How does co-creation influence healthcare regulations? An analysis of co-creation in social innovation

被引:1
|
作者
Tschumi, Pascal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mayer, Heike [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Res Inst Forest Snow & Landscape WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, CRED, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Co-creation; institutional change; regulation; healthcare; social innovation; PARTICIPATION; INSTITUTIONS; DYNAMICS; ACTORS;
D O I
10.1080/13511610.2023.2296380
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Social innovations are discussed as solutions to societal challenges, such as ensuring quality healthcare provision. Co-creation (i.e. the collaboration of actors who share their knowledge and skills), a primary feature of social innovation, can play a central role in changing formal institutions such as regulations, which is crucial to solving challenges in highly regulated sectors such as healthcare. However, research investigating how co-creation in social innovation can influence regulations is lacking. We investigate how co-creation can affect the ways social innovation actors influence healthcare regulations by analysing three social innovations in the Bernese Oberland, a Swiss mountain region facing the challenge of maintaining quality healthcare provision. Applying innovation biographies and semi-structured interviews, we find that two co-creating actor types were involved in influencing regulations: social innovation leaders and actors who fulfil central social innovation tasks. They influenced regulations by suggesting changes and inducing others to implement them, and they learned knowledge and skills in co-creation that helped them perform these activities. However, resources unrelated to co-creation also helped them influence regulations, such as actor networks and skills in persuading others. Co-creation in social innovation can thus support institutional change but is not a guarantee for it.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 117
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Value co-creation in online healthcare communities
    Shirazi, Farid
    Wu, Yun
    Hajli, Ali
    Zadeh, Arash H.
    Hajli, Nick
    Lin, Xiaolin
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 167
  • [22] The Co-creation Canvas
    Garmann-Johnsen, Niels F.
    Olsen, Dag H.
    Eikebrokk, Tom R.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES 2020 (CENTERIS/PROJMAN/HCIST 2020), 2021, 181 : 189 - 197
  • [23] The meanings of co-creation
    Ind, Nicholas
    Coates, Nick
    EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2013, 25 (01) : 86 - 95
  • [24] CO-CREATION IN ORGANISATIONS
    Cheriet, Nabil
    Ahnyne, Redouane
    Saad, Ghizlane
    4TH INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AND GLOBALIZATION STUDIES (MIRDEC), 2017, : 109 - 115
  • [25] Ecosystems of Co-Creation
    Eckhardt, Jennifer
    Kaletka, Christoph
    Krueger, Daniel
    Maldonado-Mariscal, Karina
    Schulz, Ann Christin
    FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY, 2021, 6
  • [26] Co-creation as choreography
    Haanpaa, Minni
    QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (05): : 614 - 624
  • [27] Co-creation and Synchronization
    Maeda, Yusuke
    Suzuki, Taira
    Okabayashi, Haruo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 504 - 504
  • [28] Co-creation in healthcare: framing the outcomes and their determinants
    Fusco, Floriana
    Marsilio, Marta
    Guglielmetti, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 34 (06) : 1 - 26
  • [29] USING DIGITAL CO-CREATION FOR INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT
    Ligthart, Ruusa
    Porokuokka, Jaakko
    Keranen, Krista
    WHAT'S AHEAD IN SERVICE RESEARCH?: NEW PERSPECTIVES FOR BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2016, : 1297 - 1306
  • [30] CHAOS: A Co-Creation
    Waldron, Hannah
    Braund, Steve
    JOURNAL OF ILLUSTRATION, 2020, 7 (1-2) : 205 - 223