Patient-reported outcomes in adults after status epilepticus: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Jacq, Gwenaelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fontaine, Candice [1 ,2 ]
Legriel, Stephane [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Versailles Site Andre Mignot, Intens Care Dept, 177 rue Versailles, F-78150 Le Chesnay, France
[2] IctalGroup, Le Chesnay, France
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, F-94807 Villejuif, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Versailles, Intens Care Dept, 177 rue Versailles, F-78150 Le Chesnay, France
关键词
Status epilepticus; Systematic review; Outcome; patient-reported; Health-related quality of life; Health; mental; Epilepsy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS; EPILEPSY; ASSOCIATION; DEPRESSION; PREDICTORS; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109610
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Impairments after status epilepticus have generally been assessed by physicians, using generic scales. Patientreported outcomes (PROs) directly reflect each patient's experience and are therefore recommended to improve patient-centered care. The objective of this systematic review was to compile the available information on patient-reported outcomes of adults after status epilepticus. We used Medical Subject Headings terms to search PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to February 2023. We excluded reviews, case reports, abstract-only reports, editorials, and publications in languages other than English or French. Studies reporting PROs in adults after SE were eligible. Bias in included studies was assessed using the Newcastle -Ottawa Scale (NOS). Given the heterogeneity in assessment tools and outcomes, most of the results are presented separately for each included study. Only three studies met our criteria. All used an observational cohort design. Two were retrospective and one prospective. Of the 141 patients (76 males and 65 females, mean age 43-63 years), 105 (74.4 %) had a history of epilepsy before status epilepticus. The studies used four epilepsyspecific and five generic tools to assess five patient-reported outcomes: quality of life (n = 141), mental health (depression, n = 81, or anxiety, n = 49), physical health including fatigue (n = 130), return to work (n = 49), and side effects of antiepileptic drugs (n = 81). A single study (n = 81) was of good methodological quality. Healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL) and mental health were the most extensively studied outcomes, and both were impaired. HRQOL scores ranged from 41.7 +/- 11.5 to 48.3 +/- 24.5. The prevalence of depression and anxiety varied from 30 % to 36 %, and from 22 % to 62 %, respectively. However, data were not collected before the status epilepticus episode, and the possible impact of this last on the outcomes cannot therefore be assessed. Information on PROs of adults after status epilepticus is extremely scant. Patient-reported outcomes should be collected more widely in adults after status epilepticus.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review
    Ashley Kim
    Karen C. Chung
    Christopher Keir
    Donald L. Patrick
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [32] Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review
    S Vandenbroeck
    S De Geest
    T Zeyen
    I Stalmans
    F Dobbels
    Eye, 2011, 25 : 555 - 577
  • [33] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty
    Barone, M.
    Cogliandro, A.
    Di Stefano, N.
    Tambone, V.
    Persichetti, P.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (04) : 1807 - 1811
  • [34] Assessing health outcomes: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology
    Urretavizcaya, Mikel
    Alvarez, Karen
    Olariaga, Olatz
    Tames, Maria Jose
    Asensio, Ainhoa
    Cajaraville, Gerardo
    Riestra, Ana Cristina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2024,
  • [35] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty
    M. Barone
    A. Cogliandro
    N. Di Stefano
    V. Tambone
    P. Persichetti
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 1807 - 1811
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
    Yanpin Fan
    Xin Shu
    Katherine Chiu Man Leung
    Edward Chin Man Lo
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [37] Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review
    Charbel El-Kefraoui
    Uyen Do
    Andrew Miller
    Araz Kouyoumdjian
    David Cui
    Elahe Khorasani
    Tara Landry
    Alexandre Amar-Zifkin
    Lawrence Lee
    Liane S. Feldman
    Julio F. Fiore
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 8043 - 8056
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
    Fan, Yanpin
    Shu, Xin
    Leung, Katherine Chiu Man
    Lo, Edward Chin Man
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [39] Patient-Reported Mobility: A Systematic Review
    Pinto-Carral, Arrate
    Fernandez-Villa, Tania
    Molina de la Torre, Antonio Jose
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 97 (07): : 1182 - 1194
  • [40] Can we do better at measuring patient-reported outcomes after cranioplasty? A systematic review
    Zaramo, Taborah Z.
    Zelko, Ian
    Ragland, Dashaun
    Tunyi, Jude
    Kaur, Manraj N.
    Bajestani, Nojan
    Lee, Clara N.
    Chung, Kevin C.
    Mitchell, Kerry-Ann S.
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)