The minimal important difference of the constant work rate cycle test in severe COPD

被引:0
|
作者
van der Molen, Marieke C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Augustijn, Sonja W. S. [1 ]
Kerstjens, Huib A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hartman, Jorine E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen Res Inst Asthma, COPD, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis AA11, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; HEALTH-STATUS; STANDARDIZATION; MORTALITY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107265
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Constant Work Rate Cycle Test (CWRT) is a commonly used and sensitive test to detect treatment success in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Earlier, the Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the CWRT was estimated at 101 s (or 34%) change from baseline based on one well executed study. However, this study was performed in a population of patients with mild-to-moderate COPD, and we have learned that MIDs might be quite different in patients with severe COPD. Therefore, we aimed to establish the MID of the CWRT in patients with severe COPD. Methods: We included 141 patients with severe COPD, who underwent either pulmonary rehabilitation, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves, or a sham bronchoscopy as a control group. CWRT workload was set at 75% of the peak work capacity, as determined by an incremental cycle test. We used the change in 6-min walking test (6-MWT), forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score as anchors to calculate the MID. Results: All anchors had an association of >= 0.41 with change in CWRT. The MID estimates for the different anchors were: 6-MWT 278 s (95%), FEV1 273 s (90%), RV 240 s (84%), and SGRQ 208 s (71%). The average of these four MID estimates resulted in an MID of 250 s (or 85%). Conclusion: We established the MID for CWRT at 250 s (or 85%) change from baseline in patients with severe COPD.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Clinical COPD Questionnaire: response to pulmonary rehabilitation and minimal clinically important difference
    Kon, Samantha S. C.
    Dilaver, Deniz
    Mittal, Manvi
    Nolan, Claire M.
    Clark, Amy L.
    Canavan, Jane L.
    Jones, Sarah E.
    Polkey, Michael I.
    Man, William D-C
    THORAX, 2014, 69 (09) : 793 - 798
  • [32] Do We Know the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for COPD Exacerbations?
    Chapman, Kenneth R.
    Bergeron, Celine
    Bhutani, Mohit
    Bourbeau, Jean
    Grossman, Ronald F.
    Hernandez, Paul
    McIvor, R. Andrew
    Mayers, Irvin
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2013, 10 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [33] The Severe Asthma Questionnaire: sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference
    Masoli, Matthew
    Lanario, Joseph W.
    Hyland, Michael E.
    Menzies-Gow, Andrew
    Mansur, Adel H.
    Allen, David
    Dodd, James W.
    Hayes, Gemma
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    Jones, Rupert C.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 57 (06)
  • [34] Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis
    Kon, Samantha S. C.
    Canavan, Jane L.
    Jones, Sarah E.
    Nolan, Claire M.
    Clark, Amy L.
    Dickson, Mandy J.
    Haselden, Brigitte M.
    Polkey, Michael I.
    Man, William D-C
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (03): : 195 - 203
  • [35] Perceived locus of symptom limitation during constant work rate cycle ergometry in COPD patients treated with tiotropium
    O'Donnell, DE
    Maltais, F
    Frith, P
    Southcott, AM
    Kesten, S
    Hamilton, A
    CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) : 838S - 838S
  • [36] An Application of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Test for the Diabetes Distress Scale
    Banks, J.
    Amspoker, A. B.
    Woodard, L.
    Naik, A. D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 : S244 - S244
  • [37] Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the angioedema control test
    Fijen, Laure M.
    Vera, Carolina
    Buttgereit, Thomas
    Bonnekoh, Hanna
    Maurer, Marcus
    Magerl, Markus
    Weller, Karsten
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2023, 13 (09)
  • [38] Minimal clinically important difference and predictive validity of the mMRC and mBorg in acute exacerbations of COPD
    Oliveira, Ana Luisa Araujo
    Andrade, Lilia
    Marques, Alda
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50
  • [39] The impact of patient characteristics on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of COPD health status tools
    Alma, Harma
    De Jong, Corina
    Jelusic, Danijel
    Wittmann, Michael
    Schuler, Michael
    Sanderman, Robbert
    Schultz, Konrad
    Kocks, Janwillem
    Van der Molen, Thys
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [40] The 4-metre gait speed in COPD: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference
    Kon, Samantha S. C.
    Canavan, Jane L.
    Nolan, Claire M.
    Clark, Amy L.
    Jones, Sarah E.
    Cullinan, Paul
    Polkey, Michael I.
    Man, William D-C.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 43 (05) : 1298 - 1305