Patient satisfaction, joint stability and return to sports following simple elbow dislocations: surgical versus non-surgical treatment

被引:9
|
作者
Geyer, Stephanie [1 ]
Lacheta, Lucca [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Aspang, Jesse Seilern Und [5 ]
Willinger, Lukas [6 ]
Lutz, Patricia M. [1 ]
Lappen, Sebastian [1 ]
Imhoff, Andreas B. [1 ]
Siebenlist, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Orthopaed Sports Med, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Shoulder & Elbow Surg, Ctr Musculoskeletal Surg, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Trauma Surg, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
Elbow; Simple elbow dislocation; Instability; Ultrasound; Return to sports; LIGAMENT; REPAIR; INJURIES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04383-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose While conservative management is commonly promoted for simple elbow dislocations, the importance of primary surgical treatment in these injuries is still undetermined. The objective of this study was to report patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sports (RTS) and joint stability using ultrasound in patients following conservative or surgical treatment after simple elbow dislocation. Methods Patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months after conservative (CT) or surgical treatment (ST) following simple elbow dislocation were included in this retrospective study. To evaluate patients' postoperative outcome and satisfaction, the Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS) was used, and validated scores such as the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the Quick Disability of Arm and Shoulder Score (Quick-DASH) and RTS were assessed. For objective assessment of residual joint instability, a standardized clinical examination as well as a dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the affected and the contralateral elbow was performed. Results Forty-four patients (26 women, 18 men) with an average age of 41.5 +/- 15.3 years were available for follow-up survey (65.5 +/- 30.4 months; range 26-123). 21 patients were treated conservatively and twenty-three patients received surgical treatment. CT and ST resulted in similar outcome with regard to ROM, ESAS (CT: 99.4 +/- 1.5; ST: 99.8 +/- 0.3), MEPS (CT: 97.3 +/- 6.8 points; ST: 98.7 +/- 3.3) and Quick-DASH (CT: 7.8 +/- 10.4; ST: 6.3 +/- 7.9) (n.s.). There was no difference in elbow stability and laxity measured by ultrasound between the study groups and compared to the healthy elbow (n.s.). Two patients of the CT group (10%) complained about persistent subjective elbow instability. RTS was faster after surgical compared to conservative treatment (p = 0.036). Conclusion Both, conservative and surgical treatment results in high patient satisfaction and good-to-excellent functional outcome after simple elbow dislocation. Even though ultrasound evaluation showed no significant differences in joint gapping between groups, 10% of conservatively treated patients complained about severe subjective instability. Surgically treated patients returned faster to their preoperatively performed sports. Thus, primary surgical treatment may be beneficial for high demanding patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1489
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SURGICAL VERSUS NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RECURRENT PERIODONTAL-DISEASE IN BEAGLE DOGS
    AUKHIL, I
    SCHABERG, TV
    GRECO, GW
    SIMPSON, DM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1988, 15 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [42] Surgical versus non-surgical treatment in the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome
    Martinez-Ruiz de Apodaca, Paula
    Carrasco-Llatas, Marina
    Esteller-More, Eduard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 138
  • [43] Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit
    Abudou, Minawaer
    Chen, Xueyi
    Kong, Xiangyu
    Wu, Taixiang
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (06):
  • [44] IMPROVEMENT IN TMJ, MUSCLE AND HEADACHE SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS FOLLOWING SURGICAL AND NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT
    VALLERAND, WP
    HALL, MB
    HARTLEY, GM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1988, 46 (12) : M17 - M18
  • [45] SURGICAL VERSUS NONSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LIGAMENTOUS INJURIES FOLLOWING DISLOCATION OF THE ELBOW JOINT - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    JOSEFSSON, PO
    GENTZ, CF
    JOHNELL, O
    WENDEBERG, B
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (04): : 605 - 608
  • [46] Evaluation of inflammasomes as biomarker following non-surgical periodontal treatment
    Kabacaoglu, Bilge
    Ozener, Hafize Ozturk
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 164
  • [47] The methodological quality of systematic reviews comparing temporomandibular joint disorder surgical and non-surgical treatment
    Bessa-Nogueira R.V.
    Vasconcelos B.C.E.
    Niederman R.
    BMC Oral Health, 8 (1)
  • [48] Effects of non-surgical joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis
    Khademi-Kalantari, Khosro
    Aghdam, Somayeh Mahmoodi
    Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh
    Rezayi, Mehdi
    Rahimi, Abbas
    Naimee, Sedighesadat
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2014, 18 (04) : 533 - 539
  • [49] A prospective study of non-surgical versus surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability
    Jung, Jong-myung
    Hyun, Seung-Jae
    Kim, Ki-Jeong
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Cho, Yong Eun
    Shin, Dong Ah
    Park, Youn-Kwan
    Choi, Yunhee
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 80 : 100 - 107
  • [50] AN UPDATE REGARDING THE NON-SURGICAL VERSUS SURGICAL TREATMENT PROTOCOLS IN PERIODONTOLOGY. A NARRATIVE REVIEW
    Kanarakis, Ioannis
    Goriuc, Ancuta
    Martu, Maria Alexandra
    Sandu, Darius
    Pasarin, Liliana
    Bejan, Oana
    Butnaru, Oana
    Nichitean, Giorgio
    Luchian, Ionut
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 14 (04): : 210 - 220