EFFECT OF TRIGGER-TO-OOCYTE COLLECTION INTERVAL ON COLLECTED OOCYTE COUNT IN PROGESTIN-PRIMED OVARIAN STIMULATION (PPOS) AND GNRH ANTAGONIST CYCLES

被引：0
|
作者：
Cakar, Aysu [1 ]
Yildiz, Sule [1 ]
Turkgeldi, Engin [1 ]
Keles, Ipek [2 ]
Bozdag, Gurkan [1 ]
Kalafat, Erkan [1 ]
Ata, Baris [3 ]
机构：
[1] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Koc Univ, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] ART Fertil Clin, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
来源：
FERTILITY AND STERILITY | 2023年 / 120卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
P-14
引用
收藏
页码：E112 / E112
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Granulosa cells apoptosis and follicular fluid hormones: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocols
    Li, Xiaolan
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Cai, Jiawei
    Pang, Jiahui
    Sun, Peng
    Chen, Jianhui
    Wang, Meng
    Liang, Xiaoyan
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (07) : 609 - 613
  • [22] A NOVEL FLEXIBLE PROGESTIN PRIMED OVARIAN STIMULATION PROTOCOL: COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY OUTCOMES WITH THE FLEXIBLE GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN AN OOCYTE DONATION PROGRAM.
    Yildiz, Sule
    Turkgeldi, Engin
    Eraslan, Alper
    Angun, Berk
    Ata, Mustafa Baris
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (03) : E194 - E195
  • [23] Comparison of IVF outcomes in women undergoing IVF stimulation using progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) Vs GnRH antagonist (GnRH-Antag) protocol
    Salkar, J.
    Hegde, V.
    Agarwal, A.
    Vytla, D.
    Mogili, I.
    Bommakanti, L.
    Sindu, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [24] Outcomes and cost-effectiveness comparisons of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation, GnRH antagonist protocol, and luteal phase stimulation for fertility preservation
    Zhao, Weie
    Sun, Peng
    Li, Tingting
    Li, Yongfang
    Liang, Xiaoyan
    Li, Jingjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 163 (02) : 645 - 650
  • [25] Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation is a non-inferior alternative to the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation: a propensity score weighting analysis
    Duc, T. Le
    Long, H. B.
    Do, T. T. T.
    Phan, N. Q.
    Giap, T. M. P.
    Nguyen, T. L. H.
    Le, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [26] Comparison of reproductive outcomes after progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dydrogesterone versus cetrorelix to inhibit spontaneous ovulation in oocyte donation
    Moreno, J. A.
    Masoli, P.
    Sferrazza, C.
    Leiva, H.
    Espinosa, O.
    Hernande Rudnick, P.
    Lizardo, J.
    Rivera, F.
    Plaz de los Reyes, S.
    Cordova, M.
    Sferrazza, E.
    Chavez, N.
    Sepulveda, M.
    Jiliberto, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 458 - 459
  • [27] Non-inferiority of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol: A propensity score-weighted analysis
    Thang, Le Duc
    Long, Hoang Bao
    Trang, Do Thi Thu
    Quy, Phan Ngoc
    Phuong, Giap Thi Mai
    Hanh, Bui Thi
    Thach, Than Trong
    Huong, Nguyen Thi Lien
    Hoang, Le
    Hugues, Jean-Noel
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 123 (04) : 523 - 529
  • [28] Comparison of the Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Patients With Low Prognosis
    Du, Mingze
    Zhang, Junwei
    Li, Zhen
    Liu, Xinmi
    Li, Jing
    Liu, Wenxia
    Guan, Yichun
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [29] New trial of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone versus a typical GnRH antagonist regimen in assisted reproductive technology
    Iwami, Nanako
    Kawamata, Miho
    Ozawa, Naoko
    Yamamoto, Takahiro
    Watanabe, Eri
    Moriwaka, Osamu
    Kamiya, Hirobumi
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (03) : 663 - 671
  • [30] New trial of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone versus a typical GnRH antagonist regimen in assisted reproductive technology
    Nanako Iwami
    Miho Kawamata
    Naoko Ozawa
    Takahiro Yamamoto
    Eri Watanabe
    Osamu Moriwaka
    Hirobumi Kamiya
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 663 - 671
12345