Soybean yield response to different mechanical weed control methods in organic agriculture in Luxembourg

被引:5
|
作者
Richard, David [1 ,2 ]
Leimbrock-Rosch, Laura [2 ]
Kessler, Sabine [2 ]
Stoll, Evelyne [2 ]
Zimmer, Stephanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Osnabruck Univ Appl Sci, Fac Agr Sci & Landscape Architecture, Krumpel 31, D-49090 Osnabruck, Germany
[2] Inst Organ Agr Luxembourg Asbl IBLA, 27 Schanz, L-6225 Altrier, Luxembourg
关键词
Mechanical weed control; Organic soybean; Cultivation trial; Luxembourg; CAMELINA; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2023.126842
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is very sensitive to interferences with weeds during vegetative growth. Weed control is a key factor for the successful production of soybean in organic agriculture. In Luxemburg, where soybean is not yet an established crop, cultivation trials were implemented to test and evaluate different methods of mechanical weed control in soybean cultivation. Trials were conducted in 2018 and 2019 at three locations in Luxembourg. A flex-tine harrow that can harrow the whole ground surface and a hoe used as inter-row cultivator were the basis of the mechanical treatments. Complementary technologies for the hoe such as the finger weeder, and an alternative method involving intercropping of soybean with camelina were also integrated in the trials. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of the tested methods regarding weed regulation and their effects on soybean growth and development and grain yield. In comparison to the weed-free control, both hoeing and harrowing led to yields losses; these losses were lower with hoeing (-2 %) than with harrowing (-34 %). Yields were similar between hoeing and hand weeding and were also similar between harrowing and the weed-free control. The weed control index based on the difference in weed cover compared with the non-weeded treatment was above 0.6 for hoeing, about 0.2 for harrowing and lower than 0.01 for intercropping. Intercropping with camelina was not suitable for Luxembourg, especially during the dry study years of 2018 and 2019 due too poor establishment. Intra-row weeding with finger weeder in addition to inter-row hoeing did not significantly enhance the single use of the hoe in the inter-row. The non-selectivity of harrowing generated more soybean plant losses (-28 %) and lower plant height (-8 %) than hoeing (-11 % and + 5 %, respectively) when compared with the weed-free control. Other yield components such as the number of pods per plant, number of beans per pod, thousand kernel mass, and the first pod height were not significantly affected by the weeding method. The efficiency of any treatment was low when weed infestation was already high after soybean emergence, although where weed infestation was low, any of the treatments were applicable. Encouraging rigorous weed management throughout the crop rotation is a key factor to maximize soybean yield.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Weed control and yield response to foramsulfuron in corn
    Nurse, Robert E.
    Hamill, Allan S.
    Swanton, Clarence J.
    Tardif, Francois J.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 453 - 458
  • [22] Evaluation of Organic Weed Management Practices on Growth, Yield and Weed Control Efficiency in Soybean-chickpea Sequence under Irrigated Condition
    Chavan, A. A.
    Narkhede, W. N.
    Garud, H. S.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2021, 44 (08) : 921 - 928
  • [23] Mechanical weed control in organic winter wheat
    Pannacci, Euro
    Tei, Francesco
    Guiducci, Marcello
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2017, 12 (04) : 336 - 342
  • [24] The effects of weed density and different weed control applications on yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars
    Yilar, Melih
    Sozen, Omer
    Karadavut, Ufuk
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2020, 43 (01) : 117 - 121
  • [25] COMPATIBILITY OF CHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL WEED CONTROL METHODS
    UPCHURCH, RP
    SELMAN, FL
    WEED SCIENCE, 1968, 16 (02) : 121 - +
  • [26] INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN ON YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT METHODS OF WEED-CONTROL AND CROPPING SYSTEMS
    PRUSTY, JC
    PAL, M
    DAYANAND
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1987, 32 (04) : 370 - 373
  • [27] Mechanical Weed Control Systems: Methods and Effectiveness
    Zawada, Michal
    Legutko, Stanislaw
    Goscianska-Lowinska, Julia
    Szymczyk, Sebastian
    Nijak, Mateusz
    Wojciechowski, Jacek
    Zwierzynski, Mikolaj
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (21)
  • [28] Weed control in organic agriculture by the two layer-plough
    Lazauskas, P
    Pilipavicius, V
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2004, : 573 - 580
  • [29] Effects of weed control strategy on weed dynamics, soybean productivity and profitability under conservation agriculture in India
    Sepat, Seema
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Sharma, Ajit Ram
    Pavuluri, Kiran
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Iquebal, Mir Asif
    Verma, Ajay
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2017, 210 : 61 - 70
  • [30] Yield, quality and weed control in soybean crop as affected by several cultural and weed management practices
    Kanatas, Panagiotis
    Travlos, Ilias
    Papastylianou, Panayiota
    Gazoulis, Ioannis
    Kakabouki, Ioanna
    Tsekoura, Anastasia
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2020, 48 (01) : 329 - 341