The minimal important difference of the constant work rate cycle test in severe COPD

被引:0
|
作者
van der Molen, Marieke C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Augustijn, Sonja W. S. [1 ]
Kerstjens, Huib A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hartman, Jorine E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen Res Inst Asthma, COPD, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis AA11, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; HEALTH-STATUS; STANDARDIZATION; MORTALITY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107265
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Constant Work Rate Cycle Test (CWRT) is a commonly used and sensitive test to detect treatment success in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Earlier, the Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the CWRT was estimated at 101 s (or 34%) change from baseline based on one well executed study. However, this study was performed in a population of patients with mild-to-moderate COPD, and we have learned that MIDs might be quite different in patients with severe COPD. Therefore, we aimed to establish the MID of the CWRT in patients with severe COPD. Methods: We included 141 patients with severe COPD, who underwent either pulmonary rehabilitation, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves, or a sham bronchoscopy as a control group. CWRT workload was set at 75% of the peak work capacity, as determined by an incremental cycle test. We used the change in 6-min walking test (6-MWT), forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score as anchors to calculate the MID. Results: All anchors had an association of >= 0.41 with change in CWRT. The MID estimates for the different anchors were: 6-MWT 278 s (95%), FEV1 273 s (90%), RV 240 s (84%), and SGRQ 208 s (71%). The average of these four MID estimates resulted in an MID of 250 s (or 85%). Conclusion: We established the MID for CWRT at 250 s (or 85%) change from baseline in patients with severe COPD.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Refining The Constant Work Rate Cycle Exercise Test In Patients With COPD
    Webb, K. A.
    Preston, M.
    Hamilton, A.
    O'Donnell, D. E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [2] The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD
    Puhan, M. A.
    Chandra, D.
    Mosenifar, Z.
    Ries, A.
    Make, B.
    Hansel, N. N.
    Wise, R. A.
    Sciurba, F.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2011, 37 (04) : 784 - 790
  • [3] THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE OF THE COPD ASSESSMENT TEST
    Kon, S. S. C.
    Canavan, J. L.
    Clark, A. L.
    Jones, S. E.
    Nolan, C. M.
    Polkey, M. I.
    Man, W. D. C.
    THORAX, 2013, 68 : A89 - A90
  • [4] The minimal clinically important difference of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire in severe COPD
    Raveling, Tim
    Kort, Janine
    Bladder, Gerrie
    Windisch, Wolfram
    Wijkstra, Peter J.
    Duiverman, Marieke L.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56 (06)
  • [5] Determination of the minimal important difference for inspiratory muscle strength in people with severe and very severe COPD
    Beaumont, Marc
    Couasnon, Charles
    Peran, Loic
    Berriet, Anne Cecile
    Ber, Catherine Le
    Pichon, Romain
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 37 (11) : 1521 - 1532
  • [6] Responsiveness of the COPD Assessment Test The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Does Matter
    Kocks, Janwillem W. H.
    Tsiligianni, Ioanna G.
    van der Molen, Thys
    CHEST, 2012, 142 (01) : 267 - 268
  • [7] The minimal important difference for the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with severe COPD
    Welling, Jorrit B. A.
    Hartman, Jorine E.
    Ten Hacken, Nick H. T.
    Klooster, Karin
    Slebos, Dirk-Jan
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46 (06) : 1598 - 1604
  • [8] Responsiveness of the COPD Assessment Test The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Does Matter Response
    Jones, Paul W.
    CHEST, 2012, 142 (01) : 268 - 269
  • [9] Predictors of low endurance time in constant work rate cycle testing in COPD
    Casaburi, Richard
    Hamilton, Alan
    Spruit, Martijn
    Merrill, Debora
    Harding, Gale
    Locantore, Nicholas
    Rodriguez, Danielle
    Yu, Ren
    Rossiter, Harry
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [10] The Minimal Important Difference in Physical Activity in Patients with COPD
    Demeyer, Heleen
    Burtin, Chris
    Hornikx, Miek
    Camillo, Carlos Augusto
    Van Remoortel, Hans
    Langer, Daniel
    Janssens, Wim
    Troosters, Thierry
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):