Patient-reported outcomes in adults after status epilepticus: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Jacq, Gwenaelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fontaine, Candice [1 ,2 ]
Legriel, Stephane [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Versailles Site Andre Mignot, Intens Care Dept, 177 rue Versailles, F-78150 Le Chesnay, France
[2] IctalGroup, Le Chesnay, France
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, F-94807 Villejuif, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Versailles, Intens Care Dept, 177 rue Versailles, F-78150 Le Chesnay, France
关键词
Status epilepticus; Systematic review; Outcome; patient-reported; Health-related quality of life; Health; mental; Epilepsy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS; EPILEPSY; ASSOCIATION; DEPRESSION; PREDICTORS; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109610
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Impairments after status epilepticus have generally been assessed by physicians, using generic scales. Patientreported outcomes (PROs) directly reflect each patient's experience and are therefore recommended to improve patient-centered care. The objective of this systematic review was to compile the available information on patient-reported outcomes of adults after status epilepticus. We used Medical Subject Headings terms to search PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to February 2023. We excluded reviews, case reports, abstract-only reports, editorials, and publications in languages other than English or French. Studies reporting PROs in adults after SE were eligible. Bias in included studies was assessed using the Newcastle -Ottawa Scale (NOS). Given the heterogeneity in assessment tools and outcomes, most of the results are presented separately for each included study. Only three studies met our criteria. All used an observational cohort design. Two were retrospective and one prospective. Of the 141 patients (76 males and 65 females, mean age 43-63 years), 105 (74.4 %) had a history of epilepsy before status epilepticus. The studies used four epilepsyspecific and five generic tools to assess five patient-reported outcomes: quality of life (n = 141), mental health (depression, n = 81, or anxiety, n = 49), physical health including fatigue (n = 130), return to work (n = 49), and side effects of antiepileptic drugs (n = 81). A single study (n = 81) was of good methodological quality. Healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL) and mental health were the most extensively studied outcomes, and both were impaired. HRQOL scores ranged from 41.7 +/- 11.5 to 48.3 +/- 24.5. The prevalence of depression and anxiety varied from 30 % to 36 %, and from 22 % to 62 %, respectively. However, data were not collected before the status epilepticus episode, and the possible impact of this last on the outcomes cannot therefore be assessed. Information on PROs of adults after status epilepticus is extremely scant. Patient-reported outcomes should be collected more widely in adults after status epilepticus.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported outcomes for keloids: a systematic review
    Tan, Andrea
    Glass, Donald A., II
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI DERMATOLOGIA E VENEREOLOGIA, 2019, 154 (02): : 148 - 165
  • [2] Life after endometrial cancer: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes
    Shisler, Robert
    Sinnott, Jennifer A.
    Wang, Vivian
    Hebert, Courtney
    Salani, Ritu
    Felix, Ashley S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (02) : 403 - 413
  • [3] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Clara
    Sunu, Christine
    Pignone, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [4] Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Harry C. Alexander
    Cindy H. Nguyen
    Matthew R. Moore
    Adam S. Bartlett
    Jacqueline A. Hannam
    Garth H. Poole
    Alan F. Merry
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 2061 - 2071
  • [5] Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Alexander, Harry C.
    Nguyen, Cindy H.
    Moore, Matthew R.
    Bartlett, Adam S.
    Hannam, Jacqueline A.
    Poole, Garth H.
    Merry, Alan F.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2061 - 2071
  • [6] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma: protocol for a systematic review
    Gnass, Irmela
    Ritschel, Michaela
    Andrich, Silke
    Kuske, Silke
    Moschinski, Kai
    Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
    Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
    Flohe, Sascha
    Sturm, Johannes
    Windolf, Joachim
    Icks, Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [7] Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: A systematic review
    Waljee, Jennifer
    McGlinn, Evan P.
    Sears, Erika Davis
    Chung, Kevin C.
    SURGERY, 2014, 155 (05) : 799 - 808
  • [8] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review
    Mishra, Eleanor K.
    Stanton, Andrew
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [9] Systematic review of patient-reported outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery
    Prasad, Shashi
    Fong, Eric
    Ooi, Eng H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 248 - 255
  • [10] Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Gavaruzzi, Teresa
    Lotto, Lorella
    Giandomenico, Francesca
    Perin, Alessandro
    Pucciarelli, Salvatore
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (08) : 901 - 918