Patient satisfaction, joint stability and return to sports following simple elbow dislocations: surgical versus non-surgical treatment

被引:9
|
作者
Geyer, Stephanie [1 ]
Lacheta, Lucca [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Aspang, Jesse Seilern Und [5 ]
Willinger, Lukas [6 ]
Lutz, Patricia M. [1 ]
Lappen, Sebastian [1 ]
Imhoff, Andreas B. [1 ]
Siebenlist, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Orthopaed Sports Med, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Shoulder & Elbow Surg, Ctr Musculoskeletal Surg, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Trauma Surg, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
Elbow; Simple elbow dislocation; Instability; Ultrasound; Return to sports; LIGAMENT; REPAIR; INJURIES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04383-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose While conservative management is commonly promoted for simple elbow dislocations, the importance of primary surgical treatment in these injuries is still undetermined. The objective of this study was to report patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sports (RTS) and joint stability using ultrasound in patients following conservative or surgical treatment after simple elbow dislocation. Methods Patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months after conservative (CT) or surgical treatment (ST) following simple elbow dislocation were included in this retrospective study. To evaluate patients' postoperative outcome and satisfaction, the Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS) was used, and validated scores such as the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the Quick Disability of Arm and Shoulder Score (Quick-DASH) and RTS were assessed. For objective assessment of residual joint instability, a standardized clinical examination as well as a dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the affected and the contralateral elbow was performed. Results Forty-four patients (26 women, 18 men) with an average age of 41.5 +/- 15.3 years were available for follow-up survey (65.5 +/- 30.4 months; range 26-123). 21 patients were treated conservatively and twenty-three patients received surgical treatment. CT and ST resulted in similar outcome with regard to ROM, ESAS (CT: 99.4 +/- 1.5; ST: 99.8 +/- 0.3), MEPS (CT: 97.3 +/- 6.8 points; ST: 98.7 +/- 3.3) and Quick-DASH (CT: 7.8 +/- 10.4; ST: 6.3 +/- 7.9) (n.s.). There was no difference in elbow stability and laxity measured by ultrasound between the study groups and compared to the healthy elbow (n.s.). Two patients of the CT group (10%) complained about persistent subjective elbow instability. RTS was faster after surgical compared to conservative treatment (p = 0.036). Conclusion Both, conservative and surgical treatment results in high patient satisfaction and good-to-excellent functional outcome after simple elbow dislocation. Even though ultrasound evaluation showed no significant differences in joint gapping between groups, 10% of conservatively treated patients complained about severe subjective instability. Surgically treated patients returned faster to their preoperatively performed sports. Thus, primary surgical treatment may be beneficial for high demanding patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1489
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BONE REGENERATION IN INTRABONY DEFECTS FOLLOWING SURGICAL AND NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT
    ISIDOR, F
    KARRING, T
    ATTSTROM, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 (04) : 483 - 483
  • [22] PATIENT SATISFACTION AND EFFICACY OF NON-SURGICAL LYSIS OF CLITORAL ADHESIONS
    Myers, M.
    Romanello, J.
    Nico, E.
    Sussman, R.
    Marantidis, J.
    Rubin, R.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (08): : S39 - S40
  • [24] Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity
    Gloy, Viktoria L.
    Briel, Matthias
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Kashyap, Sangeeta R.
    Schauer, Philip R.
    Mingrone, Geltrude
    Bucher, Heiner C.
    Nordmann, Alain J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (04) : 246 - 246
  • [25] Surgery versus non-surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
    Vaughan, Brett
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 2014, 17 (01) : 75 - 75
  • [26] Surgery versus non-surgical treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysms
    Tisi, PV
    Callam, MJ
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (01):
  • [27] Effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical interventions in treatment of digital mucous cysts
    Shea, Moira
    Hill, Emma
    Roland-Mcgowan, Jaclyn
    Becker, Sarah L.
    Simpson, Eric
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 317 (01)
  • [28] Surgical versus non-surgical endodontic re-treatment for periradicular lesions
    Del Fabbro, M.
    Taschieri, S.
    Testori, T.
    Francetti, L.
    Weinstein, R. L.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (03):
  • [29] RESULTS OF SURGICAL VERSUS NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM
    STANFORD, JR
    KING, DR
    EVANS, WE
    VASCULAR SURGERY, 1978, 12 (03): : 157 - 163
  • [30] Cochrane in CORR®: Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Aleem, Ilyas S.
    Drew, Brian
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (11) : 2632 - 2637