Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Zhu, Junming [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Yuting [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Qingshui [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Xueyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Zhiyang [4 ,7 ]
Chen, Shaohao [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Binhai Campus, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Fujian Key Lab Precis Med Canc, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Hosp Quanzhou 1, Dept Urol Surg, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Urol Res Inst, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350005, Peoples R China
[6] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Fuzhou 350212, Binhai Campus, Peoples R China
[7] Fujian Med Univ, Quanzhou First Hosp, Dept Urol, Quanzhou 362 000, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnostic accuracy; Digital rectal examination; MRI; Prostate cancer; T staging; POPULATION; DENSITY; DISEASE; CARE; MRI;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_176_23
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is the basis for the risk stratification to select targeted treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy rates of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital rectal examination (DRE) for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable PCa. Methods: From March 2021 to March 2022, patients with PCa with T staging by prostate biopsy were included. All examinations used postoperative histopathologic T staging as the reference standard. All patients underwent DRE and MRI before the puncture. Two blinded urologists and radiologists independently evaluated DRE and MRI, respectively. Before the examination, patients were then divided into early- (T1, T2) and late-(T3, T4) stage cancer. Analysis of a paired sample sign test was performed to determine differences between DRE and MRI. Results: A total of 136 study participants with PCa were evaluated histopathologically, of whom 71% (97/136) and 29% (39/136) were at the early- and late-stage cancer, respectively. MRI had a significantly higher accuracy (91.9% vs. 76.5%, P < 0.001) compared with DRE. Further, MRI showed a higher sensitivity than DRE to diagnose early PCa (92.8% vs. 74.2%; P < 0.001). However, the specificity was not significantly different between them (89.7% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.375). Area under the curve (receiver operating curve) values were calculated as 0.78 +/- 0.038 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.86), 0.91 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and 0.872 +/- 0.028 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92) for DRE-, MRI-, MRI + DRE-based PCa predictions, respectively. The prediction performance of MRI was better than that of DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.632, P = 0.0003) and MRI + DRE (DeLong test, z = 3.715, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For resectable PCa, the diagnostic potential of MRI in assessing the T stage was higher than that of DRE. However, DRE is still valuable, especially for patients with locally advanced PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1030
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Chan Kyo Kim
    Seung Hoon Kim
    Ho Kyung Chun
    Woo-Yong Lee
    Seong-Hyeon Yun
    Sang-Yong Song
    Dongil Choi
    Hyo Keun Lim
    Min Ju Kim
    Jongmee Lee
    Soon Jin Lee
    European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 972 - 980
  • [22] ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT CRITERIA FOR LYMPH NODE STAGING IN RECTAL CANCER BY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Loch, Florian
    Taupitz, Matthias
    Schmidt, Christoph
    Groene, Joern
    Kreis, Martin E.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) : S1232 - S1232
  • [23] Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Kim, CK
    Kim, SH
    Chun, HK
    Lee, WY
    Yun, SH
    Song, SY
    Choi, D
    Lim, HK
    Kim, MJ
    Lee, J
    Lee, SJ
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (05) : 972 - 980
  • [24] Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Jörn Gröne
    Florian N. Loch
    Matthias Taupitz
    C. Schmidt
    Martin E. Kreis
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2018, 22 : 146 - 153
  • [25] Accuracy of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer
    Takayuki Akasu
    Gen Iinuma
    Masashi Takawa
    Seiichiro Yamamoto
    Yukio Muramatsu
    Noriyuki Moriyama
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16 : 2787 - 2794
  • [26] Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer
    Akasu, T.
    Iinuma, G.
    Yamamoto, S.
    Yamaguchi, T.
    Takawa, M.
    Muramatsu, Y.
    Moriyama, N.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 : 86 - 86
  • [27] Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Groene, Joern
    Loch, Florian N.
    Taupitz, Matthias
    Schmidt, C.
    Kreis, Martin E.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (01) : 146 - 153
  • [28] Accuracy of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer
    Akasu, Takayuki
    Iinuma, Gen
    Takawa, Masashi
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    Muramatsu, Yukio
    Moriyama, Noriyuki
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (10) : 2787 - 2794
  • [29] Diagnostic tests in urology: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the staging of prostate cancer
    Preston, Mark A.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Mucci, Lorelei
    Witiuk, Kelsey
    Breau, Rodney H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (03) : 514 - 517
  • [30] Rectal cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging
    Crespo Villalba, Francisco Jose
    IMAGEN DIAGNOSTICA, 2012, 3 (02): : 56 - 62