Administrative monopoly regulation and corporate tax avoidance- evidence from China

被引:8
|
作者
Zhang, Zili [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zeyu [3 ]
Si, Yanwu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Tianyang [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Key Res Ctr Philosophy & Social Sci Zhejiang Prov, Inst Local Finance Res, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Fair competition review system; Administrative monopoly regulation; Corporate tax avoidance; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2023.104402
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of administrative monopoly regulation on corporate tax avoidance. Using the difference-in-difference (DID) methodology and data from A-share listed companies for the period 2012-2020, we find that China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) significantly reduces tax avoidance by administrative monopolies. Possible channels include increasing analyst attention, improving quality of corporate disclosure, and increasing management ownership. The enhanced external monitoring and increased internal incentives resulting from the implementation of the FCRS reduce the tax avoidance impulse of administrative monopolies. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the dampening effect of the FCRS on tax avoidance is more pronounced among firms with strong short-term solvency, weak financing constraints, and defect-free internal controls.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corporate governance and tax avoidance: evidence from an emerging market
    Hasan, Arshad
    Anwar, Waqas
    Zahir-Ul-Hassan, Muhammad Kaleem
    Ahmed, Ammad
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (22) : 2688 - 2704
  • [42] Tax structure and corporate tax compliance: evidence from China
    Yu, Jingyuan
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
  • [43] Tax avoidance and firm value: evidence from China
    Chen, Xudong
    Hu, Na
    Wang, Xue
    Tang, Xiaofei
    NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 5 (01) : 25 - 42
  • [44] Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China
    Cao, Yuqiang
    Feng, Zhuoan
    Lu, Meiting
    Shan, Yaowen
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2021, 61 (03): : 4967 - 5000
  • [45] Regional favoritism and tax avoidance: evidence from China
    Chen, Yunsen
    Huang, Jianqiao
    Liu, Hang
    Wang, Weimin
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2019, 58 (05): : 1413 - 1443
  • [47] Corporate Tax Avoidance and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the Enforcement of Tax Amnesty in Indonesia
    Ngelo, Agnes Aurora
    Permatasari, Yani
    Harymawan, Iman
    Anridho, Nadia
    Kamarudin, Khairul Anuar
    ECONOMIES, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [48] Internal Control Quality and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Empirical Evidence from China's Listed Companies
    Zeng Yanxia
    Li Ynanhui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT, BKS ONE & TWO, 2016, : 1169 - 1174
  • [49] Takeover Threats and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Market-Oriented Control Reform in China
    Wang, Shihao
    Wang, Tao
    Wu, Chunxian
    Zhang, Jing
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2025, 61 (03) : 641 - 668
  • [50] Is Corporate Social Responsibility Related to Corporate Tax Avoidance? Evidence from a Natural Experiment
    Mayberry, Michael A.
    Watson, Luke
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN TAXATION ASSOCIATION, 2021, 43 (01): : 79 - 106