
    Hwang, Dae Wook
    Kim, Jin Hee
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    Jun, Sun-Young
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Song, Ki Byung
    Jun, Eun Sung
    Kim, Song Cheol
    Park, Kwang-Min
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2019, 26 (05) : 169 - 178
  • [36] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
    Jisheng Zhu
    Guoyong Li
    Peng Du
    Xin Zhou
    Weidong Xiao
    Yong Li
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 997 - 1005
  • [37] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
    Zhu, Jisheng
    Li, Guoyong
    Du, Peng
    Zhou, Xin
    Xiao, Weidong
    Li, Yong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (03): : 997 - 1005
  • [38] Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture after Hepaticojejunostomy for Bile Duct Injury - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Halle-Smith, James
    Hall, Lewis
    Mirza, Darius
    Roberts, Keith
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [39] The efficacy of peroral cholangioscopy for difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Korrapati, Praneet
    Ciolino, Jody
    Wani, Sachin
    Shah, Janak
    Watson, Rabindra
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Klapman, Jason
    Komanduri, Srinadh
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (03) : E263 - E275
  • [40] Diagnostic yield of bile duct brushings for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Trikudanathan, Guru
    Navaneethan, Udayakumar
    Njei, Basile
    Vargo, John J.
    Parsi, Mansour A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (05) : 783 - 789