Segmental bile duct resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal third bile duct cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

被引:2
|
作者
Fleming, Andrew M. [1 ,8 ]
Phillips, Alisa L. [2 ]
Hendrick, Leah E. [1 ]
Drake, Justin A. [3 ]
Dickson, Paxton V. [4 ]
Glazer, Evan S. [4 ]
Shibata, David [4 ]
Cleary, Sean P. [5 ]
Yakoub, Danny [6 ]
Deneve, Jeremiah L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Memphis, TN USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Div Gastrointestinal Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Augusta, GA USA
[7] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Div Surg Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[8] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, 910 Madison Ave, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Data regarding oncologic outcomes of segmental bile duct resection (SBDR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for bile duct cancers (BDC) are conflicting. We compared SBDR and PD for BDC utilizing pooled data analysis.Materials and methods: A comprehensive PRISMA 2020 systematic review was performed. Studies comparing SBDR with PD for BDC were included. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Study quality, bias, heterogeneity, and certainty were analyzed.Results: Twelve studies from 2004 to 2021 were included, comprising 533 SBDR and 1,313 PD. SBDR was associated with positive proximal duct margins (OR 1.56; CI 1.11-2.18; P = .01), and distal duct margins (OR 43.25; CI 10.38-180.16; P < .01). SBDR yielded fewer lymph nodes (MD -6.93 nodes; CI -9.72-4.15; P < .01) and detected fewer nodal metastases (OR 0.72; CI 0.55-0.94; P = .01). SBDR portended less perioperative morbidity (OR 0.31; CI 0.21-0.46; P < .01), but not mortality (OR 0.52; CI 0.20-1.32; P = .17). SBDR was associated with locoregional recurrences (OR 1.88; CI 1.01-3.53; P = .02), and lymph node recurrences (OR 2.13; CI 1.42-3.2; P = .04). SBDR yielded decreased 5-year OS (OR 0.75; CI 0.65-0.85; P < .01).Conclusions: Despite decreased perioperative morbidity, SBDR appears to provide inferior oncologic control for BDC.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1299
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be the standard procedure for true middle bile duct cancer? An updated meta-analysis
    Zizzo, Maurizio
    Morini, Andrea
    Zanelli, Magda
    Fabozzi, Massimiliano
    HPB, 2023, 25 (12) : 1595 - 1599
  • [22] Optimal Timing of Surgical Repair After Bile Duct Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Manivasagam, Sri Saran
    Chandra, J. Nemi
    Khera, Dhananjay
    Aradhya, Pramatheshwara S.
    Hiremath, Aashutosh M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [23] Comparison of the efficacy of LTCBDE and LCBDE for common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Bin
    Lu, Yixin
    Li, Erqi
    Bai, Ziyu
    Zhang, Kaiqian
    Li, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 11
  • [24] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Jisheng
    Tu, Shuju
    Yang, Zhengjiang
    Fu, Xiaowei
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Weidong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (04): : 1522 - 1533
  • [25] Risk factors for post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Burns, Rowan
    Connor, Katie
    Sherif, Ahmed
    Wigmore, Stephen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [26] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jisheng Zhu
    Shuju Tu
    Zhengjiang Yang
    Xiaowei Fu
    Yong Li
    Weidong Xiao
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1522 - 1533
  • [27] Endoscopic palliative treatment versus surgical bypass in malignant low bile duct obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alves de Lima, Silvia Lucia
    Castillo Bustamante, Fabio Alberto
    de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    de Almeida Artifon, Everson Luiz
    Chaves, Dalton Marques
    Prince Franzini, Tomazo Antonio
    Furuya Junior, Carlos Kiyoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREATIC DISEASES, 2015, 5 (01): : 35 - 46
  • [28] Comment on "Early Versus Delayed Surgical Repair and Referral for Patients With Bile Duct Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis''
    Rueda-De-Leon, Alexandra
    Dominguez-Rosado, Ismael
    Mercado, Miguel Angel
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (06) : E756 - E756
  • [29] Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Large Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Lei
    Kyaw, Moe Htet
    Tse, Yee Kit
    Lau, James YunWong
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus open exploration of common bile duct for patients with a history of biliary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Piao
    Lin, Hao-min
    Li, Bo
    Su, Song
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (08) : 1577 - 1578