Administrative monopoly regulation and corporate tax avoidance- evidence from China

被引:8
|
作者
Zhang, Zili [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zeyu [3 ]
Si, Yanwu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Tianyang [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Key Res Ctr Philosophy & Social Sci Zhejiang Prov, Inst Local Finance Res, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Fair competition review system; Administrative monopoly regulation; Corporate tax avoidance; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2023.104402
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of administrative monopoly regulation on corporate tax avoidance. Using the difference-in-difference (DID) methodology and data from A-share listed companies for the period 2012-2020, we find that China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) significantly reduces tax avoidance by administrative monopolies. Possible channels include increasing analyst attention, improving quality of corporate disclosure, and increasing management ownership. The enhanced external monitoring and increased internal incentives resulting from the implementation of the FCRS reduce the tax avoidance impulse of administrative monopolies. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the dampening effect of the FCRS on tax avoidance is more pronounced among firms with strong short-term solvency, weak financing constraints, and defect-free internal controls.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Corporate governance effects of digital finance: Evidence from corporate tax avoidance in China
    Guo, Xingfang
    Wei, Tao
    Wang, Aiping
    Hu, Haifeng
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2024, 72
  • [22] Industry and geographic peer effects on corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China
    Liang, Quanxi
    Li, Qiumei
    Lu, Meiting
    Shan, Yaowen
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 67
  • [23] Does ESG performance affect corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from China
    Jiang, Hongli
    Hu, Wenjie
    Jiang, Pengcheng
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 61
  • [24] Country-by-country reporting and corporate tax avoidance: evidence from China
    Yang, Laimi
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, : 3087 - 3104
  • [25] Natural Disaster, Tax Avoidance, and Corporate Pollution Emissions: Evidence from China
    Xu, Rui
    Ren, Liuyang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2025, 197 (01) : 195 - 217
  • [26] Short-Selling Threats and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence From Regulation SHO
    Maharjan, Johan
    Omer, Thomas
    Zhao, Yijiang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2025,
  • [27] Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Vietnamese Firms
    Oanh, Ha Kieu
    Gan, Christopher
    REVIEW OF PACIFIC BASIN FINANCIAL MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2022, 25 (01)
  • [28] Auditor tax expertise and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Taiwan
    Liu, Wu-Po
    Ma, Mengyu
    Liu, Zhenfeng
    So, Chun Yin
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023, 34 (03): : 96 - 108
  • [29] Tax Avoidance, Tax Risk, and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Korea
    Choi, Jihwan
    Park, Hyungju
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [30] Multiple Large Shareholders, Investment Efficiency and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from China
    Yu, Xiaohong
    Chen, Maonan
    Ye, Yujun
    PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2024, 33 (01): : 103 - 136