The minimal important difference of the constant work rate cycle test in severe COPD

被引:0
|
作者
van der Molen, Marieke C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Augustijn, Sonja W. S. [1 ]
Kerstjens, Huib A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hartman, Jorine E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen Res Inst Asthma, COPD, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis AA11, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; HEALTH-STATUS; STANDARDIZATION; MORTALITY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107265
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Constant Work Rate Cycle Test (CWRT) is a commonly used and sensitive test to detect treatment success in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Earlier, the Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the CWRT was estimated at 101 s (or 34%) change from baseline based on one well executed study. However, this study was performed in a population of patients with mild-to-moderate COPD, and we have learned that MIDs might be quite different in patients with severe COPD. Therefore, we aimed to establish the MID of the CWRT in patients with severe COPD. Methods: We included 141 patients with severe COPD, who underwent either pulmonary rehabilitation, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves, or a sham bronchoscopy as a control group. CWRT workload was set at 75% of the peak work capacity, as determined by an incremental cycle test. We used the change in 6-min walking test (6-MWT), forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score as anchors to calculate the MID. Results: All anchors had an association of >= 0.41 with change in CWRT. The MID estimates for the different anchors were: 6-MWT 278 s (95%), FEV1 273 s (90%), RV 240 s (84%), and SGRQ 208 s (71%). The average of these four MID estimates resulted in an MID of 250 s (or 85%). Conclusion: We established the MID for CWRT at 250 s (or 85%) change from baseline in patients with severe COPD.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE OF TWO METHODS FOR ASSESSMENT OF QUADRICEPS FEMORIS STRENGTH IN INDIVIDUALS WITH COPD
    Santin, Lais
    Fonseca, Jessica
    Hirata, Raquel
    Hernandes, Nidia Aparecida
    Pitta, Fabio
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [42] Endurance Time During Constant Work Rate Cycle Ergometry in COPD: Development of an Integrated Database From Interventional Studies
    Casaburi, Richard
    Merrill, Debora
    Dolmage, Thomas
    Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
    Fageras, Malin
    Goldstein, Roger
    Harding, Gale
    Leidy, Nancy Kline
    Maltais, Francois
    O'Donnell, Denis
    Porszasz, Janos
    Puente-Maestu, Luis
    Rennard, Stephen
    Sciurba, Frank
    Spruit, Martijn A.
    Tal-Singer, Ruth
    Tetzlaff, Kay
    Van't Hul, Alex
    Yu, Ren
    Hamilton, Alan
    CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASES-JOURNAL OF THE COPD FOUNDATION, 2022, 9 (04): : 520 - 537
  • [43] The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) - minimal clinically important difference and sensitivity to change
    Masoli, Matthew
    Lanario, Joseph
    Hyland, Michael
    Menzies-Gow, Andrew
    Mansur, Adel
    Allen, David
    James, Dodd
    Hayes, Gemma
    Valderas, Jose
    Lamb, Sallie
    Jones, Rupert
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [44] Minimum important difference of the incremental shuttle walk test distance in patients with COPD
    Evans, Rachael A.
    Singh, Sally J.
    THORAX, 2019, 74 (10) : 994 - 995
  • [45] The Minimum Important Difference Of The Incremental Shuttle Walk Test Distance In Patients With COPD
    Evans, R. A.
    Dunstan-Harvey, T. C.
    Singh, S. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [46] Minimal clinically important difference of 3-minute chair rise test and the DIRECT questionnaire after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
    Levesque, Jonathan
    Antoniadis, Anestis
    Li, Pei Zhi
    Herengt, Frederic
    Brosson, Christophe
    Grosbois, Jean-Marie
    Bernady, Alain
    Bender, Anthony
    Favre, Murielle
    Guerder, Antoine
    Surpas, Pascale
    Similowski, Thomas
    Aguilaniu, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2019, 14 : 261 - 269
  • [47] Prospective Validation Of The Minimal Important Difference Estimate Of The Endurance Shuttle Walking Test
    Borel, B.
    Pepin, V.
    Mahler, D. A.
    Nadreau, E.
    Crater, G. D.
    Morris, A.
    Emmett, A. H.
    Ferro, T. J.
    Maltais, F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187
  • [48] Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
    Alma, Harma
    de Jong, Corina
    Jelusic, Danijel
    Wittmann, Michael
    Schuler, Michael
    Flokstra-de Blok, Bertine
    Kocks, Janwillem
    Schultz, Konrad
    van der Molen, Thys
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 26
  • [49] Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Quadriceps Muscle Strength in People with COPD following Pulmonary Rehabilitation
    Oliveira, Ana
    Rebelo, Patricia
    Paixao, Catia
    Jacome, Cristina
    Cruz, Joana
    Martins, Vitoria
    Simao, Paula
    Brooks, Dina
    Marques, Alda
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2021, 18 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [50] Estimation of the minimal important difference (MID) for the 1 repetition max (1RM) in COPD
    Edwards, George D.
    Patel, Suhani
    Jenkins, Timothy
    Ingram, Karen A.
    Man, William D-C
    Nolan, Claire M.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62