Patient-reported outcomes in adults after status epilepticus: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Jacq, Gwenaelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fontaine, Candice [1 ,2 ]
Legriel, Stephane [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Versailles Site Andre Mignot, Intens Care Dept, 177 rue Versailles, F-78150 Le Chesnay, France
[2] IctalGroup, Le Chesnay, France
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, F-94807 Villejuif, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Versailles, Intens Care Dept, 177 rue Versailles, F-78150 Le Chesnay, France
关键词
Status epilepticus; Systematic review; Outcome; patient-reported; Health-related quality of life; Health; mental; Epilepsy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS; EPILEPSY; ASSOCIATION; DEPRESSION; PREDICTORS; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109610
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Impairments after status epilepticus have generally been assessed by physicians, using generic scales. Patientreported outcomes (PROs) directly reflect each patient's experience and are therefore recommended to improve patient-centered care. The objective of this systematic review was to compile the available information on patient-reported outcomes of adults after status epilepticus. We used Medical Subject Headings terms to search PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to February 2023. We excluded reviews, case reports, abstract-only reports, editorials, and publications in languages other than English or French. Studies reporting PROs in adults after SE were eligible. Bias in included studies was assessed using the Newcastle -Ottawa Scale (NOS). Given the heterogeneity in assessment tools and outcomes, most of the results are presented separately for each included study. Only three studies met our criteria. All used an observational cohort design. Two were retrospective and one prospective. Of the 141 patients (76 males and 65 females, mean age 43-63 years), 105 (74.4 %) had a history of epilepsy before status epilepticus. The studies used four epilepsyspecific and five generic tools to assess five patient-reported outcomes: quality of life (n = 141), mental health (depression, n = 81, or anxiety, n = 49), physical health including fatigue (n = 130), return to work (n = 49), and side effects of antiepileptic drugs (n = 81). A single study (n = 81) was of good methodological quality. Healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL) and mental health were the most extensively studied outcomes, and both were impaired. HRQOL scores ranged from 41.7 +/- 11.5 to 48.3 +/- 24.5. The prevalence of depression and anxiety varied from 30 % to 36 %, and from 22 % to 62 %, respectively. However, data were not collected before the status epilepticus episode, and the possible impact of this last on the outcomes cannot therefore be assessed. Information on PROs of adults after status epilepticus is extremely scant. Patient-reported outcomes should be collected more widely in adults after status epilepticus.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic Review of Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Interventional Radiology
    Datta, Sanjit
    Cramer, Peyton
    Sung, Jeffrey
    Wright, Drew
    Charalel, Resmi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 20 (08) : 752 - 757
  • [22] Patient-reported outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review
    King, Madeleine T.
    Winters, Zoe E.
    Olivotto, Ivo A.
    Spillane, Andrew J.
    Chua, Boon H.
    Saunders, Christobel
    Westenberg, A. Helen
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Burnett, Petrina
    Butow, Phyllis
    Rutherford, Claudia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 71 : 95 - 108
  • [23] Patient-reported outcomes in Gaucher’s disease: a systematic review
    Junchao Feng
    Zhongchun Gao
    Zhao Shi
    Yue Wang
    Shunping Li
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 18
  • [24] Patient-reported outcomes in Hodgkin lymphoma trials: a systematic review
    Oliva, Esther Natalie
    Ionova, Tatyana
    Laane, Edward
    Csenar, Mario
    Schroer, Julia
    Behringer, Karolin
    Monsef, Ina
    Oeser, Annika
    Skoetz, Nicole
    Salek, Sam
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [25] Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review
    Vandenbroeck, S.
    De Geest, S.
    Zeyen, T.
    Stalmans, I.
    Dobbels, F.
    EYE, 2011, 25 (05) : 555 - 577
  • [26] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES PROJECT IN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Al-Ghabari, M.
    Michl, K.
    Ahmed
    Bele, S.
    Santana, M.
    Gregory, A.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (SUPPL 1) : S45 - S46
  • [27] Patient-reported outcomes in Gaucher's disease: a systematic review
    Feng, Junchao
    Gao, Zhongchun
    Shi, Zhao
    Wang, Yue
    Li, Shunping
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [28] Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review
    Kim, Ashley
    Chung, Karen C.
    Keir, Christopher
    Patrick, Donald L.
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [29] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Surgically Amenable Epiphora
    Schulz, Christopher B.
    Kennedy, Alasdair
    Rogers, Simon
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 34 (03): : 193 - 200
  • [30] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in retinal diseases: a systematic review
    Senthil, Mallika Prem
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 62 (04) : 546 - 582