Segmental bile duct resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal third bile duct cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

被引:2
|
作者
Fleming, Andrew M. [1 ,8 ]
Phillips, Alisa L. [2 ]
Hendrick, Leah E. [1 ]
Drake, Justin A. [3 ]
Dickson, Paxton V. [4 ]
Glazer, Evan S. [4 ]
Shibata, David [4 ]
Cleary, Sean P. [5 ]
Yakoub, Danny [6 ]
Deneve, Jeremiah L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Memphis, TN USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Div Gastrointestinal Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Augusta, GA USA
[7] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Div Surg Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[8] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, 910 Madison Ave, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Data regarding oncologic outcomes of segmental bile duct resection (SBDR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for bile duct cancers (BDC) are conflicting. We compared SBDR and PD for BDC utilizing pooled data analysis.Materials and methods: A comprehensive PRISMA 2020 systematic review was performed. Studies comparing SBDR with PD for BDC were included. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Study quality, bias, heterogeneity, and certainty were analyzed.Results: Twelve studies from 2004 to 2021 were included, comprising 533 SBDR and 1,313 PD. SBDR was associated with positive proximal duct margins (OR 1.56; CI 1.11-2.18; P = .01), and distal duct margins (OR 43.25; CI 10.38-180.16; P < .01). SBDR yielded fewer lymph nodes (MD -6.93 nodes; CI -9.72-4.15; P < .01) and detected fewer nodal metastases (OR 0.72; CI 0.55-0.94; P = .01). SBDR portended less perioperative morbidity (OR 0.31; CI 0.21-0.46; P < .01), but not mortality (OR 0.52; CI 0.20-1.32; P = .17). SBDR was associated with locoregional recurrences (OR 1.88; CI 1.01-3.53; P = .02), and lymph node recurrences (OR 2.13; CI 1.42-3.2; P = .04). SBDR yielded decreased 5-year OS (OR 0.75; CI 0.65-0.85; P < .01).Conclusions: Despite decreased perioperative morbidity, SBDR appears to provide inferior oncologic control for BDC.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1299
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
    Kim, Naru
    Lee, Huisong
    Min, Seog Ki
    Lee, Hyeon Kook
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 94 (05) : 240 - 246
  • [2] Prognostic Factors for Radical Resection of Middle and Distal Bile Duct Cancer
    Nomura, Tatsuya
    Tsuchiya, Yoshiaki
    Nashimoto, Atsushi
    Yabusaki, Hiroshi
    Takii, Yasumasa
    Nakagawa, Satoru
    Sato, Nobuaki
    Kanbayash, Chizuko
    Tanaka, Otsuo
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 56 (90) : 294 - 298
  • [3] Laparoscopic Transcystic Versus Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Sarma, Diwakar Ryali
    Balakrishnan, Sankar
    Eltair, Mokhtar
    Mankotia, Rajnish
    Budhoo, Misra
    Kumar, Yogesh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (08) : 1935 - 1948
  • [4] Laparoscopic Transcystic Versus Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shahin Hajibandeh
    Shahab Hajibandeh
    Diwakar Ryali Sarma
    Sankar Balakrishnan
    Mokhtar Eltair
    Rajnish Mankotia
    Misra Budhoo
    Yogesh Kumar
    World Journal of Surgery, 2019, 43 : 1935 - 1948
  • [5] Adjuvant chemotherapy in resected bile duct cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Messina, Carlo
    Merz, Valeria
    Frisinghelli, Michela
    Trentin, Chiara
    Grego, Elisabetta
    Veccia, Antonello
    Salati, Massimiliano
    Messina, Marco
    Carnaghi, Carlo
    Caffo, Orazio
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2019, 143 : 124 - 129
  • [6] Laparoscopic surgery versus Endoscopy in the management Common Bile Duct Stones: systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Elhag, Hafs
    Eltayeb, Omar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [7] Clinical Impact of Common Bile Duct Angulation on the Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stone: A Meta-analysis and Review
    Ryu, Seongyul
    Jo, Ik Hyun
    Kim, Seonhoo
    Kim, Yeon-Ji
    Chung, Woo Chul
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 76 (04): : 199 - 205
  • [8] Routine extra-hepatic bile duct resection in gallbladder cancer patients without bile duct infiltration: A systematic review
    Nigri, Giuseppe
    Berardi, Giammauro
    Mattana, Chiara
    Mangogna, Livia
    Petrucciani, Niccolo
    Sagnotta, Andrea
    Aurello, Paolo
    D'Angelo, Francesco
    Ramacciato, Giovanni
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2016, 14 (06): : 337 - 344
  • [9] Prognostic factors for intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct following surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zeng, Di
    Li, Bei
    Cheng, Nansheng
    SURGERY TODAY, 2025, 55 (02) : 131 - 143
  • [10] Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Holmium laser Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Bin
    Fu, Liangyin
    Lu, Tingting
    Zhang, Guangming
    Dong, Xiaohua
    Zhao, Qiqi
    Yu, Miao
    Ma, Haizhong
    Yang, Kehu
    Cai, Hui
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (07) : 1809 - 1820