Soybean yield response to different mechanical weed control methods in organic agriculture in Luxembourg

被引:5
|
作者
Richard, David [1 ,2 ]
Leimbrock-Rosch, Laura [2 ]
Kessler, Sabine [2 ]
Stoll, Evelyne [2 ]
Zimmer, Stephanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Osnabruck Univ Appl Sci, Fac Agr Sci & Landscape Architecture, Krumpel 31, D-49090 Osnabruck, Germany
[2] Inst Organ Agr Luxembourg Asbl IBLA, 27 Schanz, L-6225 Altrier, Luxembourg
关键词
Mechanical weed control; Organic soybean; Cultivation trial; Luxembourg; CAMELINA; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2023.126842
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is very sensitive to interferences with weeds during vegetative growth. Weed control is a key factor for the successful production of soybean in organic agriculture. In Luxemburg, where soybean is not yet an established crop, cultivation trials were implemented to test and evaluate different methods of mechanical weed control in soybean cultivation. Trials were conducted in 2018 and 2019 at three locations in Luxembourg. A flex-tine harrow that can harrow the whole ground surface and a hoe used as inter-row cultivator were the basis of the mechanical treatments. Complementary technologies for the hoe such as the finger weeder, and an alternative method involving intercropping of soybean with camelina were also integrated in the trials. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of the tested methods regarding weed regulation and their effects on soybean growth and development and grain yield. In comparison to the weed-free control, both hoeing and harrowing led to yields losses; these losses were lower with hoeing (-2 %) than with harrowing (-34 %). Yields were similar between hoeing and hand weeding and were also similar between harrowing and the weed-free control. The weed control index based on the difference in weed cover compared with the non-weeded treatment was above 0.6 for hoeing, about 0.2 for harrowing and lower than 0.01 for intercropping. Intercropping with camelina was not suitable for Luxembourg, especially during the dry study years of 2018 and 2019 due too poor establishment. Intra-row weeding with finger weeder in addition to inter-row hoeing did not significantly enhance the single use of the hoe in the inter-row. The non-selectivity of harrowing generated more soybean plant losses (-28 %) and lower plant height (-8 %) than hoeing (-11 % and + 5 %, respectively) when compared with the weed-free control. Other yield components such as the number of pods per plant, number of beans per pod, thousand kernel mass, and the first pod height were not significantly affected by the weeding method. The efficiency of any treatment was low when weed infestation was already high after soybean emergence, although where weed infestation was low, any of the treatments were applicable. Encouraging rigorous weed management throughout the crop rotation is a key factor to maximize soybean yield.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of different mechanical weed control methods on weed communities in organic soybean cultivation in Luxembourg
    Richard D.
    Leimbrock-Rosch L.
    Keßler S.
    Zimmer S.
    Stoll E.
    Organic Agriculture, 2020, 10 (Suppl 1) : 79 - 92
  • [2] INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT WEED CONTROL METHODS ON SOYBEAN YIELD
    Lakic, Josip
    Kovacev, Igor
    Filipovic, Dubravko
    Baric, Klara
    Pintar, Ana
    Grubor, Mateja
    ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING (ATAE 2021), 2021, 48 : 381 - 387
  • [3] Seeding Rate Effects on Weed Control and Yield For Organic Soybean Production
    Place, George T.
    Reberg-Horton, Samuel Chris
    Dunphy, Jim E.
    Smith, Adam N.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) : 497 - 502
  • [4] Integrating mechanical and cultural methods for weed control in organic chickpea
    Miller, Zachariah J.
    Hubbel, Kyrstan
    WEED SCIENCE, 2024, 72 (06) : 774 - 781
  • [5] Integrating Cultural and Mechanical Methods for Additive Weed Control in Organic Systems
    Benaragama, Dilshan
    Shirtliffe, Steven J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2013, 105 (06) : 1728 - 1734
  • [6] Weed control in organic edamame soybean production
    Silvernail, Anthonv
    Bomford, Michaei K.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2006, 41 (04) : 1031 - 1031
  • [7] The effectiveness of flame weeding and cultivation on weed control, yield and yield components of organic soybean as influenced by manure application
    Stepanovic, Strahinja
    Datta, Avishek
    Neilson, Brian
    Bruening, Chris
    Shapiro, Charles
    Gogos, George
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (04) : 288 - 299
  • [8] Different weed densities and control methods of organic corn production components
    Chiovato, M. G.
    Galvao, J. C. C.
    Fontanetti, A.
    Ferreira, L. R.
    Miranda, G. V.
    Rodrigues, O. L.
    Borba, A. N.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2007, 25 (02) : 277 - 283
  • [9] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT WEED CONTROL PRACTICES AND SOWING METHODS ON WEEDS AND YIELD OF COTTON
    Nadeem, Muhammad Ather
    Idrees, Muhammad
    Ayub, Muhammad
    Tanveer, Asif
    Mubeen, Khuram
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2013, 45 (04) : 1321 - 1328
  • [10] The effect of mechanical weed control technique and irrigation method on yield, tuber quality and weed suppression in organic potato
    Mirabelli, C
    Colla, G
    Fiorillo, A
    Cardarelli, M
    Rouphael, Y
    Paolini, R
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETING OF THE PHYSIOLOGY SECTION OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR POTATO RESEARCH, 2005, (684): : 127 - 133