Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Zhu, Junming [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Yuting [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Qingshui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Xueyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Zhiyang [4 ,7 ]
Chen, Shaohao [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Binhai Campus, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Fujian Key Lab Precis Med Canc, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Hosp Quanzhou 1, Dept Urol Surg, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350005, Peoples R China
[6] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350212, Binhai Campus, Peoples R China
[7] Fujian Med Univ, Quanzhou First Hosp, Dept Urol, Quanzhou 362 000, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnostic accuracy; Digital rectal examination; MRI; Prostate cancer; T staging; POPULATION; DENSITY; DISEASE; CARE; MRI;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_176_23
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is the basis for the risk stratification to select targeted treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy rates of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital rectal examination (DRE) for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable PCa. Methods: From March 2021 to March 2022, patients with PCa with T staging by prostate biopsy were included. All examinations used postoperative histopathologic T staging as the reference standard. All patients underwent DRE and MRI before the puncture. Two blinded urologists and radiologists independently evaluated DRE and MRI, respectively. Before the examination, patients were then divided into early- (T1, T2) and late-(T3, T4) stage cancer. Analysis of a paired sample sign test was performed to determine differences between DRE and MRI. Results: A total of 136 study participants with PCa were evaluated histopathologically, of whom 71% (97/136) and 29% (39/136) were at the early- and late-stage cancer, respectively. MRI had a significantly higher accuracy (91.9% vs. 76.5%, P < 0.001) compared with DRE. Further, MRI showed a higher sensitivity than DRE to diagnose early PCa (92.8% vs. 74.2%; P < 0.001). However, the specificity was not significantly different between them (89.7% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.375). Area under the curve (receiver operating curve) values were calculated as 0.78 +/- 0.038 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.86), 0.91 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and 0.872 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92) for DRE-, MRI-, MRI + DRE-based PCa predictions, respectively. The prediction performance of MRI was better than that of DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.632, P = 0.0003) and MRI + DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.715, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For resectable PCa, the diagnostic potential of MRI in assessing the T stage was higher than that of DRE. However, DRE is still valuable, especially for patients with locally advanced PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1030
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging in staging of prostate cancer specifically in patients diagnosed with clinically locally advanced tumours by digital rectal examination
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Yates, David R.
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Seringe, Elise
    Bousquet, Jean-Claude
    Comperat, Eva
    Bitker, Marc-Olivier
    Grenier, Philippe
    Roupret, Morgan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (04) : 881 - 886
  • [42] Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lin, Yue
    Johnson, Latrice A.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01) : 93 - 108
  • [43] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer
    Chandra, Ronil V.
    Heinze, Stefan
    Dowling, Richard
    Shadbolt, Clair
    Costello, Anthony
    Pedersen, John
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (10) : 860 - 865
  • [44] Is magnetic resonance imaging necessary in the staging of prostate cancer?
    Tüzel, E
    Sevinç, M
    Obuz, F
    Sade, M
    Kirkali, Z
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1998, 61 (04) : 227 - 231
  • [45] Magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal cancer: Is gadolineum helpful?
    Vliegen, RF
    Beets, GL
    Kessels, AG
    Von Meyenfeldt, MF
    Van Engelshoven, JM
    Beets-Tan, RG
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 244 - 244
  • [46] Dichotomous Estimation of Prostate Volume: A Diagnostic Study of the Accuracy of the Digital Rectal Examination
    Su, Michael Z.
    Lenaghan, Daniel
    Woo, Henry H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2013, 31 (03): : 220 - 225
  • [47] Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: staging and restaging evaluation
    Moreno, Courtney C.
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    Kalb, Bobby T.
    Tipton, Russell G.
    Hanley, Krisztina Z.
    Kitajima, Hiroumi D.
    Dixon, W. Thomas
    Votaw, John R.
    Oshinski, John N.
    Mittal, Pardeep K.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (07): : 2613 - 2629
  • [48] Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer staging
    Bartram, C
    Brown, G
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 31 (03) : 827 - +
  • [49] Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: staging and restaging evaluation
    Courtney C. Moreno
    Patrick S. Sullivan
    Bobby T. Kalb
    Russell G. Tipton
    Krisztina Z. Hanley
    Hiroumi D. Kitajima
    W. Thomas Dixon
    John R. Votaw
    John N. Oshinski
    Pardeep K. Mittal
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 2613 - 2629
  • [50] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for tumour staging of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gandhi, Niket
    Krishna, Satheesh
    Booth, Christopher M.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Flood, Trevor A.
    Morgan, Scott C.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    McGrath, Trevor A.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (05) : 744 - 753