Comparison of Home and Office Blood Pressure Devices in the Clinical Setting

被引:3
|
作者
Juraschek, Stephen P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vyavahare, Medha [2 ]
Cluett, Jennifer L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Turkson-Ocran, Ruth-Alma [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mukamal, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Ishak, Anthony M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Healthcare Associates, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
blood pressure; home blood pressure monitoring; hypertension; pharmacist; self-measured blood pressure; validation; VALIDATION; STANDARD;
D O I
10.1093/ajh/hpad120
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring is increasingly used for remote hypertension management, but the real-world performance of home blood pressure (BP) devices is unknown. We examined BP measurements from patients' home devices using the American Medical Association's (AMA) SMBP Device Accuracy Test tool.METHODS: Patients at a single internal medicine clinic underwent up to five seated, same-arm BP readings using a home device and an automated BP device (Omron HEM-907XL). Following the AMA's three-step protocol, we used the patient's home device for the first, second, and fourth measurements and the office device for the third and fifth (if needed) measurements. Device agreement failure was defined as an absolute difference in systolic BP >10 mm Hg between the home and office devices in either of two confirmatory steps. Performance was examined by brand (Omron vs. non-Omron). Moreover, we examined patient factors associated with agreement failure via logistic regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics.RESULTS: We evaluated 152 patients (mean age 60 +/- 15 years, 58% women, 31% Black) seen between October 2020 and November 2021. Device agreement failure occurred in 22.4% (95% CI: 16.4%, 29.7%) of devices tested, including 19.1% among Omron devices and 27.6% among non-Omron devices (P = 0.23). No patient characteristics were associated with agreement failure.CONCLUSIONS: Over one-fifth of home devices did not agree based on the AMA SMBP device accuracy protocol. These findings confirm the importance of office-based device comparisons to ensure the accuracy of home BP monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 348
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of office, ambulatory and home blood pressure in children and adolescents on the basis of normalcy tables
    Stergiou, G. S.
    Karpettas, N.
    Panagiotakos, D. B.
    Vazeou, A.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2011, 25 (04) : 218 - 223
  • [42] Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements: comparison, agreement, and determinants
    Nadia Boubouchairopoulou
    Angeliki Ntineri
    Anastasios Kollias
    Antonios Destounis
    George S. Stergiou
    Hypertension Research, 2021, 44 : 1617 - 1624
  • [43] Comparison of home and office blood pressure in treated hypertensives in the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) Study
    Kjeldsen, SE
    Hedner, T
    Syvertsen, JO
    Lund-Johansen, P
    Hansson, L
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2002, 11 (06) : 371 - 376
  • [44] Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements: comparison, agreement, and determinants
    Boubouchairopoulou, Nadia
    Ntineri, Angeliki
    Kollias, Anastasios
    Destounis, Antonios
    Stergiou, George S.
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2021, 44 (12) : 1617 - 1624
  • [45] Evaluation of interarm blood pressure differences using the Microlife WatchBP Office in a clinical setting
    Krogager, Christoffer
    Laugesen, Esben
    Rossen, Niklas B.
    Poulsen, Per L.
    Erlandsen, Mogens
    Hansen, Klavs W.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2017, 22 (03) : 161 - 165
  • [46] The prognostic value of home blood pressure and office blood pressure in hypertensive patients
    Solomou, ST
    Grivas, AA
    Psilogiannopoulos, MP
    Anagnostakis, EE
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 23 : S32 - S32
  • [47] Nocturnal blood pressure measured by home devices: evidence and perspective for clinical application
    Asayama, Kei
    Fujiwara, Takeshi
    Hoshide, Satoshi
    Ohkubo, Takayoshi
    Kario, Kazuomi
    Stergiou, George S.
    Parati, Gianfranco
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Imai, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2019, 37 (05) : 905 - 916
  • [48] Self-measurement of blood pressure in the office and at home
    Myers, MG
    Parati, G
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 (12) : 2223 - 2225
  • [49] Home versus intensive care pressure support devices - Experimental and clinical comparison
    Lofaso, F
    Brochard, L
    Hang, T
    Lorino, H
    Harf, A
    Isabey, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 153 (05) : 1591 - 1599
  • [50] DEVICES FOR MONITORING BLOOD-PRESSURE AT HOME
    不详
    MEDICAL LETTER ON DRUGS AND THERAPEUTICS, 1977, 19 (13): : 55 - 56