Comparative Environmental Evaluation of Sewage Sludge Treatment and Aggregate Production Process by Life Cycle Assessment

被引:4
|
作者
Yang, Seong-Jun [1 ]
Eom, Ji-Young [1 ]
Lee, Myung-Jin [1 ]
Hwang, Dae-Hwan [1 ]
Park, Won-Bin [1 ]
Wie, Young-Min [2 ]
Lee, Ki-Gang [2 ]
Lee, Kang-Hoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Energy & Environm Engn, 43 Jibong Ro, Bucheon 14662, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Mat Engn, Suwon 16227, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
life cycle assessment; sewage sludge; lightweight aggregate; waste recycling; resource circulation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; WASTE-WATER; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; ENERGY; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/su16010226
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the environmental impact of landfill, incineration, and lightweight aggregate production for sewage sludge management techniques and compared the utilization of sewage-produced lightweight aggregates with natural aggregates in terms of building material production. Two scenarios were established for the life cycle assessment (LCA) of the sludge and associated product that was carried out after sludge generation. Sludge incineration and landfill deposition includes emissions from the drying, transportation, incineration of sludge, and landfill, and the production of lightweight aggregates and natural aggregates includes transportation to manufacturing facilities, the manufacturing processes themselves, and transportation of the produced aggregates to construction sites. We calculated the amount of pollutant emissions for each process in each scenario and analyzed the environmental impact index considering the environmental impact of each pollutant using the Open LCA program. The parameters used for the environmental impact index analysis for sludge management are potential acidification, climate change, eutrophication potential, human toxicity, photochemical oxidation, and stratospheric ozone depletion. The environmental impact values of lightweight aggregates (LWA) are GWP 100 441 kg CO2_Eq, AP 2.73 x 10-2 kg SO2_Eq, EP 4.46 x 10-3 kg PO4-_Eq, HTP 4.15 x 10-2 kg, 1,4-DCB_Eq, POCP 1.64 x 10-3 kg CH4_Eq, and ODP 3.41 x 10-7 kg CFC-11_Eq. We found that these values were low compared to landfill and incineration as a sewage sludge disposal method and compared to natural aggregate as a construction material production method. The environmental impact index analysis during LCA of lightweight aggregates produced from the sludge verified its positive environmental impact compared to the other potential methods of sludge management.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge treatment and disposal based on nutrient and energy recovery: A review
    Ding, An
    Zhang, Rourou
    Ngo, Huu Hao
    He, Xu
    Ma, Jun
    Nan, Jun
    Li, Guibai
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 769
  • [42] Sewage sludge co-pyrolysis with agricultural/forest residues: A comparative life-cycle assessment
    Mohamed, Badr A.
    Ruan, Roger
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Periyasamy, Selvakumar
    Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar
    Rajamohan, Natarajan
    Leng, Lijian
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 192
  • [43] Environmental life cycle assessment of combined process for biodiesel and hydrogen production
    Faleh, Nahla
    Ben Hnich, Khaoula
    Khila, Zouhour
    Hajjaji, Noureddine
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [44] Life cycle assessment of energy consumption and GHG emission for sewage sludge treatment and disposal: a review
    Yu, Shilin
    Deng, Shuanghui
    Zhou, Ao
    Wang, Xuebin
    Tan, Houzhang
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 11
  • [45] Comparative life cycle assessment of pervious concrete production in Malaysia with natural and recycled aggregate
    Aan Mohammad Nusrat Aman
    Anurita Selvarajoo
    Siewhui Chong
    Fang Yenn Teo
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2022, 7
  • [46] Compost versus biogas treatment of sewage sludge dilemma assessment using life cycle analysis
    Morsink-Georgali, Phoebe-Zoe
    Kylili, Angeliki
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    Papadopoulos, Agis M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [47] Comparative life cycle assessment of pervious concrete production in Malaysia with natural and recycled aggregate
    Aman, Aan Mohammad Nusrat
    Selvarajoo, Anurita
    Chong, Siewhui
    Teo, Fang Yenn
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2022, 7 (03)
  • [48] Sewage sludge co-pyrolysis with agricultural/forest residues: A comparative life-cycle assessment
    Mohamed, Badr A.
    Ruan, Roger
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Periyasamy, Selvakumar
    Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar
    Rajamohan, Natarajan
    Leng, Lijian
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 192
  • [49] A comparative life cycle assessment on mono- and co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge
    Tong, Huanhuan
    Tong, Yen-Wah
    Peng, Ying Hong
    INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 4166 - 4171
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of the use of sewage sludge as Portland cement replacement
    Pavlik, Z.
    Pavlikova, M.
    Zaleska, M.
    Lagod, G.
    Suchorab, Z.
    Guz, L.
    IV INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCE (CMES'19), 2019, 710