Soybean yield response to different mechanical weed control methods in organic agriculture in Luxembourg

被引:5
|
作者
Richard, David [1 ,2 ]
Leimbrock-Rosch, Laura [2 ]
Kessler, Sabine [2 ]
Stoll, Evelyne [2 ]
Zimmer, Stephanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Osnabruck Univ Appl Sci, Fac Agr Sci & Landscape Architecture, Krumpel 31, D-49090 Osnabruck, Germany
[2] Inst Organ Agr Luxembourg Asbl IBLA, 27 Schanz, L-6225 Altrier, Luxembourg
关键词
Mechanical weed control; Organic soybean; Cultivation trial; Luxembourg; CAMELINA; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2023.126842
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is very sensitive to interferences with weeds during vegetative growth. Weed control is a key factor for the successful production of soybean in organic agriculture. In Luxemburg, where soybean is not yet an established crop, cultivation trials were implemented to test and evaluate different methods of mechanical weed control in soybean cultivation. Trials were conducted in 2018 and 2019 at three locations in Luxembourg. A flex-tine harrow that can harrow the whole ground surface and a hoe used as inter-row cultivator were the basis of the mechanical treatments. Complementary technologies for the hoe such as the finger weeder, and an alternative method involving intercropping of soybean with camelina were also integrated in the trials. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of the tested methods regarding weed regulation and their effects on soybean growth and development and grain yield. In comparison to the weed-free control, both hoeing and harrowing led to yields losses; these losses were lower with hoeing (-2 %) than with harrowing (-34 %). Yields were similar between hoeing and hand weeding and were also similar between harrowing and the weed-free control. The weed control index based on the difference in weed cover compared with the non-weeded treatment was above 0.6 for hoeing, about 0.2 for harrowing and lower than 0.01 for intercropping. Intercropping with camelina was not suitable for Luxembourg, especially during the dry study years of 2018 and 2019 due too poor establishment. Intra-row weeding with finger weeder in addition to inter-row hoeing did not significantly enhance the single use of the hoe in the inter-row. The non-selectivity of harrowing generated more soybean plant losses (-28 %) and lower plant height (-8 %) than hoeing (-11 % and + 5 %, respectively) when compared with the weed-free control. Other yield components such as the number of pods per plant, number of beans per pod, thousand kernel mass, and the first pod height were not significantly affected by the weeding method. The efficiency of any treatment was low when weed infestation was already high after soybean emergence, although where weed infestation was low, any of the treatments were applicable. Encouraging rigorous weed management throughout the crop rotation is a key factor to maximize soybean yield.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COTTON (GOSSYPIUM-HIRSUTUM) YIELD RESPONSE TO MECHANICAL AND CHEMICAL WEED-CONTROL SYSTEMS
    SNIPES, CE
    MUELLER, TC
    WEED SCIENCE, 1992, 40 (02) : 249 - 254
  • [42] Different timing of whitefly control and soybean yield
    Vieira, Simone Silva
    Oliveira de Freitas Bueno, Regiane Cristina
    Bueno, Adeney de Freitas
    Carissimi Boff, Mari Ines
    Gobbi, Alysson Luis
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2013, 43 (02): : 247 - 253
  • [43] Increased seeding rate and multiple methods of mechanical weed control reduce weed biomass in a poorly competitive organic crop
    Alba, Oleksandr S.
    Syrovy, Lena D.
    Duddu, Hema S. N.
    Shirtliffe, Steven J.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2020, 245
  • [44] A multi-stimuli-response metal-organic framework nanopesticide for smart weed control in agriculture
    Zhang, Dingyang
    Guo, Xueping
    Rao, Wenhua
    Pan, Danmei
    Cao, Fang
    Zhai, Tianyun
    Zheng, Wenhui
    Abubakar, Yakubu Saddeeq
    Guan, Xiong
    Chen, Zhi
    Pan, Xiaohong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO, 2025, 12 (01) : 608 - 622
  • [45] Thermal and Mechanical Weed Control in Organic Highbush Blueberry
    Moretti, Marcelo L.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2020, 55 (09) : S205 - S205
  • [46] ASSESSMENT OF SOME WEED CONTROL METHODS EFFICACY AND YIELD LOSSES CAUSED BY WEED IN EGGPLANT
    Almhemed, Kamal
    Ustuner, Tamer
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2022, 31 (08): : 7514 - 7520
  • [47] Perspectives and Advances in Organic Formulations for Agriculture: Encapsulation of Herbicides for Weed Control
    Rodriguez-Mejias, Francisco J.
    Scavo, Aurelio
    Chinchilla, Nuria
    Molinillo, Jose M. G.
    Schwaiger, Stefan
    Mauromicale, Giovanni
    Macias, Francisco A.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [48] The effect of living mulches and conventional methods of weed control on weed infestation and potato yield
    Kolodziejczyk, M.
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2015, 191 : 127 - 133
  • [49] Effect of crop establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed management, and rice yield
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    Awan, Tahir Hussain
    Abugho, Seth Bernard
    Evengelista, Gio
    Sudhir-Yadav
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2015, 172 : 72 - 84
  • [50] STUDIES ON WEED-CONTROL IN ARHAR AND SOYBEAN AS INFLUENCED BY PLANTING PATTERNS, INTERCROPPING AND WEED-CONTROL METHODS
    PRASAD, K
    GAUTAM, RC
    MOHTA, NK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1985, 30 (04) : 434 - 439