Granulosa cells apoptosis and follicular fluid hormones: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocols

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Xiaolan [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoli [1 ]
Cai, Jiawei [2 ]
Pang, Jiahui [1 ]
Sun, Peng [1 ]
Chen, Jianhui [1 ]
Wang, Meng [1 ]
Liang, Xiaoyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Reprod Med Res Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Gastrointestinal Surg Dept, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; granulosa cells apoptosis; follicular fluid hormones; OOCYTE QUALITY; WOMEN; HYPERSTIMULATION; FERTILIZATION; LH;
D O I
10.1080/09513590.2020.1822802
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To explore the effect of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol (PPOS) on mural granulosa cells (GCs) apoptosis and hormonal profiles in follicular fluid (FF) and efficacy over GnRH antagonist (GnRH-A) protocols. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study from June through August 2017 at a tertiary teaching hospital. 63 Patients meeting our criteria were recruited in this prospective study voluntarily and stratified to PPOS or GnRH-A group randomly. Mural GCs and FF were collected during oocyte retrieval. Apoptosis of GCs was assessed using the Annexin V-affinity assay by flow cytometry and hormonal profiles in FF were measured using electrochemiluminescence. Results A total of 63 women were assessed for eligibility, with 25 cases in PPOS group and 38 in GnRH-A group. Difference of early stage apoptosis rate, late stage apoptosis rate, and total apoptosis rate did not reach statistical significance between groups. Meanwhile, concentrations of hormones in FF were comparable in two groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocyte rate, fertilization rate, and top-quality embryos rate. No patients experienced premature LH surge in both groups during the study. Conclusion Compared to GnRH antagonist protocol, PPOS had comparable laboratory outcomes, GCs apoptosis rate and hormonal profiles in FF. PPOS is an effective and safe alternative option to provide controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 613
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of aneuploidy for patients of different ages treated with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation or GnRH antagonist protocols
    Wan, Lili
    Chen, Furui
    Xiong, Dongsheng
    Chen, Shiqi
    Chen, Jiexiu
    Qin, Juan
    Li-Ling, Jesse
    Zhong, Taiqing
    Wang, Xueyan
    Gong, Yan
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (05)
  • [2] Outcomes of fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus antagonist protocols
    Emmanuelle Mathieu d’Argent
    Clément Ferrier
    Chrysoula Zacharopoulou
    Naouel Ahdad-Yata
    Anne-Sophie Boudy
    Adèle Cantalloube
    Rachel Levy
    Jean-Marie Antoine
    Emile Daraï
    Sofiane Bendifallah
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 13
  • [3] Outcomes of fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus antagonist protocols
    d'Argent, Emmanuelle Mathieu
    Ferrier, Clement
    Zacharopoulou, Chrysoula
    Ahdad-Yata, Naouel
    Boudy, Anne-Sophie
    Cantalloube, Adele
    Levy, Rachel
    Antoine, Jean-Marie
    Darai, Emile
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of the Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Patients With Low Prognosis
    Du, Mingze
    Zhang, Junwei
    Li, Zhen
    Liu, Xinmi
    Li, Jing
    Liu, Wenxia
    Guan, Yichun
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [5] COMPARISON OF PROGESTIN-PRIMED OVARIAN STIMULATION AND GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN CLINICAL OUTCOME FOR PCOS PATIENTS.
    Li, Yujie
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E456 - E456
  • [6] Comparison of the neonatal outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and flexible GnRH antagonist protocols: a propensity score-matched cohort study
    Du, Mingze
    Zhang, Junwei
    Ren, Bingnan
    Guan, Yichun
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [7] Outcomes of a GnRH Agonist Trigger Following a GnRH Antagonist or Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Cycle
    Kalafat, Erkan
    Turkgeldi, Engin
    Yildiz, Sule
    Dizdar, Merve
    Keles, Ipek
    Ata, Baris
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Non-inferiority of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol: A propensity score-weighted analysis
    Thang, Le Duc
    Long, Hoang Bao
    Trang, Do Thi Thu
    Quy, Phan Ngoc
    Phuong, Giap Thi Mai
    Hanh, Bui Thi
    Thach, Than Trong
    Huong, Nguyen Thi Lien
    Hoang, Le
    Hugues, Jean-Noel
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 123 (04) : 523 - 529
  • [9] New trial of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone versus a typical GnRH antagonist regimen in assisted reproductive technology
    Iwami, Nanako
    Kawamata, Miho
    Ozawa, Naoko
    Yamamoto, Takahiro
    Watanabe, Eri
    Moriwaka, Osamu
    Kamiya, Hirobumi
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (03) : 663 - 671
  • [10] Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response
    Zhuo-ni Xiao
    Jia-li Peng
    Jing Yang
    Wang-ming Xu
    Current Medical Science, 2019, 39 : 431 - 436